Masters in Business
Masters in Business

The New Deregulatory SEC

Big changes are afoot at the Securities and Exchange Commission. More IPOs, more crypto, and less enforcement are coming as the SEC becomes smaller and much more corporate-friendly. What might this mean for investors? Michelle Leder is a researcher covering corporate SEC filings; she founded the res

Featured Speakers

Bloomberg HostMichelle Leader Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The conversation examines a more deregulatory SEC under Chairman Paul Atkins, with weaker enforcement, staff reductions, crypto-friendly policy, and renewed pressure to loosen disclosures such as quarterly reporting. Guest Michelle Leader argues some trimming is reasonable, but sweeping rollbacks could harm investors by reducing transparency around earnings, climate risk, cyber incidents, and executive pay.

Main Topics: SEC deregulation and weaker enforcement (Priority: 5/5): Michelle Leader says the SEC’s basic legal framework is unchanged, but enforcement activity has slowed amid staffing losses and a more corporate-friendly agenda. Paul Atkins and crypto-friendly policy (Priority: 5/5): Atkins is described as a crypto booster whose leadership has shifted the SEC toward a laissez-faire approach, with crypto dominating regulatory attention. Quarterly reporting and disclosure reform (Priority: 5/5): The discussion weighs whether companies should report less frequently; Leader argues that moving to semiannual reporting would hurt investors and reduce timely visibility. Executive compensation and outsized equity awards (Priority: 4/5): The hosts discuss Elon Musk’s trillion-dollar package and broader trends toward larger stock grants, with Leader warning that Tesla may be creating a template for excess. Clawbacks and shareholder litigation (Priority: 3/5): Leader explains that clawbacks are more commonly pursued through plaintiff litigation than SEC action, and are relatively rare in practice. Crypto, climate, and cybersecurity disclosure (Priority: 5/5): The segment contrasts the SEC’s relaxed stance on crypto with its retreat from climate rules and continued, uneven cybersecurity disclosure requirements.

Key Arguments: The SEC’s rules have not fundamentally changed, but reduced enforcement and staffing have weakened oversight. A broad anti-regulation approach is too blunt; reforms should be targeted rather than using a 'chainsaw.' Quarterly earnings reporting may be burdensome, but eliminating it or moving to six-month reporting would disadvantage ordinary investors. Tesla’s compensation vote may be encouraging other companies to approve large equity packages for executives. Clawbacks exist in many companies’ policies, but actual recoupment of compensation is uncommon. The current SEC is far more permissive on crypto than the previous leadership, increasing risks for less sophisticated investors. Cybersecurity incidents must be disclosed in a specific 8-K section, but companies often do so inconsistently and the true cost is often unclear at first. Climate disclosures can be burdensome, but some climate-related risk disclosure remains important for investors.

Data Points: SEC staff reduction: about 20% - Leader says the SEC has lost roughly one-fifth of its staff since Jan. 20 under the current administration. SEC commissioners: 4 - Leader notes the SEC is operating with only four commissioners instead of the usual five. SEC commissioners by party structure: 3 majority / 2 minority - She explains the typical composition of SEC commissioners by party. Elon Musk compensation package: trillion-dollar package - Referenced as the extreme example of executive compensation at Tesla. New Minfo stock award: nearly 10 million shares - Leader cites the company’s award to its founder/CEO as an example of outsized compensation. Year cybersecurity rules tightened: 2022 - Leader says the SEC added more specific cyber disclosure rules in 2022 under Gary Gensler. Potential cyber incident remediation cost: $5,000 to $500 million - Used to illustrate how uncertain initial disclosure of a cyber incident can be. Quarterly reporting interval: 3 months - The discussion contrasts current quarterly reporting with a proposed six-month schedule. Proposed semiannual reporting interval: 6 months - Leader argues this would be bad for investors overall. Investor earnings example: 25 cents vs. 20 cents per share - Used to describe a typical litigation trigger in shareholder suits.

Pivotal Quotes: "It's the enforcement that is, you know, a bit up in the air." — Michelle Leader: Describing how SEC regulation has become weaker even though the formal rules remain in place. "I think this wholesale approach to like all regulation is bad and it's costing people money is a little bit of an overkill." — Michelle Leader: Her critique of broad deregulatory rhetoric at the SEC and in Washington. "Going to every six months would be really, you know, bad for investors overall." — Michelle Leader: Her view on proposals to reduce the frequency of earnings reporting.

Implications: Investors should expect less regulatory scrutiny, more crypto accommodation, and potentially weaker disclosure standards. That could mean less transparency and more risk, especially for retail investors, even if some compliance burdens are eased.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Masters in Business

Barry Ritholtz speaks with the people that shape markets, investing and business.

View all episodes from Masters in Business