Intelligence Squared
Intelligence Squared

The 12 Books of Christmas | Adam Grant on The Science of Achieving Greatness

To celebrate 2024, we’re taking a look backwards, and diving into the standout thinkers who have taken to the Intelligence Squared stage in the past 12 months. You might still be on the hunt for that perfect gift for the avid reader in your life, or perhaps you’re after some food for thought over th

Featured Speakers

Adam Grant Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Adam Grant and Tim Harford discuss Hidden Potential, arguing that success comes less from innate talent and more from character skills, deliberate practice, discomfort, play, and the right coaching structures. They explore how teaching, feedback framed as advice, and learning environments can unlock growth at any age, while also addressing scientific rigor and replication concerns in psychology.

Main Topics: Character skills as the engine of success (Priority: 5/5): Grant argues that discipline, determination, pro-social behavior, and proactive learning matter more than raw IQ or early advantage. The Raging Rooks chess story shows how coaching can cultivate these traits under pressure. Teaching and the tutor effect (Priority: 5/5): Grant explains that teaching others strengthens memory and understanding, illustrated by his students and by birth-order research suggesting firstborns gain cognitive benefits from teaching younger siblings. Advice over feedback (Priority: 5/5): He distinguishes backward-looking feedback from forward-looking advice, arguing that asking for advice yields more constructive, growth-oriented responses and reduces the critic/cheerleader trap. Deliberate play, discomfort, and learning (Priority: 4/5): The conversation contrasts productive discomfort with burnout and boredom, and explores how play, experimentation, interleaving, and embracing mistakes can accelerate skill development. Scientific rigor and the replication crisis (Priority: 4/5): Grant and Harford discuss weak replication in psychology and other fields, emphasizing better methods, larger samples, data infrastructure, and the need to judge findings probabilistically rather than dismissing them outright. Writing, revision, and collaborative standards (Priority: 3/5): Grant reflects on becoming a better writer through early setbacks, the curse of knowledge, and Cheryl Sandberg’s unusually high revision standards, which improved his clarity and rigor. Language learning and seeking discomfort (Priority: 4/5): Polyglots like Benny Lewis and Sarah Maria Hasbun show that rapid learning often comes from actively speaking, making many mistakes, and tolerating embarrassment rather than waiting for perfection.

Key Arguments: Experienced early educators and coaches can shape long-term outcomes by teaching character skills, not just content knowledge. Teaching others is one of the strongest ways to consolidate learning because it forces retrieval, explanation, and organization of knowledge. Asking for advice instead of feedback prompts people to offer actionable, forward-looking suggestions rather than judgments about past performance. Self-disclosure and admitting weaknesses can make others more willing to give honest advice and help the speaker improve. Good learning often requires tolerating short-term discomfort, especially social discomfort and the fear of looking foolish. Not all discomfort is useful; chronic exhaustion and monotony should be avoided, while manageable challenge and novelty should be embraced. Interleaving different skills can deepen learning more effectively than repeating one skill in isolation. Psychology should be evaluated with more rigor, but surprising findings should not be rejected simply because they are counterintuitive. Improved scientific infrastructure, transparency, and larger datasets could significantly accelerate progress across fields. Collaborative work with high-standard editors or coauthors can materially improve the quality of writing and thinking.

Data Points: Years of experience: 20 years - Grant says experienced kindergarten teachers with about two decades of experience produced better long-term outcomes for children. Class average increase: 3% - After Grant’s students were allowed to nominate a classmate to answer harder exam questions, the class average rose by about three percentage points. Age gap example: 12 years old - Grant jokingly told Air Force generals that he looked like he was 12 when teaching them as a young professor. Advice rating scale: 0 to 10 - Grant uses a 0–10 score before asking for advice to gauge how large a change is needed. Revision count: 100 revisions - Grant says Cheryl Sandberg would not finalize a chapter until it had undergone at least 100 revisions. Replication sample: over 200 papers - Harvard psychologist Brian Nosek’s replication project is cited as having tested more than 200 psychology papers. Psychology replication rate: about half - Grant cites the finding that roughly half of the replicated psychology studies reproduced the original result. Cancer biology failed replications: over 40% - He notes that even cancer biology replication attempts failed at a rate over 40%. Language learning target: 3 months - Polyglot Benny Lewis set a goal of becoming proficient in a language within three months. Daily mistakes goal: 200 mistakes a day - Lewis intentionally aimed to make about 200 mistakes per day to accelerate language learning.

Pivotal Quotes: "What I'm going to do is I'm gonna teach you that mastering the game of chess is all about honing your character skills." — Adam Grant: Explaining Maurice Ashley’s coaching philosophy for the Raging Rooks chess team "I think we should stop having feedback conversations and start having advice conversations." — Adam Grant: Discussing how to get useful, actionable input from others "The better you get at embracing that kind of discomfort, the faster you learn." — Adam Grant: Describing why polyglots improve by making mistakes and tolerating embarrassment

Implications: Listeners are urged to seek growth through teaching, advice, discomfort, and playful experimentation, not just talent or confidence. For organizations, better coaching, better feedback systems, and better research infrastructure could unlock much greater performance and more trustworthy science.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Intelligence Squared

View all episodes from Intelligence Squared