Odd Lots
Odd Lots

Lots More with Matt Levine and Mike Mackenzie

For those who can't get enough Odd Lots, we're now offering you... "Lots More." This new podcast show, appearing on Fridays, will see hosts Tracy Alloway and Joe Weisenthal chatting with some of your favorite Odd Lots guests about the latest breaking news and the biggest themes o

Featured Speakers

Bloomberg HostMike McKenzie GuestMatt Levine Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode centers on the Treasury basis trade and whether it poses a renewed systemic risk after recent bond-market volatility. Matt Levine and Mike McKenzie argue the trade is a plumbing function of modern Treasury intermediation—now dominated more by hedge funds and algos than primary dealers—and that higher rates, supply pressure, and Fed policy have changed the landscape, making the main risk broader Treasury-market fragility rather than the basis trade alone.

Main Topics: The basis trade explained (Priority: 5/5): The hosts define the trade as buying Treasuries and selling related futures to capture the small spread, typically using leverage. They frame it as a necessary transformation in the Treasury market rather than an exotic anomaly. Whether the basis trade is a systemic risk (Priority: 5/5): They debate if the trade could unwind violently like in March 2020. McKenzie is skeptical this time, while Levine emphasizes structural fragility and the possibility of a Fed backstop if stress becomes severe. Evolution of Treasury-market intermediation (Priority: 4/5): The discussion highlights how post-crisis regulation pushed primary dealers back, creating space for hedge funds, HFTs, and electronic market makers to intermediate Treasuries and futures. Bond-market volatility and supply pressure (Priority: 5/5): Speakers argue the real story is a broad rates shock driven by Fed tightening, Treasury issuance/refunding needs, and a sustained selloff in bonds, not just the basis trade. Lessons from past crises and regulatory reaction (Priority: 4/5): They compare the current moment with March 2020, LTCM, and the taper tantrum, criticizing a tendency among regulators and commentators to fight the last war. Credit markets and regional bank spillovers (Priority: 3/5): McKenzie and Levine discuss whether another thing could break next, including regional banks or credit. McKenzie thinks private credit and private equity have changed credit-market dynamics, reducing the odds of a classic blow-up.

Key Arguments: The basis trade is fundamentally an intermediation service: long-only investors use futures to gain duration exposure, while leveraged hedge funds absorb the other side by holding bonds and shorting futures. A repeat of the March 2020 basis-trade blowup is less likely because bond markets have already lived through two years of volatile rate moves, so surprise margin shocks should be smaller. The broader Treasury market remains structurally fragile because repo, futures margin, and leverage all depend on confidence that liquidity will hold most of the time, with the Fed ultimately as backstop. Treasury market intermediation has shifted away from primary dealers to hedge funds, HFTs, and newer market makers due to post-2007 capital and regulatory constraints. The most important current risk may be the combination of heavy Treasury supply, a higher-for-longer Fed, and investor losses in long-duration bonds, not the basis trade in isolation. Credit markets may be more resilient than expected because private equity and private credit funds now hold more information and capital, reducing the likelihood of a traditional public-market credit unwind.

Data Points: March 2020 basis trade blowup: Reference point, not current event - Used as the main historical comparison for Treasury-market stress and the basis trade 2020 Treasury market intervention: Fed stepped in and announced a corporate bond buying program - Illustrates how severe Treasury-market dysfunction can force central-bank action Fed tightening last year: More than 500 basis points - Described as the sharpest hiking cycle in decades and a major driver of bond losses Fed hikes in 2022: Several 75 bps hikes - Cited to show the speed and severity of policy tightening 10-year-plus Treasury performance YTD: Nearly -9% - Mike McKenzie cited this as evidence that long-duration bond investors are underwater 10-year-plus Treasury performance last year: -29% - Used to emphasize the scale of the bond bear market Rise in term premium: Biggest rise; outpaced May 2013 taper tantrum - McKenzie said this week’s move was exceptionally large by historical standards Self-driving car trip duration: About 12 hours before Joe was heard from - Anecdote about Joe’s first ride in a self-driving car during the Austin trip Podcast length format: Five minutes or less - From the Stock Movers promo embedded in the transcript

Pivotal Quotes: "I think the real story in the bond market now is a lot of investors are long bond. And they're underwater." — Mike McKenzie: McKenzie argues the main issue is broad duration losses, not just basis-trade mechanics "I think of the treasury market as being a sort of like parallel to the banking system" — Matt Levine: Levine explains Treasury intermediation as inherently fragile but normally stable with a lender of last resort "They always fight the last war" — Mike McKenzie: Used to criticize regulators for focusing on hedge funds and LTCM-style risks rather than current market structure

Implications: Listeners should watch Treasury supply, Fed policy, and duration losses more than a single trade. The market can function under stress, but persistent volatility raises the odds of a broader rates or liquidity event.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Odd Lots

Bloomberg's Joe Weisenthal and Tracy Alloway analyze the weird patterns, the complex issues and the newest market crazes. Join the conversation every Tuesday and Thursday for interviews with the most interesting minds in finance, economics and markets.

View all episodes from Odd Lots