Throughline
Throughline

The Creeping Coup

On the surface, the story of Sudan’s war is about two generals vying for power. But it’s also about a vast web of international interests involving the U.S., China, Russia, and the UAE. Today on the show, the story of how things in Sudan got to this point, and the effects of the conflict around the

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode traces Sudan’s current war back through colonial control, religious politics, oil, gold, and military patronage. It argues that today’s conflict between Burhan and Hemeti is the latest chapter in a long cycle of coups and state violence, with civilians suffering most and international powers fueling the struggle for the Red Sea, oil routes, and mineral wealth.

Main Topics: Current war and humanitarian catastrophe (Priority: 5/5): The transcript opens with the 2023 Sudan war, emphasizing mass displacement, famine, and atrocities, and framing the conflict as a global crisis rather than a purely domestic power struggle. Colonial legacy and the strategic importance of the Nile/Red Sea (Priority: 5/5): It explains how British imperial interests in the Nile and Suez shaped Sudan’s political geography and entrenched north-focused rule that still influences conflict today. Bashir’s rise, Islamism, and the military state (Priority: 5/5): Omar al-Bashir’s 1989 coup, his alliance with Islamist ideologues, and his use of repression and sanctions isolate Sudan while deepening authoritarian rule. Oil boom, Darfur war, and the creation of the RSF (Priority: 5/5): Oil revenues enabled Bashir to fund security forces, crush dissent in Darfur, and elevate Hemeti and the Janjaweed into the Rapid Support Forces. Fall of Bashir and failure of the transition (Priority: 5/5): The 2018-2019 protests ousted Bashir, but Burhan and Hemeti preserved military power, crushed demonstrators in the Khartoum massacre, and later staged another coup. Foreign powers and resource competition (Priority: 4/5): The episode highlights how the UAE, Russia/Wagner, Saudi interests, China, and the US all intersect with Sudan through gold, weapons, agriculture, sanctions, and Red Sea access.

Key Arguments: Sudan’s war is not sudden; it is the product of more than a century of colonial strategy, exclusion, coups, and militarized governance. The north-south divide was intensified by colonial investment in the north and long-term political exclusion of southern and peripheral regions. Bashir survived for decades by coupling ideology with patronage, first through Islamism and later through oil-funded security expansion. Darfur’s violence was not incidental; it was a state strategy tied to resource control, militia outsourcing, and political survival. The RSF grew out of the Janjaweed and became an independent armed power center because Bashir needed a coup-proof force outside the regular army. The 2019 revolution showed strong civilian resistance, but the transition failed because the military never fully accepted civilian rule. Burhan and Hemeti’s 2023 war is partly about personal power, but also about who controls Sudan’s land, gold, and access to the Red Sea. Foreign actors are not peripheral: external weapons, gold trading, and strategic access help sustain the war and deepen civilian suffering.

Data Points: People fled Sudan since war began: over 4 million - Describes the scale of displacement after fighting broke out in April 2023 Internal displacement crisis: over 11 million - Sudan is described as the world’s largest internal displacement crisis Estimated deaths in current war: at least 40,000 - WHO estimate cited for fatalities since the 2023 conflict began Global trade through Suez-linked route: nearly 15% of world trade - Explains why Red Sea stability matters globally Global container shipping through route: 30% - Shipping share that passes through the Suez/Red Sea corridor Oil revenue share in Sudan's budget: 70% to 80% - State revenues directed to security sector during oil boom era South Sudan’s oil share: 75% - Most oil was located in the south before secession Darfur genocide deaths: about 300,000 - Estimated deaths in the Darfur crackdown under Bashir U.S. sanctions on Sudan: 1993 onward - Sanctions followed Sudan’s support for terrorism and hosting of Osama bin Laden Coup frequency: about every 5 years - Illustrates the cyclical nature of Sudan’s political instability Bread price increase that sparked protests: from 1 Sudanese pound to 3 - Trigger for the 2018 anti-Bashir protests Khartoum massacre deaths: more than 100 - RSF attack on civilian protesters in June 2019 Ukraine-related sanctions on Russia: more than 16,000 - Used to explain Russia’s gold strategy and interest in Sudanese gold Period of South Sudan civil war end to independence: 2005 to 2011 - Peace deal led to referendum and secession Time Bashir ruled: nearly 30 years - His long authoritarian tenure ended in 2019

Pivotal Quotes: "The last thing I saw of Sudan was the sea." — Khuloud: Describing her family’s escape from Sudan as the war closed airports and land routes "The Nile is the great melody that recurs throughout the whole opera." — Quoted historical framing in the episode: Used to show how the river shaped Sudan’s strategic and political importance "It is a war against civilians." — Khuloud Roulut Khair: Summing up the core human cost of the 2023 conflict

Implications: Sudan’s conflict is a warning about what happens when militaries, resources, and foreign powers converge. Without sustained civilian protection and international pressure, the war may intensify, deepen famine, and redraw regional power dynamics.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Throughline

View all episodes from Throughline