Episode Summary
Executive Summary: Kim Lew, President and CEO of Columbia Investment Management Company, manages the university's $13.6 billion endowment and shares her journey from the Bronx to leading an Ivy League endowment. She emphasizes a risk allocation approach over traditional asset allocation, values mission-driven investing, and maintains optimism about private markets, especially venture capital, despite market volatility. Her leadership philosophy centers on intellectual curiosity, team diversity, and future-proofing investments by considering long-term societal and technological trends.
Main Topics: Career Journey and Mentorship (Priority: 5/5): Kim Lew recounts her path from Bronx High School of Science to Harvard Business School, highlighting the role of mentors like Betty Fagan who provided crucial support and taught her that the best technology doesn't always win—the best business does. Philosophy of Risk and Portfolio Construction (Priority: 5/5): CIMC operates as a 'risk allocator' rather than an asset allocator, using custom risk benchmarks, Monte Carlo simulations, and scenario analysis to manage volatility while ensuring the endowment supports the university's budget. Private Markets and Venture Capital Outlook (Priority: 4/5): Despite current challenges, Lew remains bullish on private markets, arguing that disciplined capital and a focus on innovation in the US will drive long-term outperformance, especially in venture capital. Leadership and Team Structure (Priority: 4/5): Lew transformed the team from a generalist hub-and-spoke model to a specialist structure, emphasizing diverse perspectives, shared responsibility for risk identification, and a culture where every voice is heard. Mission-Driven Investing and Values (Priority: 4/5): The endowment expresses Columbia's values around climate and diversity without compromising return objectives, viewing these as potential return drivers through inefficiencies and untapped talent. Future-Proofing the Portfolio (Priority: 3/5): Lew discusses the need to anticipate long-term trends like de-globalization, the impact of passive investing, and technological shifts such as AI and space exploration, and work backwards to inform current investment decisions.
Key Arguments: Endowments and foundations differ fundamentally: endowments must manage volatility to support fixed budgets, while foundations manage liquidity due to variable payouts. A risk allocation framework offers flexibility because it does not constrain the portfolio to fixed asset allocation targets, especially important with illiquid private investments. Venture capital remains attractive because US innovation culture and infrastructure are resilient, and the current capital discipline means only the best entrepreneurs will start companies. The 5% yield on risk-free assets provides a floor, allowing the equity book to take more risk while waiting for private market returns to materialize. Great investors will be made in the current market because it allows for differentiation and expression of conviction, unlike the previous growth-only environment. Understanding unintended consequences of market structures (e.g., passive investing's impact on large cap beta) is crucial for portfolio construction. Diverse teams improve risk identification because individuals cannot self-regulate their own biases; an outside voice is essential.
Data Points: Endowment Size: $13.6 billion - Managed by Kim Lew as President and CEO of Columbia Investment Management Company Return Objective: 8% to 8.5% - Nominal return target for the endowment to meet budgetary expectations and growth needs Foundation Payout Rate: 5% - Typical payout rate for foundations like Carnegie Corporation, where volatility is less of a concern Fixed Costs at Carnegie: 13% - Fixed costs at Carnegie Corporation, illustrating why volatility is less problematic for foundations Current Risk-Free Rate: 5% - Return on risk-free assets, which allows the public equity book to take more risk while private markets mature
Pivotal Quotes: "The only way you're going to be good at this is if you take chances. So you have to actually make some investments and you have to be brave enough to do that. Anything you get wrong, I can fix." — Betty Fagan (as quoted by Kim Lew): Kim Lew recalls the crucial mentorship from Betty Fagan at the Ford Foundation, who gave her the confidence to invest in technology even without domain expertise. "We are risk allocators as opposed to asset allocators, meaning we don't start out with a target asset allocation that we're trying to get to. Instead, we think about how much overall risk we're willing to take in the portfolio and we try to diversify those sources of risk." — Kim Lew: Explaining the core investment philosophy at CIMC, which differentiates it from many peers. "The best technology doesn't always win. The best business wins." — Betty Fagan (as quoted by Kim Lew): Kim Lew shares how Betty Fagan reframed her understanding of investing in technology, focusing on business fundamentals rather than technical details.
Implications: For institutional investors, the conversation underscores the value of flexible risk frameworks, long-term commitment to private markets, and building diverse teams with strong cultures. It also highlights the need to anticipate structural market changes and societal shifts to future-proof portfolios.
About Value Investing with Legends
Value investing is more than an investment strategy — it's a fundamental way of thinking about finance. Value investing was developed in the 1920s at Columbia Business School by professors Benjamin Graham and David Dodd, MS '21. The authors of the classic text, Security Analysis, Graham and Dodd were the very pioneers of their field and their security analysis principles provided the first rational basis for investment decisions. Despite the vast and volatile changes in the economy and securities markets during the last several decades, value investing has proven to be the most successful money management strategy ever developed. Value investors' success over the second half of the twentieth century proved not only the validity of the value approach, but its preeminence over even the most widely taught and practiced modern investment theory, which was developed in the 1950s and '60s and remains dominant even today. Our mission today is to promote the study and practice of Graham & Dodd's original investing principles and to improve investing with world-class education, research, and practitioner-academic dialogue. In this podcast you will hear from some of the world's greatest investors, their views on the investment management industry, how they developed their investment process and how they see the field changing over time.