We Study Billionaires
We Study Billionaires

TIP206: Mastermind Discussion 3Q 2018 (Business Podcast)

On today’s show, we have assembled our mastermind group for the 3rd quarter of 2018. At the start of 2018, the US Stock market experienced a 10% correction. But since that time, equities have had a strong comeback and are now considered the longest running bull market in the history of the NY Stock

Featured Speakers

Stig Brodersen Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode is a Q3 2018 mastermind-style valuation debate on Google, Facebook, Pilgrim’s Pride, and H&R Block. The hosts weigh huge growth businesses against high valuations, regulatory/privacy risk, and business quality, while Toby’s cheaper picks emphasize margin of safety and cash generation. Google and Facebook are framed as dominant ad platforms with massive optionality, while Pilgrim’s Pride and H&R Block are defended as overlooked, cash-producing, value-oriented opportunities.

Main Topics: Google as a high-quality but expensive growth compounder (Priority: 5/5): Stig pitches Google as a non-traditional value idea driven by digital advertising dominance, optionality in cloud/AI/self-driving, and a powerful moat in search and data. The group agrees the business is exceptional but debates whether current valuation requires overly optimistic growth assumptions. Facebook’s growth, valuation, and regulatory backlash (Priority: 5/5): Hari presents Facebook as an advertising-dependent platform with enormous user engagement and strong growth, but with rising margin pressure and privacy/regulation risk. The group argues that valuation is still attractive relative to growth, yet public sentiment and government scrutiny may alter the long-term economics. Data privacy and regulatory risk for big tech (Priority: 4/5): A recurring concern is that legislators may eventually force user data transparency and control, which could undermine targeted advertising economics for Google and Facebook. The speakers see the risk as real but unevenly understood by policymakers and still likely years away. Pilgrim’s Pride as a cheap cyclical value play (Priority: 4/5): Toby argues Pilgrim’s Pride is a low-multiple chicken producer with acceptable balance-sheet safety and significant upside if tariff fears and industry weakness ease. The panel acknowledges the lack of moat and cyclical nature but sees margin of safety in the current price. H&R Block as a steady cash-generating, under-the-radar business (Priority: 4/5): Preston changes his pick to H&R Block, framing it as a stable, dividend-paying tax-prep business with recurring customer behavior, modest growth, and strong free cash flow. The group sees it as cheap, though challenged by digitization and possible competition from Intuit/TurboTax. Investment style tension: growth vs. value (Priority: 5/5): The discussion repeatedly contrasts extraordinary business quality and growth with disciplined value investing frameworks. Several speakers note that ignoring growth has been costly recently, but they remain skeptical of paying too much for future optionality.

Key Arguments: Google’s revenue is still overwhelmingly ad-driven, but the company has valuable optionality in cloud, AI, hardware, and autonomous driving. Google’s moat is its search/algorithm dominance and massive user data, plus its ability to attract elite tech talent. Google and Facebook are not obviously overvalued if their historical growth rates persist, but both require very strong future growth to justify current prices. Facebook generates extraordinary engagement and margins, but depends almost entirely on advertising and faces meaningful privacy and regulation risk. Regulatory changes that give users explicit control over collected data could materially damage ad-targeting economics for major platforms. Pilgrim’s Pride is unattractive as a business moat-wise, but the market is pricing in a lot of bad news, creating a possible margin of safety. H&R Block’s value lies in recurring tax-filing behavior, stored customer history, high dividends, and stable free cash flow despite limited growth. The panel repeatedly distinguishes between great businesses and good investments, emphasizing valuation discipline even when business quality is obvious.

