Big Technology Podcast
Big Technology Podcast

Is the Tech Press Bad? With The Verge's Casey Newton

The Verge's Casey Newton writes The Interface, a daily newsletter about social media and democracy. He joins the podcast to talk about the tech press, Facebook, and the newsletter life. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Featured Speakers

Alex Kantrowitz HostCasey Newton Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Casey Newton argues that tech journalism is strong, but the broader information ecosystem is distorted by Google, Facebook, and Twitter incentives that flatten coverage, reward outrage, and weaken trust. The conversation then turns to Facebook’s scale, accountability, and mixed societal impact, ending with Newton’s case for newsletter writing as a calmer, more trustworthy form of reporting that restores nuance, humility, and context.

Main Topics: Health of the tech press (Priority: 5/5): Newton defends tech journalism as producing some of its best work in years, while acknowledging public distrust driven more by platform dynamics than by reporting quality. Algorithms and outrage in media (Priority: 5/5): He argues that Google, Facebook, and Twitter shape publishing incentives, causing sameness, outrage-driven stories, and an erosion of trust in the press. Public perception and reporter accountability (Priority: 4/5): The discussion explores why tech workers see reporters as hostile and how reporters can better explain their principles, methods, and areas of concern. Facebook’s scale and societal effects (Priority: 5/5): Newton describes Facebook as simultaneously beneficial and dangerous, emphasizing its role in polarization, extremism, and the lack of meaningful external accountability. Competition, regulation, and reform (Priority: 4/5): They debate whether Facebook can be fixed, whether regulation should target speech or market power, and whether breaking up Instagram/WhatsApp would help. Newsletter writing as a better medium (Priority: 5/5): Newton says The Interface lets him build trust, provide context, accept pushback, and write with more humility and calm than traditional beat reporting.

Key Arguments: Tech journalism is producing high-quality work; the problem is not the reporters but the platform-driven information environment. Google and Facebook reward content optimized for traffic, which makes many sites look and sound the same. Twitter rewards scandal, outrage, and status-seeking behavior, pushing reporters toward noisier framing. Tech company employees often do not understand what reporters stand for, so negative coverage feels like unexplained hostility. Facebook is too large to reduce to a single moral verdict; it is both useful and harmful at massive scale. Facebook’s lack of external accountability is a core issue because Zuckerberg’s control limits meaningful intervention. Public pressure can influence Facebook more than people think, but it is not a substitute for true accountability or regulation. Breaking up Instagram and WhatsApp could restore competition and make the ecosystem easier to govern. Newsletter writing works better than social-media-driven reporting because it encourages context, humility, and direct reader trust.

Data Points: Major tech algorithms shaping press: 3 - Newton identifies Google, Facebook, and Twitter as the three dominant algorithms reshaping the American press. Newsletter length/frequency: 4-5 columns per week - Newton says writing The Interface regularly helps build audience trust and clarify his worldview. The Interface audience: 20,000+ subscribers - The host references the newsletter’s sizable following during the conversation. Facebook market power: 3 billion users - Newton contrasts managing Facebook’s vast scale with a smaller, potentially more governable platform. Facebook user base example: 1 billion vs 3 billion - Newton suggests a smaller social platform might be easier to manage than Facebook’s full scale. CEO control: majority control over the board - Used to explain Facebook’s unusually low external accountability and Zuckerberg’s dominant authority. Time horizon for regulation: within 10 years - Newton predicts Facebook may face meaningful regulation over the next decade. Zuckerberg tenure speculation: 25 years running the company - Used in a lightning-round question about whether Zuckerberg will still be CEO in 10 years. Potential departure window for Sandberg: within 2 years - Newton says he does not expect Sheryl Sandberg to remain at Facebook long term. Social apps used most: Twitter, Instagram, Tinder - Newton lists his most-used social apps, noting increased Instagram use and pandemic-era Tinder use.

Pivotal Quotes: "I think the tech press is really awesome." — Casey Newton: Newton’s direct defense of tech journalism at the start of the interview. "There are sort of like three algorithms that have reshaped the American press in ways that we are just now starting to confront." — Casey Newton: He explains how Google, Facebook, and Twitter alter incentives and erode trust. "I would spin them off into public companies... I would reintroduce competition into the marketplace." — Casey Newton: Newton proposes breaking up Instagram and WhatsApp as a structural remedy for Facebook’s power.

Implications: Listeners should see tech coverage as a product of platform incentives, not just reporter bias. The episode suggests that trust, nuance, and competition are key fixes—and that newsletters may be a healthier model for digital journalism.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Big Technology Podcast

The Big Technology Podcast takes you behind the scenes in the tech world featuring interviews with plugged-in insiders and outside agitators. Alex Kantrowitz, a Silicon Valley journalist who's interviewed the world's top tech CEOs — from Mark Zuckerberg to Larry Ellison — is the host.

View all episodes from Big Technology Podcast