Intelligence Squared
Intelligence Squared

The Elders, with Jimmy Carter, Mary Robinson and Desmond Tutu: Part 2

The second part of our conversation from 2012 with The Elders, a coalition of world leaders and figureheads freed from the constraints of office whose wealth of experience can open doors at the highest level. In this episode, our panel made up of former US president Jimmy Carter, Mary Robinson – the

Featured Speakers

Desmond Tutu GuestJimmy Carter Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: A wide-ranging Intelligence Squared discussion with Jimmy Carter, Mary Robinson, and Desmond Tutu centers on peace, human rights, and civic responsibility. They condemn drone warfare and depersonalized conflict, defend reproductive rights as integral to sustainable development, criticize backsliding on women’s rights and human rights, and argue that democracy must be judged by its quality, not just its elections. The panel ends by urging individuals, especially young people, to believe they can make a difference.

Main Topics: Drone warfare and the ethics of remote killing (Priority: 5/5): Carter, Tutu, and Robinson argue that drones and remote bombing depersonalize war, lower the moral cost of killing, and increase civilian harm, including children and women. Reproductive rights as part of sustainable development (Priority: 5/5): Robinson explains that removing 'rights' from Rio’s reproductive-health language was a damaging political backslide that undermines women’s health and broader sustainability goals. Human rights, privacy, and the digital age (Priority: 4/5): The panel links internet/privacy concerns to the wider human-rights agenda and stresses that new technologies should serve human needs rather than violence or surveillance. Democracy: legitimacy, quality, and corruption (Priority: 5/5): Carter defends electoral legitimacy but argues democracy is weakened when money dominates politics, especially in the U.S.; the discussion also touches on Egypt and Indonesia. Arts, culture, and conflict resolution (Priority: 3/5): Tutu highlights the role of arts, song, and symbolic acts like boycotts in challenging oppression and fostering reconciliation, drawing on apartheid and other struggles. LGBTQ rights and justice (Priority: 4/5): Tutu forcefully defends gay rights, equating homophobia with other forms of unjust persecution and criticizing religious institutions for focusing on sexuality amid poverty and conflict. Individual agency and civic responsibility (Priority: 5/5): The session closes with a call for ordinary people, especially the young, to act as active citizens and believe they can influence peace, human rights, and governance.

Key Arguments: Remote warfare is morally worse because it removes shared risk and reduces victims to people who are easier to kill from a distance. Civilian casualties from drones and cluster bombs are not acceptable collateral damage; technology should be used for healing, food, clean water, and cancer treatment instead. Reproductive health and rights must be framed as mainstream development priorities; without the word 'rights,' policy language loses hard-won protections. Population control is the wrong framing; the real solutions are educating girls and women, strengthening health systems, and reducing maternal and child deaths. Democracy should be recognized when it is legitimately chosen by the people, but its quality can and should be criticized when money or coercion distorts it. The U.S. campaign-finance system has been corrupted by unlimited corporate spending, producing negative advertising and polarization. Arts, music, and cultural boycotts can play a meaningful role in resistance and conflict resolution, as seen in the anti-apartheid struggle. LGBTQ rights are a matter of justice because people should not be persecuted for something they cannot choose, such as their sexual orientation. The elderly and powerful should not monopolize change; citizens and young people are central to shaping the future. Human rights advocacy must remain anchored in peace, justice, and universal values even when political institutions fall short.

Data Points: Year of Rio sustainable development conference discussed: 2012 - Mary Robinson references the Rio conference and its language on reproductive health and rights. Year of Cairo conference referenced: 1994 - Robinson says Rio backslid from the Cairo conference on population and development. Year of Beijing conference referenced: 1995 - Robinson links the removal of rights language to backsliding from the Beijing World Conference on Women. Universal Declaration anniversary campaign: 60th anniversary - Robinson says the Elders marked the 60th anniversary with a year of activities. Treaty duration: almost 35 years - Carter says the Israel-Egypt peace treaty he helped broker has lasted nearly 35 years. Time since Carter used force as president: 50 years - The host notes Carter was the only American president in the last fifty years not to have fired a shot in anger during his presidency. Aerial bombing altitude mentioned: 30,000 feet - Carter contrasts remote bombing from 30,000 feet with on-the-ground combat. Corporate campaign spending decision: unlimited amounts of money - Carter criticizes a U.S. Supreme Court ruling allowing corporations to donate unlimited amounts to elections. Timeline for arms trade treaty hoped for: end of July / end of the month - Robinson says advocates hoped for an arms trade treaty by the end of the month. Two democratic elections in Indonesia: first in almost 50 years; then a second five years later - Carter cites Indonesia as an example of a stable democracy developing through fair elections.

Pivotal Quotes: "It's all war." — Desmond Tutu: Tutu answers whether there is a moral difference between battlefield killing and remote drone strikes. "I think that it's a very serious step that we have taken from massive aerial bombing all the way through to the drone attack." — Jimmy Carter: Carter explains how technological distance removes deterrence and dehumanizes victims. "I can make a difference." — Jon Snow / closing host framing: The discussion ends with a call for individual agency and civic action.

Implications: The episode argues that technology, money, and political rhetoric must not erode human dignity. For listeners, it’s a reminder that peace, rights, and democracy depend on active citizenship, not passive trust in leaders or institutions.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Intelligence Squared

View all episodes from Intelligence Squared