Science Vs
Science Vs

Scott Kelly: How A Year in Space Changes You

This week, something different. We speak to astronaut Scott Kelly, who went up to space a man and came back a Rhesus monkey. Just kidding, that didn’t happen at all. Listen to find out the real story. PLUS: We talk to Lynn Levy, star producer of the Gimlet show The Habitat. Check out the full transc

Featured Speakers

Spotify Studios Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode follows astronaut Scott Kelly’s 340-day mission on the ISS to explore how long-term spaceflight affects the human body, from bone loss and fluid shifts to altered gene expression. It also broadens to Mars-readiness research, highlighting Earth-based simulations designed to test whether humans can survive long isolation, confinement, and teamwork in deep space.

Main Topics: Scott Kelly’s year in space (Priority: 5/5): Kelly’s record-setting 340-day stay on the International Space Station is the centerpiece, framed as NASA’s key test for future Mars missions. Physical effects of microgravity (Priority: 5/5): The episode explains how near-zero gravity can affect bones, muscles, heart function, body fluids, and eyesight, using Kelly’s experience and astronaut research. Twin study and genetics (Priority: 5/5): NASA compared Scott with his identical twin Mark to examine biological changes from spaceflight, clarifying that DNA itself did not change, but gene expression did. The psychological strain of isolation (Priority: 4/5): Kelly describes the boredom, confinement, work-sleep overlap, and emotional difficulty of being far from family while unable to leave the station. Space hazards and risk (Priority: 4/5): The episode recounts the danger posed by a fast-moving old Russian satellite and Kelly’s fear of being vaporized if it collided with the ISS. Mars analog simulations on Earth (Priority: 5/5): The show shifts to Earth-based experiments like HI-SEAS in Hawaii, Utah simulations, underwater habitats, and bedrest studies that test how humans might handle Mars missions.

Key Arguments: Long-duration spaceflight changes the body in measurable ways, especially through microgravity-induced fluid shifts, bone weakening, muscle loss, and vision issues. NASA used Scott Kelly because his identical twin provided a rare control subject for comparing biological changes before, during, and after flight. Media claims that Kelly’s DNA fundamentally changed were overstated; the real finding was changes in gene activity/expression, not DNA sequence. Preparing for Mars requires studying not just hardware but humans, since crew behavior, mental health, and teamwork are mission-critical. Earth-based analogs are necessary because we cannot ethically or practically test every Mars condition in real spaceflight.

Data Points: Duration of Scott Kelly mission: 340 days - Scott Kelly’s record-setting stay on the International Space Station NASA twin comparison: Identical twin brother Mark Kelly - Mark stayed on Earth as the genetic control for Scott’s mission Radiation exposure in space: nearly 10 times more than on Earth - NASA concerns about cancer risk during long missions ISS orbit frequency: 16 times a day - Used to explain how astronauts see 16 sunrises and 16 sunsets daily Sunrises and sunsets per day: 16 sunrises and 16 sunsets - Result of the ISS circling Earth 16 times daily Speed in orbit: 25 times the speed of sound - Describing the initial rocket ride to space Satellite speed: 35,000 miles an hour - Old Russian satellite that nearly collided with the ISS Potential proximity of satellite: within a mile - Estimated closest approach before the crew knew whether they would be hit Time to Mars and back: about 3 years - Reason NASA wanted to study long-duration spaceflight effects Reported DNA change claim: 7 percent - Media misreported that 7% of Scott Kelly’s DNA changed in space Hawaii habitat crew size: 6 volunteers - HI-SEAS Mars simulation crew living in a dome Bedrest simulation incline: 6-degree incline - Earth-based microgravity analog study

Pivotal Quotes: "I knew right then and there I would never see anything as beautiful as planet Earth again." — Scott Kelly: His reaction to seeing sunrise from orbit for the first time "If it struck the space station, I think we would have been instantly vaporized." — Scott Kelly: Describing the fear during the near-miss with space junk "The humans are a part of this whole system. And if the humans fail, the system's just as broken as if the rockets do." — Kim Binstead: Explaining why Mars simulations focus on crew performance, not just equipment

Implications: Human Mars travel will depend on understanding both biology and behavior in extreme isolation. The episode suggests that future missions need better countermeasures, better team design, and more analog testing before sending crews farther from Earth.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Science Vs

There are a lot of fads, blogs and strong opinions, but then there’s SCIENCE. Science Vs is the show from Spotify Studios that finds out what’s fact, what’s not, and what’s somewhere in between. We do the hard work of sifting through all the science so you don't have to and cover everything from 5G and ADHD, to Fluoride and Fasting Diets.

View all episodes from Science Vs