In Our Time
In Our Time

Modernist Utopias

Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss the mad, bad world of modern utopias. "I want to gather together about twenty souls," wrote D H Lawrence in 1915, "and sail away from this world of war and squalor and find a little colony where there shall be no money but a sort of communism as necessa

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The discussion traces how utopian writing from the late 19th to early 20th century shifted from optimistic egalitarian visions to darker, exclusionary, and often eugenic projects. The speakers connect this turn to industrialization, mass society, technology, women’s writing, and the rise of planning, arguing that many “utopias” became blueprints for dystopia—especially in H.G. Wells, Huxley, Orwell, and related modernist works.

Main Topics: Shift from optimistic to pessimistic utopias: John Carey argues that late-19th-century utopias emphasized equality and shared abundance, while early-20th-century utopias became more exclusive, anxious, and punitive. Industrialization, mass society, and modern technology: Steve Connor links utopian thinking to the second wave of industrial change, urbanization, mass psychology, and new technologies like telephones and electric light that seemed to penetrate human life itself. Women writers and feminist utopias: Laura Marcus highlights women’s utopian writing as a response to the 'woman question,' showing how feminist aspirations, reproduction, and altered sex relations became central to imagining the future. Eugenics and subtractive utopias: The panel examines how many utopian visions became 'radically subtractive,' using eugenics, sterilization, and elimination of the 'unfit' as instruments of social perfection. Planning, Fordism, and the dystopia of organization: The speakers discuss how the idea of a fully planned society—aligned with clockwork efficiency and industrial management—fed dystopian literature such as Brave New World and We. Huxley, Orwell, and competing dystopian visions: Brave New World and 1984 are contrasted: Orwell represents overt political oppression, while Huxley presents a more ambiguous dystopia of pleasure, consumerism, and managed happiness. Why utopian imagination declined after totalitarianism: The conversation suggests Nazism and Soviet planning contaminated the utopian ideal, making grand visions of remaking humanity feel dangerous and morally suspect.

Key Arguments: Late-19th-century utopias were generally egalitarian and hopeful, while early-20th-century utopias turned exclusive and pessimistic. Industrialization created mass society, large cities, and collective psychology, which made writers think in terms of populations rather than individuals. New technologies such as electricity and telephones helped inspire utopian ideas by changing sensory experience and daily life. Women’s utopian writing centered on reproduction, maternity, and the 'woman question,' often imagining futures not yet permitted by society. Eugenics was not marginal but central to many utopian projects; 'improvement' often meant exclusion, sterilization, or elimination of the weak. Planned society became a dystopian motif because total organization implied coercion, coercive classification, and loss of freedom. Brave New World is presented as a dystopia of happiness and abundance, not just repression, making it more ambiguous and arguably more modern than 1984. Totalitarian attempts to realize utopia damaged the credibility of utopian thought by showing how imagination and planning could become monstrous. Future human enhancement technologies could recreate a two-tier society, with 'gene-enriched' people and everyone else. Austere, disciplined living is presented as a recurring ideal in both utopian and dystopian thought, especially in contrast to consumer excess.

Data Points: Industrial army retirement age in Looking Backward: 45 - John Carey describes Edward Bellamy’s egalitarian utopia, where workers joined at 21 and retired at 45 after earning the vote. Voting age in Bellamy’s utopia: 21 to 45 service requirement - Citizens only gained the vote after years of service in the industrial army. H.G. Wells reference year: 1901 - Wells’s Anticipations is cited as a key early-20th-century utopian text. Three racial categories targeted in Wells quote: black, brown, yellow, and dirty white races - Wells is quoted advocating that these groups 'must go' in the context of eugenic future-thinking. Year Gustave Le Bon wrote on crowds: 1895 - Connor cites Le Bon’s book as an early study of crowd psychology and mass society. Serialization year of Herland: 1915 - Gilman’s Herland was serialized in her feminist journal before later book publication. Age of the women-only society’s parthenogenesis: 2,000 years - Herland’s all-female community has existed since discovering parthenogenesis two millennia earlier. Number of sons in Mary Stopes example: 1 - Stopes disinherited her only child after his marriage to a woman she considered physically defective. Estimated readership of T.S. Eliot’s magazine: 800 - The discussion contrasts elite modernist readership with mass readership for H.G. Wells and film adaptations.

Pivotal Quotes: "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need" — John Carey (quoting Marx): Used to define the egalitarian ideal behind late-19th-century utopian thought. "the black and brown and yellow and dirty white races must go" — John Carey (quoting H.G. Wells): Illustrates the eugenic and exclusionary logic that entered early-20th-century utopian thinking. "the horror precisely of happiness" — Steve Connor: Summarizes the unsettling power of Huxley’s Brave New World as a dystopia of pleasure and managed contentment.

Implications: The episode argues that utopian thinking has not disappeared, but it is now viewed warily because grand designs can justify coercion, eugenics, and dehumanization. Modern visions of progress remain tied to choices about who gets included, enhanced, or excluded.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About In Our Time

View all episodes from In Our Time