Patrick Boyle on Finance
Patrick Boyle on Finance

Is This a Golden Age of Fraud?

Send us a textA podcast about how "passive income" money-making scams seem to have taken over the internet, and the economic implications of such scams.Patrick's Books:Statistics For The Trading Floor: https://amzn.to/3eerLA0Derivatives For The Trading Floor: https://amzn.to/3cjsyPFCo

Featured Speakers

Patrick Boyle Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode argues that fraud flourishes during periods of financial exuberance and is often exposed only after a downturn. It examines pandemic-relief theft, Ponzi schemes, online “passive income” pitches, influencer incentives, and the economic concept of the “bezel”—illusory wealth that eventually disappears. The host urges investors to be especially skeptical when markets are booming and warns that households may ultimately bear the costs of fraud.

Main Topics: Fraud cycles and market excess: Drawing on historical episodes from the 1920s through the 2008 crisis, the episode argues that fraud tends to grow during booms and come to light when markets turn, after which enforcement and regulation arrive too late to prevent many losses. Pandemic relief fraud and its scale: The transcript describes widespread theft of pandemic relief funds, including the use of dead people's and prisoners' identities, and notes that overwhelmed agencies face a vast backlog of actionable leads. Online grifting and passive-income claims: The host criticizes online gurus who sell courses, stock picks, and claims of effortless earnings from trends such as dropshipping, crypto, and AI. The episode emphasizes that investing requires capital and entrepreneurship usually requires substantial work and carries a high risk of failure. Influencer incentives and misleading financial content: Financial influencers earn from views, creating incentives to cover fashionable, attention-grabbing investments rather than sound or less sensational ideas. The episode also discusses companies' adjusted earnings presentations and share-based compensation as possible ways to obscure weak profitability. The “bezel” and how fraud losses are absorbed: Using John Kenneth Galbraith's term, the episode explains how apparent wealth can persist while a fraud remains undiscovered. When the gap between recorded and real wealth closes, losses may be shifted over time through taxes, low deposit rates, bailouts, or unemployment. Investor vigilance and trust: The closing advice is to be most alert when markets are exuberant and people fear missing out. Trust supports economic growth, while fraud and unproductive investment ultimately undermine real wealth and can impose costs on ordinary households.

Key Arguments: Fraud often follows the financial cycle: booms encourage complacency and create opportunities for schemes, while downturns expose losses. The episode cites the collapse of Kruger and Toll and later discoveries following the dot-com bubble and global financial crisis. A rising volume of reported fraud is concerning, but it may reflect fraud being uncovered after losses or schemes unwind; in either case, the eventual costs can be borne by people beyond the original victims. Many “passive income” pitches misrepresent self-employment or investment as effortless. Investment income requires substantial starting capital, while building a business takes hard work and often fails. Online financial content is shaped by attention-based business models. Influencers have a stronger incentive to discuss trending assets that attract views than to recommend less exciting investments. The “bezel” describes wealth that appears to exist while a fraud or unproductive investment remains hidden. Its disappearance reverses the apparent boost to prosperity, and governments or financial systems may spread the losses across households. Investors should be especially skeptical during market booms, when fear of missing out is strongest and fraud can remain concealed behind rising asset prices.

Data Points: Increase in consumer losses to fraud: 30% - The FTC report cited in the episode said consumer losses to fraud grew by this amount last year. Increase in reports of fraud: 16.3% - The episode gives this as the increase in fraud reports in the prior year. Potential pandemic-relief funds stolen: More than $280 billion - An AP analysis cited in the episode estimated that fraudsters potentially stole this amount in pandemic relief funding. Estimated fraud in two SBA programs: Over $100 billion - The Small Business Administration's estimate, as reported in the transcript. Actionable fraud-lead backlog: More than 80,000 leads; close to 100 years of investigative work - The episode says the SBA was overwhelmed by investigations and had this backlog. Kruger and Toll securities' dividend yield: Over 20% - The securities were popular in the 1920s; dividends were paid from capital rather than profits, and the company was described as a Ponzi-like scheme. Small-business owners' working hours: Twice the hours of the average wage earner - A New York Enterprise Report survey is cited to counter the idea that running a business is passive income. The Four Hour Work Week reach: Four years on the New York Times bestseller list; translated into 40 languages; over 2 million copies sold - The episode describes the book's influence after its 2007 publication. Estimated reduction in real debt cost in China: More than 50% to 60% - The episode says low deposit rates and debt rollovers in the early 2000s helped amortize banking-system bad debt over a decade or more.

