Intelligence Squared
Intelligence Squared

James Comey in Conversation with Emily Maitlis on Speaking Truth To Power

When President Trump sacked James Comey as FBI Director in May last year, he ignited a political firestorm with huge implications for American democracy. Comey’s dismissal led to the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller to look at possible links between the Russian government and the Trump

Featured Speakers

James Comey Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: James Comey discusses his ethical framework and the 2016 election decisions that made him one of its central figures: opening and publicly explaining the Clinton email investigation, reopening it days before the vote after new emails were found, and navigating repeated contacts with Donald Trump. He defends his actions as aimed at institutional transparency and FBI independence, while acknowledging mistakes, damage, and the lasting controversy around his role.

Main Topics: Ethical leadership and institutional integrity (Priority: 5/5): Comey frames the book and interview around choosing what is right over what is politically expedient, arguing that leaders must protect trust in institutions even when choices are painful. Clinton email investigation and public disclosure (Priority: 5/5): He explains why the FBI investigated Clinton's use of an unclassified email system for classified information, why he announced aspects publicly, and why his 'extremely careless' wording caused controversy. October 2016 reopening of the Clinton case (Priority: 5/5): Comey recounts the hardest decision of his career: whether to tell Congress and the public that the FBI had found new emails on Anthony Weiner's laptop shortly before the election. Trump, loyalty, and possible obstruction (Priority: 5/5): He describes private meetings with Donald Trump, including the loyalty request and the Flynn conversation, and says he believed Trump asked him to drop the investigation. Russia interference and the Steele dossier (Priority: 4/5): Comey discusses the FBI's Russia counterintelligence work, the information given to Trump about the dossier, and his view that Russia sought to divide and weaken U.S. democracy. Public trust, media, and the 'sleeping giant' (Priority: 4/5): He argues that America periodically reacts to moral shocks, such as child separation policies, and that public engagement is needed to defend core democratic values.

Key Arguments: Comey says he did not make decisions based on electoral impact; he weighed which option was least harmful to the FBI and public trust. He argues the Clinton email probe was about mishandling classified information on an unclassified system, not simply about using Gmail. He says Loretta Lynch's 'matter' language and Obama’s public comments undermined confidence in a credible, independent closure of the case. He justifies the October 28 disclosure by saying concealment would have destroyed trust in the FBI once Congress had been told the case was closed. He distinguishes the Clinton and Russia inquiries: Clinton was the public target of a closed case, while the Russia case was a counterintelligence investigation not focused on Trump personally. He believes Trump asked him for loyalty and to drop the Flynn inquiry, and that he documented these conversations to protect the FBI and himself. He insists the FBI should not be influenced by who might win an election; acting that way would make it 'just another partisan tribe.' He warns that Russian active measures will continue in future elections and that the U.S. was not adequately prepared. He argues public service remains worthwhile and urges younger people not to withdraw from civic life despite the political climate.

Data Points: Comey's book sales: over 1 million copies - A Higher Loyalty had sold worldwide since publication. July 2015: start of Clinton email investigation - Comey says the FBI opened the inquiry after a referral from the Intelligence Community Inspector General. 10 months: approximate duration of investigation before the first public closure - Comey says the FBI investigated Clinton's emails for about ten months before the July 2016 press conference. July 2016: first public conclusion of the Clinton investigation - He held the press conference calling Clinton 'extremely careless' but not criminal. 12 days before the election: time when the case was reopened publicly - Comey describes the October 28 dilemma after new emails were found on Anthony Weiner's laptop. Hundreds of thousands: emails found on Weiner's laptop - The new discovery triggered the decision to reopen the case. 30,000: emails initially turned over to the State Department - Comey contrasts the original batch with the later larger cache. 6,000: unique emails after deduplication - Comey says FBI technical staff later reduced the review set from hundreds of thousands to about 6,000 unique emails. 19: people charged by Mueller at the time of the interview - Comey cites the number of charges publicly known from the special counsel's work. Upper 30s to around 40%: Trump approval range referenced - Comey discusses Trump's support as historically low but durable. 36–37%: Nixon approval on resignation day - Used as a comparison point for Trump's support among a committed minority. 2013: Miss Universe Moscow trip year in the dossier allegation - Comey references the salacious dossier claim about Trump in Moscow.

Pivotal Quotes: "What is ethical leadership? How do you do what is right instead of what is politically expedient?" — Emily Maitlis (introductory framing of Comey's book): Sets up the central theme of the conversation. "There are no rules about this, but a norm is if you can avoid action in the run-up to an election, you avoid action that might have any impact on the election." — James Comey: Comey explains the dilemma he faced in October 2016. "If I ever start making calls that way, we're just another partisan tribe." — James Comey: He rejects the idea that the FBI should base decisions on political consequences.

Implications: The interview underscores how fragile trust in law enforcement becomes during elections and how transparency can collide with neutrality. It also warns that foreign interference and democratic polarization remain unresolved threats.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Intelligence Squared

View all episodes from Intelligence Squared