Episode Summary
Executive Summary: Ezra Klein and communication scholar Yanna Krotkov unpack the “other divide” in American politics: not left vs. right, but highly involved vs. politically disengaged citizens. They argue that disengaged voters still vote, care mainly about prices and bread-and-butter issues, and are increasingly breaking toward Trump in today’s fragmented media environment—making persuasion harder for Democrats focused on democracy and elite political messaging.
Main Topics: The involvement divide in politics: The conversation centers on how political engagement itself—more than ideology—shapes attention, media habits, and voting behavior. Deeply involved people are a minority, while many voters are only intermittently engaged. Why people dislike political talk: Krotkov explains that many people are turned off less by ideology itself than by constant political expression and argument, which can drive avoidance and social distance. Disengaged voters and electoral behavior: The guests discuss how politically less involved people still vote and may be crucial in 2024, with polling suggesting they lean more toward Trump than Biden. Media fragmentation and political sorting: A fragmented media system allows both hyper-consumption and deep avoidance of politics, creating very different pictures of the world and different pathways into political preferences. Issue priorities: democracy vs. affordability: Less involved voters tend to care more about economic pain, especially inflation and cost of living, while deeply involved Democrats are more focused on democracy threats and January 6. Cynicism, alternative media, and trust: The episode explores how alternative media, influencers, and parasocial relationships can spread political attitudes indirectly while reinforcing distrust of institutions and mainstream journalism. Limits of persuasion and turnout strategies: The discussion closes with the challenge Democrats face: it may be easier to address voters’ existing economic concerns than to persuade them to prioritize abstract democratic threats.
Key Arguments: Political involvement is a continuum, not a binary; only about 20% of Americans are deeply involved in politics. People often dislike political expression more than political identity itself; constant political talk can intensify avoidance. Less involved voters do vote, and they are especially important in close elections. Polling suggests disengaged voters are leaning toward Trump more than highly engaged voters, particularly through media-source breakdowns. The rise of fragmented media has created both hyper-news consumers and genuine news avoiders, widening the engagement gap. Less involved voters prioritize affordability and inflation over democracy-focused messaging. Trump’s conviction did not produce a major polling shift because many voters either already believed the underlying claims or are steeped in political cynicism. Alternative media and influencers can transmit politics ambiently, often in anti-institutional or anti-elite terms, without viewers realizing they are consuming politics. Higher income predicts greater political involvement, likely because time and resources make it easier to follow politics closely. Democrats may need to meet disengaged voters where they are on concrete economic concerns rather than assume abstract arguments will break through.
Data Points: Deeply politically involved Americans: about 20% - Krotkov says deeply involved people are a minority across surveys. Disengaged voters in NBC poll: 15% of voters - Ezra cites an NBC poll saying 15% of voters don’t follow political news. Trump margin among disengaged voters: 26 points - Ezra notes Trump was winning non-news-following voters by this margin. 2016 turnout among politically uninvolved voters: about 65% - Ezra says many non-followers still voted in the 2016 presidential election. Trump conviction: 34 felony counts - Used throughout the discussion on whether the verdict moved voters. Trump-to-Biden switch after conviction: 15% - Times/Siena data cited: among former Trump supporters who switched to Biden after the verdict, 15% pay attention to politics some of the time or never. Social media news users: Joe Biden leads RFK Jr. by 2 points - Ezra cites polling showing Biden only narrowly ahead among those mostly getting news from social media. Summer 2022 survey timing: January 6 hearings period - Krotkov references a survey fielded during the televised hearings.
Pivotal Quotes: "Interested and uninterested. The people who follow politics closely and the people who avoid it as much as they can." — Ezra Klein: He frames the episode’s core premise: the biggest divide in politics may be attention, not ideology. "People don't like talking about politics. People don't like others who talk about politics." — Yanna Krotkov: Krotkov summarizes one of the book’s central findings about social aversion to political expression. "It is hard to convince somebody that they shouldn't be concerned about their own economic issues." — Yanna Krotkov: She explains why affordability messaging may matter more than abstract democratic appeals for disengaged voters.
Implications: Campaigns and media outlets should not assume more political messaging is always better. Reaching disengaged voters likely requires concrete, lived-experience-based economic appeals and awareness that alternative media now shapes politics ambiently.
About The Ezra Klein Show
Ezra Klein invites you into a conversation on something that matters. How do we address climate change if the political system fails to act? Has the logic of markets infiltrated too many aspects of our lives? What is the future of the Republican Party? What do psychedelics teach us about consciousness? What does sci-fi understand about our present that we miss? Can our food system be just to humans and animals alike? Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from po...