Goldman Sachs Exchanges
Goldman Sachs Exchanges

The US-China Tech Race

Is the US or China winning the tech race, and what factors will determine the outcome? Mark Kennedy, founding director of the Wahba Initiative for Strategic Competition, and Paul Triolo, partner at DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group, discuss with Allison Nathan on the latest episode of Goldman Sachs Exc

Featured Speakers

Goldman Sachs Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: This podcast analyzes the US-China tech race, arguing it's central to their strategic rivalry. While the US leads in cutting-edge technologies like AI and semiconductors, China excels in applications, global installations, and self-sufficiency. The outcome is uncertain, hinging on factors like semiconductor supply chain choke points, energy availability, and trust. China's advantages in scale, sustained investment, and rare earths could allow it to win the 'installation' race even if the US leads in 'blueprints.'

Main Topics: The Four Arenas of the Tech Race (Priority: 5/5): Mark Kennedy breaks down the competition into four areas: leading technology, applying it, installing digital infrastructure, and achieving self-sufficiency. The US leads in the first, but China is ahead or catching up in the others. Effectiveness of US Export Controls (Priority: 5/5): Both speakers discuss how US export controls on chips have slowed but not stopped China, accelerating its push for self-sufficiency. China is developing alternative capabilities, and the long-term effectiveness remains uncertain. Semiconductor Supply Chain Choke Points (Priority: 4/5): Paul Triolo identifies key choke points: advanced lithography (ASML), etching equipment (US/Japan), and TSMC's manufacturing model. These are critical for producing the most advanced chips. China's Advantages: Scale, Investment, and Rare Earths (Priority: 4/5): China benefits from sustained, targeted investment, a large STEM workforce, and dominance in rare earths. It is also building out energy infrastructure and data centers to support AI. The Battle for Trust and Standards (Priority: 3/5): Kennedy emphasizes that trust is a key factor. China's model is controlled and less interoperable, while US actions (e.g., cutting satellite access) can undermine its reliability as a supplier. Energy as a Gating Function for AI (Priority: 4/5): Both speakers highlight energy as a major constraint, especially for the US. China's unified grid and aggressive renewable energy buildout give it an advantage in powering AI data centers. The Rise of Chinese Open-Source AI Models (Priority: 4/5): Paul Triolo notes that leading open-source AI models are now from Chinese companies like DeepSeek, enabling rapid innovation and wider deployment, challenging US dominance in proprietary models.

Key Arguments: Technology is the 'switchboard' of the US-China rivalry, impacting all domains (military, economic, influence). The US leads in semiconductors, AI frameworks, cloud, quantum computing, and talent, but China leads in quantum communications, hypersonics, batteries, and robotics application. US export controls have slowed China but accelerated its push for self-sufficiency; they are not a 'silver bullet.' China's dominance in rare earths is a serious risk, but the US has not taken deliberate steps to mitigate it. The US needs to increase research funding, attract global talent, and build scale to compete with China's deliberate efforts in the Global South. China's sustained, targeted investment in key technologies and focus on securing sources and markets gives it a strategic advantage. Trust is a critical battleground: China's controlled model reduces trust, but US actions can also undermine its reliability. The semiconductor supply chain is complex with multiple choke points: lithography (ASML), etching (US/Japan), and TSMC's manufacturing model. China is the only country that could potentially recreate large parts of the semiconductor supply chain due to its scale and government resources. Energy availability is a major constraint for US AI data center buildout, while China has a more unified grid and is investing heavily in renewables. Chinese open-source AI models are now leading in terms of uptake and innovation, challenging US proprietary models. The outcome of the AI race is uncertain; it depends on whether scaling compute continues to improve models and whether China can overcome hardware choke points.

Data Points: Robotics usage in manufacturing: 12 times as many - China uses 12 times as many robotics in manufacturing when adjusted for income scale differences, according to Mark Kennedy. Huawei's size relative to competitors: As big as its next two largest competitors combined - Mark Kennedy states Huawei is dominant in the Global South. TSMC's market share in advanced nodes: Over 90% - Paul Triolo notes TSMC produces over 90% of the most advanced semiconductor nodes. Feature size of advanced semiconductors: 2 nanometers - Paul Triolo mentions this as an example of the tiny dimensions involved in cutting-edge chips. Timeframe for US rare earths reprieve: One year - Mark Kennedy says China has given a one-year reprieve from more restrictive rare earth controls.

Pivotal Quotes: "Tech isn't just at the center. It's really the switchboard. Because whoever is going to route the data, the standards, the compute in the future is really going to impact every domain." — Mark Kennedy: Explaining the central role of technology in the US-China strategic rivalry. "You could have a situation where we're owning the blueprints, but they're owning the buildings. We're in the lead in the code, but they're in the lead in the circuits." — Mark Kennedy: Describing a possible outcome where the US leads in technology but China dominates in applications and installations. "The only country in the world that could even conceive of trying to recreate large parts of the semiconductor supply chain is China, because they do have the numbers of engineers and they do have the government resource incentive now to do this." — Paul Triolo: Discussing China's unique potential to achieve semiconductor self-sufficiency.

Implications: The US-China tech race is not a simple win/lose scenario. The US may lead in innovation, but China's scale and strategic focus could allow it to dominate global tech infrastructure and applications. This has profound geopolitical and economic consequences, requiring the US to invest in research, talent, energy, and trust-building to maintain its edge.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Goldman Sachs Exchanges

In each episode of "Exchanges," people from the firm share their insights on developments shaping industries, markets and the global economy.

View all episodes from Goldman Sachs Exchanges