Episode Summary
Executive Summary: The discussion centered on emerging markets’ weak start to 2021 after a constructive January outlook. Jen Roth argued EM underperformed due to a broad global fixed-income repricing, higher U.S. rates, a stronger dollar, and idiosyncratic shocks in places like Turkey and Brazil, while new COVID variants added pressure. She sees a better second-half setup if U.S. rates remain fairly priced and EM can offer either carry or real growth.
Main Topics: Q1 2021 EM Underperformance (Priority: 5/5): EM assets fell sharply in the first quarter, with both external and local indices posting losses amid a global rates selloff and stronger dollar. U.S. Exceptionalism and Fed/Rates Repricing (Priority: 5/5): Investors debated whether strong U.S. growth will continue to dominate or is already priced in, affecting appetite for non-U.S. assets like EM. Dollar, Commodities, and EM Linkage (Priority: 4/5): A firmer U.S. dollar changed the usual EM/commodity feedback loop, with commodity strength now driven more by developed-market demand than EM demand. COVID Variants and Regional Volatility (Priority: 4/5): Variant-driven infection surges in South Africa, Brazil, and India created market volatility and threatened economic reopening in affected EM countries. Idiosyncratic Country Risks (Priority: 3/5): Country-specific issues, especially in Turkey and Brazil, compounded broader EM weakness and kept investors cautious. Second-Half 2021 Outlook for EM (Priority: 5/5): Roth said EM could improve if U.S. rates stabilize and EM offers meaningful carry or genuine growth, drawing both dedicated and crossover investors.
Key Arguments: EM’s poor Q1 performance was not purely EM-specific; it reflected a global fixed-income repricing that also hit U.S. credit. Higher U.S. fiscal-growth and inflation expectations pushed rates higher, strengthened the dollar, and compressed risk premia across EM. There are two competing market views: either U.S. exceptionalism continues and caps EM upside, or U.S. optimism is already priced in and non-U.S. assets become more attractive. The usual weaker-dollar/stronger-commodity/stronger-EM pattern may reassert itself, but only when EM growth also shows clear improvement. New COVID variants are a key short-term drag on several EM markets, even if lockdowns are politically less favored. For the rest of 2021, EM needs a clear value proposition—either attractive carry or convincing local growth—to regain broader investor interest.
Data Points: EM external index Q1 return: -4.74% - First-quarter performance cited by Jen Roth EM local index Q1 return: -6.67% - First-quarter performance cited by Jen Roth S&P 500 Q1 return: +5.77% - Used as comparison showing EM lagged U.S. equities Podcast recording date: Thursday, April 22, 2021 - Recorded before release on April 23, 2021 Reference to U.S. growth outlook: Next month or so - Period during which strong U.S. data were expected to support exceptionalism U.S. rates market view: More fairly priced - Basis for reduced risk of a taper-tantrum-like move
Pivotal Quotes: "Unfortunately, you know, that conversation was far from correct." — Jen Roth: Reflecting on the more constructive January outlook for EM versus the weak Q1 outcome "The weakness seen in EM was not about EM per se." — Jen Roth: Explaining that EM’s poor performance was largely driven by broader global rates and risk repricing "The challenge is going to be providing a true value proposition for the asset class." — Jen Roth: Her framework for what EM needs in order to improve in the second half of 2021
Implications: Listeners should expect EM sentiment to remain sensitive to U.S. rates, dollar moves, and variant-related growth risks. A clearer second-half opportunity may emerge only if EM growth and carry become more compelling.
About Goldman Sachs Exchanges
In each episode of "Exchanges," people from the firm share their insights on developments shaping industries, markets and the global economy.