The Pragmatic Engineer
The Pragmatic Engineer

The state of VC within software and AI startups – with Peter Walker

Brought to You By: •⁠ WorkOS — The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. •⁠ Statsig ⁠ — ⁠ The unified platform for flags, analytics, experiments, and more. • Sonar — Code quality and code security for ALL code. — In this episode of The Pragmatic Engineer, I sit down with Peter Walker, Head of Insig

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode examines how venture capital has shifted from growth-at-all-costs to capital efficiency, with fewer startups raising rounds, longer fundraising cycles, smaller teams, and more scrutiny on revenue per employee. AI is amplifying these trends by boosting productivity, reducing hiring, and enabling solo founders, though VCs still favor teams. For engineers, the takeaway is to evaluate startup risk, burn, and growth like an investor.

Main Topics: Venture capital health is strong by dollars, weaker by deal count: Peter argues VC looks healthy if measured by total capital invested, but less healthy when measured by the number of startups getting funded. A small number of AI giants absorb huge checks while early-stage fundraising activity declines. AI is changing startup hiring and team size: The clearest trend in Carta data is that startups are hiring far fewer people and operating with smaller teams. AI tools are increasing individual productivity and shifting the labor model toward leaner orgs and potentially more solo founders. Higher bar for funding and capital efficiency: Investors now demand much stronger growth and metrics such as ARR per FTE. Startup valuation and growth expectations rose sharply, especially for AI companies, while non-AI startups face a tougher market. Fundraising cycles are longer and bridge/down rounds are risk signals: Time between rounds has increased, bridge rounds have worse graduation odds, and down rounds often signal trouble. Employees should treat these as warnings and understand the company’s runway and fundraising position. Solo founders are rising but VCs still prefer teams: Solo-founded startups have become much more common, especially with AI lowering startup creation costs, but VC-backed solo founders remain a minority because investors worry about execution, key-person risk, and inability to attract talent. How engineers should evaluate VC-backed startups: Listeners are advised to think like investors: assess growth, moat, burn, valuation, fundraising history, and whether the company is still a venture-scale business. Transparency and founder quality matter greatly for career outcomes. Advisors, option pools, and dilution mechanics: The episode explains advisor equity norms, employee option pools, and dilution/liquidation preferences. It emphasizes that headline valuations can mislead employees about actual payout potential.

Key Arguments: VC is fundamentally about funding unusually fast growth; companies growing only modestly are often not good venture candidates. The recent decline in hiring is driven first by weaker funding, then increasingly by AI-driven productivity gains that reduce headcount needs. AI has already begun taking jobs in startups by enabling smaller teams to do more work. Series A companies today are expected to show much stronger revenue and efficiency metrics than in prior years. Startup fundraising is taking longer because VCs are doing deeper diligence and are more selective. Bridge rounds and down rounds are practical red flags for employees and founders, even if the company remains alive. Solo-founded startups are becoming more common because building a company is cheaper and easier, but VCs still prefer co-founding teams. For startup employees, equity is risky and usually far less valuable than the headline percentage suggests because of dilution and liquidation preferences. The best startup careers are not necessarily compensation-maximizing; they are often learning- and responsibility-maximizing. Founders who communicate runway, growth, and fundraising realities transparently are better signals than secretive teams.

Data Points: Startups hiring on Carta (Jan 2022): 73,000 hires - Monthly startup hiring at the start of 2022 Startups hiring on Carta (Jan 2023): 40,000 hires - Monthly startup hiring after the 2022 downturn Startups hiring on Carta (Jan 2024): 32,000 hires - Continued decline in monthly hiring Projected startup hiring on Carta (Jan 2025): ~20,000 hires - Estimated further drop in startup hiring Early-stage rounds per day on Carta in 2025: 7.4 rounds/day - Seed and Series A fundraising frequency, roughly half of 2021 Series A employee count in 2022: 20-22 full-time employees - Typical headcount on the day a company raised Series A Series A employee count now: ~15 full-time employees - Current typical headcount on Series A raise day Projected Series A employee count by end of year: 12-13 full-time employees - Expected further reduction in Series A team size Median ARR at Series A in 2021: ~$1.3 million - Silicon Valley Bank data on startup revenue at Series A Median ARR at Series A in 2024: ~$3 million - Series A startups are raising at much higher revenue levels 75th percentile ARR at Series A in 2024: ~$7 million - Upper-quartile Series A revenue has grown dramatically Median seed valuation: ~$16 million pre-money - Carta data on current seed pricing in the US Seed-to-series A graduation rate in boom times: up to ~50% - Around 2021 when capital was abundant Typical seed-to-series A graduation rate now: ~25-30% - Current expected proportion of seed companies reaching Series A Bridge round success rate in 2020: 33% - Share of price bridge rounds that ultimately reached Series A Bridge round success rate in 2021: 16% - Bridge round outcomes worsened significantly Bridge round success rate in 2022: 8% - Very low conversion from bridge to Series A Solo-founded startups share in 2024: over 1/3 - Among all startups on Carta, highest level in 10 years Solo-founded VC-backed startups share in 2024: 17% - VCs still fund solo founders at a much lower rate than their prevalence Median advisor equity: 0.25% - Across 5,000 advisors in 2024 Typical first employee equity: 1.5% - Median equity for the first hire at a tech startup Option pool size historically: 15-20% - Common size investors used to require at startup formation Option pool size now: 5-10% - Smaller initial pools are increasingly common Median time between seed and Series A / later rounds: ~2.5 years between seed and Series A; nearly 3 years between Series A and B - Fundraising cycles are lengthening

Pivotal Quotes: "I am not one of those people that says AI is not going to take jobs. I think it kind of already is." — Peter Walker: On the impact of AI on startup hiring and headcount "Venture is in the business of funding growth and not just regular growth, but expansive growth." — Peter Walker: Explaining what makes a company venture-scale versus a normal business "If you raise more money, you could use that money to grow faster. And now it's the question of: well, if we don't raise that money, can we still grow as fast as if we had raised it?" — Peter Walker: Discussing the post-2021 shift toward capital efficiency

Implications: Expect smaller startup teams, tougher fundraising, longer cycles, and more emphasis on efficiency. Engineers should vet runway, revenue, and founder transparency before joining, while founders must prove venture-scale growth or consider bootstrapping.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About The Pragmatic Engineer

View all episodes from The Pragmatic Engineer