Volts
Volts

Telling the story of the grid

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.volts.wtf Ben Eidelson and Anay Shah run the Stepchange podcast, which recently put out a magisterial four-hour (!) episode on the history of the US electricity grid. I talk with them about some of the colorful characters and stories

Featured Speakers

David Roberts Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode explores the history of the electric grid through an interview with Step Change hosts Ben Idelson and Anai Shah. It focuses on how Samuel Insull turned electricity into a scalable utility by boosting load, lowering costs, and shaping the regulated monopoly model. The conversation also shows how accidental history, not master planning, created today’s grid.

Main Topics: Why the grid makes for a hard narrative (Priority: 4/5): The hosts discuss the challenge of telling a story about infrastructure rather than a company, since the grid has no single protagonist and evolves through dispersed historical processes. Samuel Insull and the creation of the utility model (Priority: 5/5): Insull is presented as the key architect of the scaled electric utility, shifting from Edison’s machine business to the business of operating a utility and building demand. Load growth and the economics of electricity (Priority: 5/5): The conversation explains Insull’s central insight: electricity becomes cheaper when capital-intensive plants are used more, so utilities should seek diverse customers and more hours of demand. Regulation, monopoly, and the public utility bargain (Priority: 5/5): Insull helped establish the compact of territorial exclusivity, regulated returns, and universal service that still underlies utility regulation today. Historical accident and unintended consequences (Priority: 4/5): The guests emphasize that the grid emerged through a series of contingent events, crises, and policy responses rather than a clean master plan. Parallels to modern infrastructure debates (Priority: 4/5): The discussion links historical load-building to modern data centers, cloud computing, distributed generation, and questions about where monopoly still makes sense.

Key Arguments: Infrastructure stories are harder to narrate than company stories because they lack a single central character, so the storytellers have to build one from institutions, places, and turning points. Samuel Insull’s crucial insight was that utilities should maximize utilization of fixed capital; more kilowatt-hours spread fixed costs and lower unit prices. Lowering prices was strategic, not charitable: by making electricity cheaper, Insull expanded the customer base and increased total profits. Insull’s customer diversification strategy—streetcars, refrigeration, elevators, and industrial loads—raised utilization from about 5% to 50%. The public utility model emerged from a pragmatic bargain: exclusivity and regulation in exchange for reliability, investment, and universal service. The historical grid is not the product of pure planning; it is a patchwork of accidents, technological shifts, and policy choices with major unintended consequences. Modern debates over data centers, cloud infrastructure, and distributed power echo the same logic of soaking up spare capacity to reduce costs for everyone. Some aspects of the grid remain natural monopoly territory, especially shared transmission, while other layers may be more contestable or decentralized.

Data Points: Runtime of Step Change coal episode: 6.5 hours - Referenced as the earlier two-part episode on coal Duration of Acquired's Microsoft episode: 4 hours 20 minutes - Used as an example of the deep-dive podcast format Insull arrives in the U.S.: 1881 - He arrives from the UK at age 21 Chicago Edison customers when Insull takes over: 5,000 - The utility he joins had a relatively small customer base Power plant utilization before Insull's load-building strategy: 5.5% - Plant was operating at very low capacity with early electric demand Power plant utilization after Insull’s strategy: 50% - After diversifying customers and loads across the day Electricity price reduction under Insull: about 90% in 12 years - He cut retail prices as usage and efficiency grew States adopting utility commissions within 10 years: 41 - Following Wisconsin and New York’s early adoption in 1907 U.S. households with electricity by end of the 1920s: 70% - Illustrates rapid electrification in that decade Number of companies on Insull’s board: 65 - Shows the extent of his holding-company empire before collapse Demonstration turbine size: 7.5 kilowatts - Early Parsons turbine demo units Chicago plant size backed by GE: 5 megawatts - Insull convinced GE to build a much larger steam-turbine plant

Pivotal Quotes: "the largest machine ever built" — David Roberts: Referring to the grid at the start of the episode "We've got the plant. The more we run it, the cheaper the power is going to be for customers" — David Roberts quoting the Insull insight: Explaining the economics of high utilization and fixed costs "it should be less like champagne and more like water" — David Roberts: Describing Insull’s view that electricity should be treated as a public good rather than a luxury

Implications: The episode suggests modern power debates still hinge on Insull’s core lesson: use shared infrastructure to cut costs, but rethink where monopoly ends as distributed generation, data centers, and batteries reshape the system.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Volts

View all episodes from Volts