Science Friday
Science Friday

Randall Munroe, Football Concussion Research. Sept 6, 2019, Part 2

If you’ve ever been skiing, you might have wondered how your skiis and the layer of water interact. What would happen if the slope was made out of wood or rubber? Or how would you make more snow in the most efficient way if it all melted away? These are the questions that comic artist Randall Munroe

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode centers on new research showing that football players can sustain brain injury from repeated subconcussive hits even without diagnosed concussions, with rotational forces appearing especially damaging. Guests explain helmet limits, the possible long-term link to CTE, and gaps in NFL safety standards. The program then pivots to Randall Munroe’s book on absurd problem-solving, using playful physics and engineering thought experiments to illustrate how curiosity can reveal practical and impractical solutions.

Main Topics: Subconcussive football hits and brain injury (Priority: 5/5): Researchers discuss evidence that a season of football can alter white matter even without a concussion, suggesting repetitive head impacts alone can injure the brain. Helmet safety and what protection helmets can and cannot provide (Priority: 5/5): The guests explain that helmets reduce skull fractures and catastrophic injury but do not stop the brain from moving and twisting inside the skull. Rotational acceleration as a key mechanism of injury (Priority: 5/5): The study highlights twisting motion rather than linear head-on impact as a major driver of the observed brain changes. NFL standards and the limits of current testing (Priority: 4/5): The discussion criticizes helmet rankings and testing conditions, noting many real-game impacts are not represented in lab tests. Connection between repetitive head trauma and CTE (Priority: 4/5): The guests connect their findings to post-mortem CTE research showing stronger links with repeated head hits than with concussion counts alone. Randall Munroe’s absurd scientific problem-solving (Priority: 3/5): The second half of the program features Munroe explaining how he uses exaggerated scenarios and physics to think through practical problems. Curiosity-driven science communication (Priority: 3/5): Munroe and callers discuss how playful thought experiments can teach physics, inspire students, and reveal real-world engineering constraints.

Key Arguments: A concussion is not required for football-related brain injury; repetitive subconcussive hits can still damage white matter. Helmets mainly protect against skull fracture and catastrophic injury, not the rapid acceleration and deceleration of brain tissue inside the skull. Rotational forces are likely especially important because different brain tissues have different elastic properties, creating vulnerable junctions. The NFL’s current helmet evaluation system is incomplete because many game-relevant impacts, especially helmet-to-ground and body contact, are not well tested. Post-mortem CTE studies increasingly suggest repetitive head trauma correlates more strongly with disease than the number of diagnosed concussions. The research is observational and does not yet prove how seasonal injuries translate into lifetime CTE risk, but it is concerning enough to warrant action. Munroe argues that absurd or impractical questions can still yield useful insights when analyzed with physics and real data. Several “ridiculous” ideas in Munroe’s book turned out to have historical precedents or partial real-world viability, underscoring the value of experimentation.

Data Points: Year range of public NFL concussion reporting discussed: 2012–2018 - Dr. Hirad says NFL concussion numbers have fluctuated but stayed about the same over this period. Share of concussions from untested scenarios: 70% - Dr. Hirad says about 70% of NFL concussions from 2015–2017 came from scenarios not tested in the helmet lab. Study finding: Dose-dependent effect - Dr. Mahon says players with more certain kinds of hits showed more serious brain changes than players with fewer hits. Potential number of serves to hit drone (prediction): 5–7 serves - Munroe says his model predicted Serena Williams would need about five to seven serves to hit the drone. Actual serves needed by Serena Williams: 3 serves - Munroe reports Serena Williams hit the drone in three serves. Time window of emerging scientific consensus: 5–10 years - Dr. Mahon notes the literature has increasingly linked subconcussive hits to long-term brain changes over the past five to ten years.

Pivotal Quotes: "There are no these helmets are not um cannot eliminate the risk of concussion." — Dr. Adnan Hirad: He explains that current helmets reduce some injuries but cannot eliminate concussion risk. "The twisting motions of the head are themselves sufficient to explain the kinds of changes that we're seeing in players' brains." — Dr. Brad Mahon: He emphasizes rotational acceleration as the key mechanism in the study. "What we're showing is that there's damage to white matter structure just from playing a season of football without even sustaining a concussion." — Dr. Adnan Hirad: He summarizes the central finding of the football study.

Implications: For football, safety efforts may need to shift beyond concussion detection toward reducing repetitive and rotational impacts. For listeners, the second segment shows how playful scientific modeling can reveal real constraints and inspire problem-solving.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Science Friday

View all episodes from Science Friday