Tech Wont Save Us
Tech Wont Save Us

The Forgotten Story of How Conservatives Shaped the Internet w/ Becca Lewis

Paris Marx is joined by Becca Lewis to discuss the right-wing project to shape the internet in the 1990s and how we’re still living with the legacies of those actions today.Becca Lewis is a postdoctoral researcher at Stanford University.Tech Won’t Save Us offers a critical perspective on tech, its w

Featured Speakers

Paris Marx HostBecca Lewis Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode examines how 1980s-90s right-wing and Christian conservative networks shaped the internet’s development, framing digital technology as a tool to restore traditional hierarchies rather than expand progress. Becca Lewis traces how figures like George Gilder and Newt Gingrich helped drive deregulation, media reorganization, and tech ideology that still echoes in today’s billionaire-led, increasingly reactionary tech politics.

Main Topics: Reactionary futurism vs. the 'Californian ideology' (Priority: 5/5): Lewis distinguishes her concept of 'reactionary futurism' from the better-known countercultural libertarianism associated with Silicon Valley, arguing that some right-wing actors embraced digital tech to restore older social orders. George Gilder as a central ideological broker (Priority: 5/5): Gilder’s evolution from anti-feminist provocateur to supply-side economist to tech evangelist made him a key figure linking conservative politics, entrepreneurship, and Silicon Valley techno-optimism. Christian conservatism and masculinity in tech ideology (Priority: 5/5): The discussion shows how Gilder and allies infused computing with Christian symbolism and used entrepreneurship to restore male breadwinner norms, nuclear family ideals, and anti-feminist social order. Right-wing media ecosystems and agenda-setting (Priority: 4/5): Forbes ASAP, Upside, think tanks, and emerging conservative media helped popularize techno-optimist and anti-mainstream narratives, creating alternative channels to attack media, schools, and expertise. Policy battles over the Telecommunications Act (Priority: 5/5): Lewis explains how conservative and libertarian coalitions helped dismantle public-interest provisions, enabling deregulation, media consolidation, and the legal architecture of the modern internet, including Section 230. Legacy in today’s tech and political landscape (Priority: 5/5): The episode connects 1990s ideas to contemporary trends: billionaire ownership of platforms, right-wing tech politics, attacks on institutions, and the weakening of public-interest digital governance.

Key Arguments: The internet’s political history is not neutral or progressive; it was actively shaped by reactionary actors who saw digital technologies as a way to rebuild traditional social hierarchies. George Gilder’s tech enthusiasm was ideologically consistent with his anti-feminist and pro-market politics, not a detached shift between unrelated worlds. Christian rhetoric was embedded in early Silicon Valley ideology, with technologies framed as quasi-spiritual gifts and entrepreneurs as godlike figures. Right-wing media institutions helped normalize techno-utopian and anti-regulatory views, giving these ideas reach beyond academic or elite policy circles. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 was a decisive deregulatory turn that facilitated media concentration and removed public-interest commitments from internet policy. Claims that algorithm tweaks alone can fix polarization or disinformation miss the deeper historical reality: highly ideological groups intentionally used the internet to pursue reactionary goals. The EFF/libertarian push for minimal government overlap with right-wing anti-statism, creating a coalition that advanced deregulation despite divergent end goals. Today’s billionaire-run platforms and attacks on schools/media are extensions of these older political projects, not new disruptions.

Data Points: Episode number: 251 - The host notes the show has just passed its 250th episode and is now at episode 251. DD dissertation timing: Just finished - Becca Lewis says she has just completed her PhD dissertation and is now a postdoctoral research fellow at Stanford. Forbes ASAP circulation: 800,000 subscribers - The episode says Forbes ASAP was distributed to roughly 800,000 Forbes subscribers. Telecommunications Act: 1996 - A major policy pivot discussed as reshaping communications law and internet regulation. Congressional control shift: 1994 - Gingrich became Speaker after Republicans gained control of the House, enabling rewrites to telecom legislation. Mainframe-to-personal computing shift: Microchip enabled miniaturization - Gilder framed the microchip as the breakthrough that reduced mainframes into personal computers. Public lane proposal: 20% - Lewis cites an early draft that reserved 20% of the internet for public discourse/non-commercial use.

Pivotal Quotes: "We do tend to assume that technology is inherently progressive." — Paris Marks: Opening framing of the episode’s core critique of tech ideology. "I have ended up calling reactionary futurism" — Becca Lewis: Lewis defines the concept used to describe conservative actors who embraced digital tech to restore older hierarchies. "the microchip was the cathedral of the modern era" — Becca Lewis (describing George Gilder's view): Illustrates how Gilder infused technology with Christian meaning and spiritual grandeur.

Implications: Listeners should view tech platforms and internet policy as historically political, not neutral. The episode suggests today’s platform crises stem from deliberate ideological projects, so solutions must go beyond technical fixes and confront power, ownership, and deregulation.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Tech Wont Save Us

Silicon Valley wants to shape our future, but why should we let it? Every Thursday, Paris Marx is joined by a new guest to critically examine the tech industry, its big promises, and the people behind them. Tech Won’t Save Us challenges the notion that tech alone can drive our world forward by showing that separating tech from politics has consequences for us all, especially the most vulnerable. It’s not your usual tech podcast.

View all episodes from Tech Wont Save Us