In Our Time
In Our Time

Theories of Everything

Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss the 30 year search to solve all the biggest questions in physics. At the end of the last century, brave voices were predicting that all the big questions of physics were on the verge of being answered by a Theory of Everything. The disparity between the physics of the

Featured Speakers

Val Gibson GuestBrian Greene Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode debates the prospects for a "theory of everything"—a unified framework joining general relativity and quantum mechanics. Guests Brian Greene, Val Gibson, and John Barrow explain why gravity is hardest to unify, how string theory and extra dimensions might provide testable clues, and why experimental searches at CERN could reveal supersymmetry, dark matter candidates, or signs of a deeper law of nature.

Main Topics: Why quantum mechanics and general relativity conflict (Priority: 5/5): Greene explains that relativity treats space-time as smooth and geometric, while quantum theory is inherently fuzzy and uncertain, making unification difficult. The motivation for a theory of everything (Priority: 5/5): Barrow argues that physics seeks one underlying set of laws, not four separate "legislations," and that unification could explain the universe’s deepest structure. Big Bang and Planck-scale physics (Priority: 5/5): The discussion centers on the earliest universe, where extreme density and energy require a theory that handles both gravity and quantum effects at the Planck scale. String theory as a candidate framework (Priority: 5/5): Greene presents string theory as the leading attempt to unify gravity and quantum mechanics by replacing point particles with vibrating strings. Experimental tests at CERN and the LHC (Priority: 4/5): Gibson describes how collider experiments might reveal supersymmetry, extra dimensions, missing energy, or other signatures indirectly supporting string theory. Constants, symmetry breaking, and dark matter (Priority: 4/5): The speakers discuss how fundamental constants may be derived from deeper theory, how symmetry breaks into the low-energy world we observe, and how supersymmetric particles could explain dark matter. Philosophy, Gödel, and the future of physics (Priority: 3/5): The panel debates Hawking’s pessimism and whether Gödel’s theorem limits physics, ultimately concluding that a deep, discoverable law may still exist.

Key Arguments: Quantum mechanics and general relativity are both successful but conceptually incompatible, especially because one assumes smooth space-time while the other introduces intrinsic uncertainty. A theory of everything matters most for fundamental questions like the origin of the universe, not for everyday phenomena such as Shakespeare or human behavior. Gravity is uniquely difficult to unify because it affects everything and, in relativity, also defines the geometry of space-time itself. String theory offers a candidate unification because it can mathematically accommodate both gravity and quantum mechanics and predicts extra dimensions. Experimentalists cannot directly see strings, but they can search for indirect signatures such as missing energy, gravitons, supersymmetric particles, or deviations from known physics. If string theory could calculate measured constants like the fine structure constant or particle masses from first principles, it would strongly validate the framework. Supersymmetry could help explain dark matter, making collider searches relevant both to particle physics and cosmology. Gödel’s incompleteness theorem does not necessarily block a theory of everything, because physics may only need a decidable subset of mathematics.

Data Points: Planck length: ~10^-33 centimeters - Greene identifies the scale where quantum gravity becomes necessary. Time after the Big Bang where unification may matter: ~10^-43 seconds - Described as the epoch where gravity and quantum mechanics must be combined. Cosmic time accessible with current physics: About 0.1 second after the Big Bang - Greene says existing laws can only reliably extrapolate this far back. CERN collider size: 27 kilometers - Gibson describes the Large Hadron Collider tunnel. Proton bunch size in the LHC: Less than 0.1 millimeter - Protons are injected in tightly packed bunches. Protons per bunch: 100,000 million at a time - Gibson explains the scale of LHC collisions. Collision energy analogy: Equivalent to a 200-ton train traveling at 200 km/h - Used to illustrate the energy concentrated in LHC collisions. Number of free parameters in particle physics: About 19 or 20 - Greene cites the measured constants inserted into the Standard Model. Extra dimensions required by string theory: At least 6 and probably 7 more dimensions beyond the known ones - Barrow and Greene describe the mathematical requirements of the theory. Cosmic look-back time via quasar light: 10 billion years - Barrow discusses testing whether constants have changed over cosmic time.

Pivotal Quotes: "we would know the mind of God" — Stephen Hawking (quoted by host): Referenced as Hawking’s earlier enthusiasm for a theory of everything. "gravity acts on everything, and because of that, you can't turn it off" — Val Gibson: Explaining why gravity is especially difficult to unify with other forces. "there is a rock-bottom set of laws, a rock-bottom set of fundamental entities" — Brian Greene: Greene’s expression of confidence that a deepest layer of physical law exists.

Implications: If unification succeeds, it could reshape our understanding of space, time, and the universe’s origin, while also guiding collider physics and cosmology. Even indirect evidence could point to new dimensions, new particles, and a deeper explanation for the constants of nature.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About In Our Time

View all episodes from In Our Time