Pivotal Quotes: "Bull markets can lead to complacency and sometimes even gullibility." — Patrick Boyle: A concise statement of why investors should be alert during periods of rising asset prices. "The bezel represents recorded or perceived wealth that does not actually exist as real wealth or productive capacity" — Patrick Boyle, summarizing Michael Pettis: Defines the central concept used to explain how fraud and unproductive investment can inflate apparent prosperity. "Panics don't destroy capital, they merely reveal the extent to which it has been Previously destroyed by its betrayal into hopelessly unproductive works." — John Mills, quoted by Patrick Boyle: The closing historical observation frames market crashes as moments when earlier waste and losses become visible.

Implications: Investors should distrust effortless-return promises and be most vigilant during market euphoria. Regulators often uncover fraud after damage is done, and the eventual losses can spread beyond scammers and direct victims to households through taxes, financial repression, bailouts, or unemployment.

From the Episode

To roost. As Pettus points out in his excellent piece on this topic, you can't know who will be faced with the bill for a fraud, especially if the bill gets large enough, as governments then decide how to allocate the loss. Bull markets can lead to complacency and sometimes even gullibility. When asset prices fall, a lot of fraud is often uncovered. This was the case after the 1929 crash after the savings on. loan crisis after the dot-com bubble burst and after the credit crunch. Crypto scammers are only beginning to be rounded up now after the collapse of FTX. As an investor, you should aim to be most vigilant at times of market excess when you see others rushing in worried that they'll miss the party. As John Mills wrote in 1867, panics don't destroy capital, they merely reveal the extent to which it has been Previously destroyed by its betrayal into hopelessly unproductive works. Hopefully, the statistics of growing fraud released by the FTC don't indicate a real increase in fraudulent activity in the economy right now, and instead reflect its discovery as some of the fraud has disappeared over the last year, as in general economies grow faster and life is more pleasant the more that individuals can trust each other.

John Mills · at 20:28

To get unemployment checks, often collecting them in multiple states. The Small Business Administration estimates fraud in two of their programs at over $100 billion. The names of celebrities, entertainers, and CEOs can be found on the list of those charged. The SBA are overwhelmed with investigations and say that they're dealing with a backlog of more than 80,000 actionable fraud leads, which is close to a 100 years worth of investigative work. The disturbing thing about the story was how many ordinary people decided to turn to fraud during the pandemic. The hedge fund manager Jim Chanus argues that we're living through a golden age of fraud. He believes that the fraud cycle follows the business and financial cycle, and that at market peaks, there's the most fraud going on in an economy, which is only a exposed once there's a downturn. There is some evidence to support his claims too. The most widely held securities in America during the 1920s were the stocks and bonds of Kruger and Toll, a Swedish match conglomerate. The reason people invested was that the securities were sold in small denominations and paid high dividends of over 20%. The dividends were being paid out of capital rather than profits, and the business

Jim Chanos · at 3:28

Before 2007, they were actually money that they had borrowed from themselves. Of course, the bezel always disappears when the fraud is discovered. Hyman Minsky explained that over periods of prolonged prosperity, the economy transits from financial relations that make for a stable system to financial relations that make for an unstable system, because the bezel is, by definition, temporary. At some point, the bezel will. Be eliminated and its elimination will reverse the earlier boost to the economy. When that happens, what appeared to be a virtuous cycle becomes a vicious cycle. Michael Pettis adds to this that the bezel doesn't have to vanish as soon as it's discovered. It can be eliminated much more slowly, as the gap between reality and the growth expectation implicit in the price of an asset is slowly amortized. When this happens, though, loss associated with the bezel is effectively eliminated through often hidden transfers that force the loss onto one economic sector or another. Regulators, he points out, might bail out the losers, especially if they threaten the banking system, and governments might then raise taxes to cover the bailout or distort interest rates in ways that allow banks to profit artificially at the expense of depositors and borrowers.

Michael Pettis · at 16:58
🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Patrick Boyle on Finance

This podcast is all about quantitative finance and financial history. Subscribe to hear about financial markets, derivatives, and how investors use quantitative tools from statistics and corporate finance theory. Included are interviews with some of the most interesting thinkers in finance. Occasional longer form financial documentaries, open up fascinating elements of financial markets history. Patrick Boyle is a quantitative hedge fund manager, a university professor, and a former investment banker. To contact Patrick visit http://onfinance.org Find Patrick on YouTube at: https://www.youtube.com/c/PatrickBoyleOnFinance

View all episodes from Patrick Boyle on Finance