Speaking of Psychology
Speaking of Psychology

Music and your health (SOP11)

Can music make us healthier or even smarter? Can it change how we experience pain? In this episode, former rock musician and studio producer Daniel Levitin, PhD, talks about how music changes our brain’s chemistry and affects our health. APA is currently seeking proposals for APA 2020, click here to

Featured Speakers

Daniel Levitin Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode explores how music influences mood, physiology, and health, with neuropsychologist Daniel Levitin distinguishing evidence-based music therapy from broader music interventions. He argues that music can affect pain, stress, immune function, heart rate, and respiration, but that benefits depend on the listener’s subjective response and the specific context. The discussion also debunks exaggerated claims about “Mozart makes you smarter” while noting potential cognitive and social benefits from learning and performing music.

Main Topics: Music’s effects on health and physiology: Levitin explains that music can alter brain chemistry, pain thresholds, immune function, heart rate, respiration, and blood pressure, suggesting real physiological effects beyond emotion alone. Music therapy vs. music intervention: A central distinction is made between licensed, evidence-based music therapy and broader music interventions used in research or informal therapeutic contexts. Evidence-based research and skepticism of pseudoscience: The conversation emphasizes the need for controlled experiments rather than anecdotes, noting that the field is increasingly producing more rigorous evidence. Mood regulation through music: People commonly use music to regulate mood across daily situations, such as waking up, relaxing, or preparing for social events, and the effects are often self-selected and subjective. Music, cognition, and the Mozart effect: Levitin discusses the debunking of simplistic claims that passive listening to classical music boosts intelligence, while noting some evidence for benefits from learning an instrument. Social and attentional benefits of playing music: Active music-making, especially in ensembles, may improve attention, coordination, and socialization in children, similar to the benefits of team sports.

Key Arguments: Music can influence physical systems, including pain perception, immune function, heart rate, respiration, and blood pressure. The term 'music therapy' should be reserved for licensed, evidence-based practice; other uses are better called 'music interventions.' The field is moving from anecdote and pseudoscience toward controlled experimental research. Relaxing or stimulating music works best when the listener personally perceives it that way; the effect is subjective. Music can be used for mood regulation much like people use drugs or other tools to shape emotional states. The 'Mozart effect' claims have largely been debunked; passive listening does not reliably make people smarter. Learning to play an instrument may offer attentional and social benefits that passive listening does not. Ensemble music-making may foster empathy and coordination because players must listen and adapt to others.

Data Points: Average daily music exposure: 5 hours a day - Levitin says the average person hears about five hours of music daily. Typical experimental context for music intervention: Random assignment to relaxing music, Valium, or placebo - Example of a hospital-based music intervention study design. Time in the Mozart-effect claim: 20 minutes - Refers to the old headline claim that listening to Mozart for 20 minutes improved IQ test performance.

Pivotal Quotes: "So we're already in a place and a time where people are using music as medicine." — Daniel Levitin: Describing how people naturally use music for mood and physiological regulation. "music can alter pain thresholds, that it can increase immune system function." — Daniel Levitin: Summarizing early evidence for music’s physiological effects. "The emerging picture is that not so much listening to music but learning to play an instrument and being a player can confer some advantages in other areas." — Daniel Levitin: Explaining the difference between passive listening and active music-making.

Implications: Listeners may use music more intentionally for mood and stress management, but claims should stay evidence-based. For health care and music researchers, the big opportunity is rigorously testing which musical activities help which outcomes.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Speaking of Psychology

View all episodes from Speaking of Psychology