Intelligence Squared
Intelligence Squared

Putting Peer Pressure to Work with Robert H Frank and Linda Yueh

In this week's episode Robert H. Frank, author of 'Under the Influence: Putting Peer Pressure to Work' speaks to Linda Yueh about how our social environments influence our behaviour more than we think. They discuss why behaviours from smoking to cheating are largely products of social

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode features economist Robert H. Frank discussing his book on peer pressure, arguing that human behavior is deeply shaped by social context and contagion. He shows how norms spread through networks, why policies like taxes can reshape behavior, and why individual actions—especially on climate—can ripple outward into larger social and political change.

Main Topics: Connectedness, influence, and social contagion (Priority: 5/5): Frank opens with the idea that people are linked through networks, making behavior and beliefs contagious. He uses six degrees of separation and the meme concept to show how ideas and habits spread, for good or ill. Conformity and peer pressure in everyday behavior (Priority: 5/5): Through examples like the Candid Camera waiting-room scene and FOMO in investing, Frank argues that people often conform because others seem to know something, or because social cues make behavior seem permissible. Behavioral economics vs. standard economic models (Priority: 5/5): Frank critiques models that treat decisions as isolated and purely individual, arguing instead that choices are shaped by social environments and that economists should account for behavioral externalities. Smoking as a model case for policy and contagion (Priority: 5/5): Smoking is used to illustrate how peer effects drive harmful behavior, why taxes and inconvenience helped reduce smoking, and why the social spillover matters more than secondhand smoke alone. Taxes, subsidies, and policy design (Priority: 4/5): Frank argues taxes are efficient tools for reducing harmful externalities and promoting beneficial behavior, especially when designed to be revenue-neutral and politically acceptable. Changing norms on same-sex marriage and climate action (Priority: 4/5): He cites the rapid shift in acceptance of same-sex marriage as evidence that beliefs track social consensus, then extends the logic to climate policy and the need for both individual and systemic action. How to persuade across political divides (Priority: 3/5): Frank emphasizes listening, asking good questions, and avoiding direct confrontation, suggesting that effective persuasion works by reducing defensiveness and activating shared memory and values.

Key Arguments: People are far more socially connected than we intuitively assume, so behaviors and beliefs spread through networks rather than in isolation. Not all contagious ideas are good; the most transmissible behaviors are not necessarily the most beneficial. Many behaviors that look like personal choices are responses to social context, and this context can be changed by policy. Smoking declines were driven not just by taxes and inconvenience, but by contagion: fewer smokers meant fewer smoking peers, which further reduced smoking. Taxes are preferable to blunt regulation in many cases because they are efficient, fairer, and can target harmful externalities while preserving individual flexibility. Carbon taxes should be revenue-neutral to be politically viable and to offset the burden on most households. Individuals should not dismiss their own behavior as negligible, because visible actions can influence others and help shift norms. Small personal choices can reshape identity and political commitments, which can eventually produce larger collective change. Persuasion is more effective when it starts with questions and listening rather than telling people they are wrong. Public policy should consider behavioral externalities—the way one person’s choices alter the social environment for everyone else.

Data Points: Packets sent in Milgram experiment: 96 - Robert H. Frank describes Stanley Milgram’s six-degrees experiment sending instruction packets toward a named man in Boston. Packets reaching destination: 18 - Out of about 96 packets mailed in the experiment, 18 reached the final recipient. Smoking risk increase: 25% more likely - Frank states that if a teenager’s friends who smoke rise from 20% to 30%, she becomes 25% more likely to smoke or remain a smoker. Teen smoking prevalence in Frank’s youth: 60% - He contrasts the high smoking prevalence of his youth with today’s much lower rates. Teen smoking prevalence today: 14% - Frank says his children grew up in an environment where about 14% of adults smoked in public places. Public approval of same-sex marriage in 1989: about 10% - He cites early public opinion when same-sex marriage advocacy began appearing in articles. Public approval of same-sex marriage in 2015: 70% - Frank notes current support after the Supreme Court decision and social norm shift. Carbon tax rebate estimate: 90% of voters - He argues that if carbon tax revenues were returned equally, 90% of voters would receive more in rebates than they paid.

Pivotal Quotes: "it's the situation, not the person." — Robert H. Frank: Core behavioral-economics claim explaining why social context often matters more than personality. "the mother of all cognitive illusions" — Robert H. Frank: His phrase for the mistaken belief that higher taxes would necessarily make wealthy people worse off in absolute terms. "individual actions are much more consequential than I ever realized" — Robert H. Frank: His revised view on climate-related personal choices, such as solar panels or hybrid cars, after writing the book.

Implications: The episode suggests behavior change works best by changing norms and environments, not just lecturing individuals. For policy, it supports taxes, revenue-neutral climate tools, and social-design thinking; for listeners, it reframes personal actions as catalysts for wider change.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Intelligence Squared

View all episodes from Intelligence Squared