Episode Summary
Executive Summary: Eric Packman explains how Bancreek uses information theory and data visualization to build systematic, quality-focused ETFs, while arguing that U.S. labor and inflation are being distorted by extreme healthcare concentration, Medicaid-dependent employment, and immigration-driven labor supply shifts. He says these structural trends create both stability and fragility for the economy and investors.
Main Topics: Eric Packman’s career path and Bancreek’s origin: Packman describes moving from corporate finance and engineering into healthcare transparency work after his mother’s cancer battle, then into Bancreek because he wanted to apply data-driven investing and information theory to markets. Information theory as an investing framework: He explains Bancreek’s approach as a practical application of Claude Shannon and the Kelly criterion: using signal-vs-noise concepts and edge-over-odds thinking to identify stocks with long-term endurance. Employment data visualization and sector concentration: Packman walks through Bancreek’s U.S. employment treemap, arguing it reveals a labor market increasingly dominated by healthcare while most other industries plateau or decline. Healthcare as both stabilizer and risk: He argues healthcare has acted as a recession buffer and employment engine, but its growth is heavily tied to opaque pricing, rebates, and government-funded demand that may be vulnerable to policy cuts. Medicaid, elderly care, and labor-market fragility: Packman highlights elder/disability care as a fast-growing industry supported by Medicaid waivers, warning that cuts or work requirements could reduce jobs, increase institutionalization, and raise costs elsewhere. Immigration, labor supply, and structural inflation: Using household survey data, he argues immigrant labor is essential to U.S. job growth and that native-born labor supply is shrinking outside the 65+ cohort, making immigration restrictions inflationary and growth-negative. Inflation drivers and the CPI/PCE visualization tools: He says inflation is driven mostly by large-weight items like shelter, healthcare, and gasoline rather than headline-grabbing small items, and that his visual tools help investors focus on what truly moves the index.
Key Arguments: Bancreek’s investment process is built on information theory and the Kelly criterion, aiming to convert noisy market data into a ranking of businesses with the greatest long-term endurance. Healthcare has become the dominant source of private payroll growth, masking stagnation or decline in many other industries. Professional and business services—home to many white-collar jobs—are declining outside recessions for the first time in the historical series. Healthcare’s growth has been supported by hidden price discrimination, rebates, and Medicaid/Medicare funding, making it vulnerable to political and fiscal changes. Medicaid cuts, work requirements, and reduced waivers could directly eliminate jobs in elder/disability care and indirectly increase unemployment or institutional costs. Immigration has been a major source of U.S. labor growth; without foreign-born workers, the economy would be materially short of jobs today. Inflation analysis should focus on high-weight components, not the biggest percentage movers; shelter, healthcare, and gasoline are the main variables that can move the headline trend. The model is designed to reduce human bias by rebalancing monthly and replacing emotional stock-picking with a rules-based, feature-driven process. International markets can screen very differently from U.S. markets, showing that the model’s quality signals are regime- and geography-dependent.
Data Points: Private job growth concentration: 66% - Packman says healthcare and social assistance now account for 66% of all private job growth over the last two years. Healthcare and social assistance share of workforce: 17% - This sector represents 17% of the workforce despite producing the majority of recent job growth. Historical job-base comparison: 128 million native-born base vs. 23 million foreign-born base - He compares labor-force growth from 2007 onward across native-born and foreign-born populations. Native-born job growth: 11 million jobs - Growth added by the native-born population over roughly 18.5 years. Foreign-born job growth: almost 9 million jobs - Growth added by the foreign-born population over roughly 18.5 years. Potential labor shortfall without immigration: 9 million jobs - Packman argues the U.S. would be short about 9 million jobs if immigration had been shut off. Native-born population growth: 0.7% - Native-born population growth over the 18.5-year period studied was very modest. 65+ native-born growth: 63% - The 65+ group drove most native-born growth. 45–54 age cohort trend: shrinking - He says the 45–54 cohort, which has high participation, has declined. Native-born labor force participation rate: 65% to 62% - Overall native-born participation declined, but much of that is explained by aging. Native-born 16–64 labor force participation: 75.2% to 75.3% - Packman says participation for native-born workers under 65 actually rose slightly. 65+ labor force participation: 18% - He notes the 65+ cohort has low participation because it is largely retired. Projected 65+ increase by 2100: 30 million more people - He cites Census projections for the elderly native-born population. Healthcare jobs at risk in elder/disability services: over 4 million people served; almost 2 million workers - He says the waiver-supported elder/disability daycare industry is large and vulnerable to Medicaid cuts. CPI/PCE inflation drivers: Shelter, healthcare, gasoline - Packman says these are the key high-weight components that matter most for inflation.
Pivotal Quotes: "you'll see like a plateauing and actually decline in almost every single major industry except healthcare" — Eric Packman: Summarizing his employment treemap and arguing healthcare is masking weakness elsewhere. "I think it is very, very difficult for anyone to overcome their biases, to repeatedly pick stocks and then not have attachment to their ideas" — Eric Packman: Explaining why Bancreek prefers algorithmic, model-driven investing over human discretion. "there are crystal balls living in data sets right now" — Eric Packman: His central message that investors should study macro and market data directly rather than rely on narratives.
Implications: Investors should watch healthcare, immigration, and inflation weights as major macro signals. Policy shifts in Medicaid or immigration could materially affect employment, inflation, and recession risk, while Bancreek’s model shows how data-driven stock selection may reduce bias and improve resilience.
About Excess Returns
Excess Returns is dedicated to making you a better long-term investor and making complex investing topics understandable. Join Jack Forehand, Justin Carbonneau and Matt Zeigler as they sit down with some of the most interesting names in finance to discuss topics like macroeconomics, value investing, factor investing, and more.