Tech Wont Save Us
Tech Wont Save Us

Keep Capitalism Out of Space w/ Chanda Prescod-Weinstein

Paris Marx is joined by Chanda Prescod-Weinstein to discuss the science behind the new space telescope, the problems with the billionaire space race, and why we need to challenge the capitalist and colonial forces driving the the effort to commercialize space.Chanda Prescod-Weinstein is the author o

Featured Speakers

Paris Marx HostChanda Prescott Weinstein Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode pairs a scientific explanation of the James Webb Space Telescope’s early findings with a sharp critique of how space is being shaped by capitalism, nationalism, and colonial logics. Chanda Prescott Weinstein argues that space science can be beautiful and valuable, but the current push toward privatized space, satellite monopolies, lunar mining, and billionaire-driven “space futures” serves narrow interests rather than the public.

Main Topics: James Webb Space Telescope discoveries (Priority: 5/5): Weinstein explains how JWST images reveal gravitational lensing, dark matter’s distribution, and possibly unexpectedly early galaxy formation, showing how the telescope can advance cosmology and exoplanet research. Dark matter and particle cosmology (Priority: 5/5): She describes her research on the origin and evolution of spacetime, especially the unresolved nature of dark matter and how observations can help infer invisible structures. Space as a public good vs. privatized infrastructure (Priority: 5/5): The conversation contrasts NASA’s public framing of the telescope as ‘ours’ with SpaceX, Blue Origin, and other billionaires’ control over launches, satellites, and the night sky. Capitalism, nationalism, and colonialism in space (Priority: 5/5): Weinstein argues that U.S. space policy has long fused nationalism with capitalism, and that current agendas extend manifest destiny into space through commercialization, lunar mining, and resource extraction. Funding, basic science, and political priorities (Priority: 4/5): She critiques how scientific funding is shaped by utility narratives, military history, and shifting political definitions of ‘basic’ science, arguing researchers must justify work in broader cultural and ethical terms. International collaboration and institutional change (Priority: 4/5): The discussion covers the International Space Station, Russia’s reduced role, and how private U.S. firms are reshaping what used to be publicly and internationally managed space infrastructure. Decolonial and Indigenous approaches to space (Priority: 5/5): The episode closes by emphasizing that anti-colonial and Indigenous perspectives, including Maunakea resistance and land-back struggles, offer essential frameworks for rethinking science and space governance.

Key Arguments: JWST’s deep-field images are scientifically valuable not just because they are beautiful, but because distortions from gravitational lensing let scientists infer the presence and distribution of dark matter. The red, distant galaxy candidates seen by JWST may imply that large galaxies formed earlier than current models predict, challenging assumptions in galaxy formation and broader physics. Space exploration is often framed as public or universal, but actual control is concentrated among governments, defense institutions, and billionaires who shape priorities without broad democratic input. SpaceX satellite constellations create major, unregulated harms for astronomy, the night sky, and potentially non-human species, while being sold as socially beneficial rural internet infrastructure. NASA’s and governments’ current space agendas are entangled with nationalism and capitalism; the historical shift from Apollo-era competition to today’s commercialization is part of the same logic of expansion. Funding decisions in physics are political and historically tied to military utility, especially the Manhattan Project legacy; basic science is not a neutral category. Calls to ‘extend consciousness to another planet’ ignore that Earth’s ecological and social problems will travel with us, and that we still cannot sustain balance on our own planet. Decolonial and Indigenous frameworks are necessary because space science cannot be separated from colonial histories and present-day struggles over land, sovereignty, and resource control.

Data Points: Dark matter share of normally gravitating matter: 80% to 85% - Weinstein says most of the matter in the universe is invisible dark matter. JWST deep-field exposure time: 12 and a half hours - Describes the telescope’s deep-field image as a long exposure revealing many galaxies. Satellite megaconstellation scale: tens of thousands of satellites - She notes SpaceX plans to place huge numbers of satellites in the sky. Historical timeframe for western space frameworks: last 500 years - She argues people should look beyond Western frameworks of the last five centuries. U.S. space program framing: first woman and first person of color on the moon - Cites NASA’s Artemis messaging as a marketing frame for renewed lunar missions. International Space Station collaboration window: around 60 years - Refers to the broader continuity of nationalism/capitalism in space policy since Apollo-era competition.

Pivotal Quotes: "Capitalism requires endless expansion to live." — Paris Marks: Opening framing line for the episode’s critique of space commercialization and extraction. "I think that capitalism requires endless expansion to live. And so they need to feed the beast, and they're now planning to feed the moon to the beast." — Chanda Prescott Weinstein: Summarizes her argument that lunar and planetary mining extend capitalist destruction beyond Earth. "Fuck colonialism, right?" — Chanda Prescott Weinstein: Her blunt rejection of colonial logic as the show turns to lunar mining, Artemis, and space privatization.

Implications: Listeners are urged to see space not as an escape hatch or billionaire frontier, but as a public, ethical, and ecological domain requiring regulation, democratized science funding, and decolonial stewardship.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Tech Wont Save Us

Silicon Valley wants to shape our future, but why should we let it? Every Thursday, Paris Marx is joined by a new guest to critically examine the tech industry, its big promises, and the people behind them. Tech Won’t Save Us challenges the notion that tech alone can drive our world forward by showing that separating tech from politics has consequences for us all, especially the most vulnerable. It’s not your usual tech podcast.

View all episodes from Tech Wont Save Us