On with Kara Swisher
On with Kara Swisher

Peter Chernin on ‘Backrooms,’ Sequel Fatigue, and Hollywood Mergers

The low-budget horror film ‘Backrooms’ is the surprise hit of the summer so far, netting more than $200 million globally in its leap from YouTube to the big screen. But among the film’s producers is a Hollywood heavyweight: Peter Chernin. As the former president and COO of News Corp. and chairman an

Featured Speakers

Peter Chernin Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Kara Swisher and Peter Chernin discuss the surprise success of Backrooms, using it as a lens on Hollywood’s need to back original ideas, young creators, and lower-budget risk-taking. Chernin argues YouTube/TikTok are talent incubators, AI is more a tool than a threat, and the bigger danger is vertical integration and aging studio leadership.

Main Topics: Backrooms as a case study in original IP (Priority: 5/5): Chernin explains why he backed the film: not because it came from YouTube, but because Kane Parsons had a rare ability to turn a meme into a compelling story and because the project resonated with young audiences. YouTube/TikTok as talent incubators (Priority: 5/5): He argues that digital platforms are the modern equivalent of prior creative incubators like Roger Corman or MTV, producing a vast pool of mediocre work and a small amount of extraordinary talent worth betting on. Hollywood’s failure to make youth-oriented originals (Priority: 4/5): Chernin says studios stopped making youth comedies, original horror, and other low-to-mid budget films for young people, leaving a gap that original projects like Backrooms can fill. AI as a creative tool, not an apocalypse (Priority: 4/5): He sees AI as likely to reduce costs, expand storytelling possibilities, and help genres like animation, documentaries, and special effects, while insisting copyright and likeness protections must be enforced. Vertical integration vs. mergers (Priority: 5/5): Chernin says the real threat is not consolidation alone but vertically integrated companies controlling production, rights, and distribution, which harms circulation, creativity, and incentives for talent. Leadership, risk, and age in entertainment (Priority: 4/5): He argues studios are run by leaders too far from younger audiences and that good executive judgment requires curiosity, young voices, and the willingness to support failure as part of creativity.

Key Arguments: Backrooms succeeded because it was a specific, original piece of IP with a strong storyteller behind it, not because Hollywood should blindly chase YouTubers. Digital platforms function as an incubator for creative talent; only a tiny fraction of what emerges there is worth adapting, so selection matters more than trend-chasing. Young audiences still want theatrical experiences, especially for original, social, eventized content; Hollywood reduced attendance by reducing the kinds of films young people want. Original horror is thriving because it feels fresh and human, not AI-generated or derivative, which makes it stand out from sequels and franchise content. AI has not yet replaced Hollywood jobs in a meaningful way, but it can lower production costs, improve preproduction, and enable new art forms and more movies to be made. The greatest structural risk to Hollywood is vertical integration, because it concentrates power, suppresses second lives for content, weakens talent incentives, and reduces creative messiness. Studios should manage risk as a portfolio: mix safe bets, medium bets, and lower-budget risky bets rather than relying only on expensive franchise films. Younger executives and creative staff are essential because the industry is separated from its audience by decades and needs people with closer cultural proximity.

Data Points: Backrooms domestic gross: more than $135 million - Kara introduces the film’s box office performance in the U.S. Backrooms worldwide gross: more than $200 million - Kara cites the film’s global earnings. Opening weekend comparison: on par with the last Star Wars installment - Used to show the film’s unexpected scale despite a much lower budget. Chernin Entertainment age: 15 years old - Chernin describes his production company’s tenure. Chernin’s production output: about 35 movies - He estimates the company’s total film output. Kane Parsons’ age when creating early Backrooms videos: 15 years old - Chernin notes the creator’s youth and early vision. Age when the deal was made: 17 or 18 - Chernin says the option/deal with Parsons came a couple of years later. Backrooms production timeline: 3 years - Chernin says the project took years of development and production. Hollywood jobs decline: 35–40% - He says jobs in Hollywood have fallen significantly, due to multiple factors. Studio movie cost: $80 million average - Chernin cites average studio film budgets today. Marketing spend: another $50 million - He adds typical marketing costs behind a studio movie. Total bet size: $130 million - Combined production and marketing example used to explain risk. Audience under 35: close to 90% - Kara cites a survey of first-weekend Backrooms ticket buyers.

Pivotal Quotes: "You’re betting on a piece of IP, but you were also betting on the ability to convert that into a different medium." — Peter Chernin: Explaining why Backrooms worked and why the project was more than a trendy YouTube adaptation. "The infrastructure of Hollywood is too old." — Peter Chernin: Discussing why studios often misread younger audiences and emerging talent. "I have no legacy. I’ll be dead." — Peter Chernin: On rejecting the idea of business legacy and focusing instead on current work and talent.

Implications: Hollywood’s next winners may come from young creators, smaller budgets, and original ideas rather than recycled franchises. AI will likely reshape production economics, but the bigger immediate threat is consolidation and control over distribution.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About On with Kara Swisher

View all episodes from On with Kara Swisher