Data Points: Google revenue mix: ~80%-85% from digital advertising - Stig and Hari describe Google’s dependence on ads, including search and YouTube. Google other revenue: ~15% - Stig notes Google’s “other revenue” bucket and other bets such as cloud, apps, and hardware. EU fine against Google: $5 billion - Discussion of antitrust penalties and ongoing regulatory scrutiny. Google operating income (trailing 12 months): ~$30 billion - Used to contextualize the $5 billion EU fine. Digital advertising market size: ~$250 billion - Stig cites global digital ad spending as the core industry Google competes in. Digital ad growth rate: 21% last year - Stig says the digital ad market is rapidly growing. Google market share in search: ~90% - Used to support Google’s moat and dominance in search/SEO. Google historical revenue growth: ~19% annually over 10 years - Preston uses this as the base case for valuation analysis. Google valuation scenario: ~9% return if 19% growth persists for 10 years - Preston’s valuation estimate based on historic growth continuing. Google conservative valuation scenario: ~4% return if growth slows to 10% for 10 years - Preston’s more skeptical base case. Google market cap: ~$866 billion - Preston references Google’s scale when discussing valuation. Google enterprise value: ~$770 billion - Used to imply roughly $100 billion in net cash/investments. Google P/E: ~54 - Toby argues the stock looks expensive on traditional metrics. Google EV/EBIT: ~20 - Toby compares this to his preferred valuation framework. Facebook average daily usage: 41 minutes on Facebook + 25 minutes on Instagram - Hari highlights engagement across Facebook properties. Facebook user penetration: 72% of North America; 41% of Europe; 17% of Asia excluding China - Used to demonstrate platform scale and growth opportunities. Instagram users: 800 million+ (close to 1 billion) - Hari cites Instagram’s rapid growth. Facebook Q2 2018 revenue: $13 billion - Hari says revenue grew 42% year over year. Facebook revenue growth: 42% year over year - Latest-quarter growth cited during the pitch. Facebook operating margin: ~49% - Hari notes this is unusually high versus the S&P 500 median. Facebook adjusted margin if R&D/content capitalized: ~57% - Hari suggests reported margins understate profitability. Facebook revenue from ads: ~98.5% - The group emphasizes Facebook’s dependence on advertising. Facebook market cap: ~$520 billion - Toby uses this to compare scale and valuation. Facebook enterprise value: ~$480 billion - Used to note near net-cash balance sheet. Facebook P/E: ~27 - Toby says this is roughly half of Google’s multiple. Facebook top-line growth (5-year): 40%+ annually - Preston cites Facebook’s rapid historical revenue growth. Facebook EBITDA growth (5-year): 60%+ - Preston emphasizes extraordinary operating growth. Facebook EPS growth (5-year): 186% CAGR - Used to show explosive per-share earnings growth. Pilgrim’s Pride market cap: ~$4.4 billion - Toby introduces PPC as a small-cap chicken producer. Pilgrim’s Pride enterprise value: ~$6.4 billion - Indicates meaningful debt load. Pilgrim’s Pride P/E: a little over 7 - Toby’s core valuation argument. Pilgrim’s Pride Acquirer’s Multiple: a little under 7 - Shows how cheap it is on Toby’s preferred metric. Pilgrim’s Pride Piotroski score: about 4 - Indicates mediocre financial health. Pilgrim’s Pride Altman Z-score: safe - Toby says distress risk is acceptable despite debt. Pilgrim’s Pride Beneish M-score: negative 1.5 - Suggests low earnings-manipulation risk; close to the red-flag threshold. Pilgrim’s Pride ROIC: ~20% - Toby says returns on invested capital are strong. Pilgrim’s Pride share price move: $37 in December to about $17.70 - Toby points to a roughly 50% decline creating upside. H&R Block annual revenue: ~$3.1 billion - Preston describes the company as a mature tax-prep business. H&R Block annual free cash flow: ~$751 million in 2018 - Preston cites one of the company’s better cash-flow years. H&R Block current share price: ~$25-$26 - Used in Preston’s valuation model. H&R Block dividend payout ratio: ~80% - Stig notes the high distribution rate supports income investors. H&R Block market cap: ~$5.3 billion - Toby uses this in his valuation discussion. H&R Block enterprise value: about equal to market cap - Suggests limited net debt or cash balance offset. H&R Block P/E: ~9 - Toby considers this cheap for the stability of the business. H&R Block Acquirer’s Multiple: 6.9x - Toby’s preferred valuation metric. H&R Block reverse DCF fair value: ~$33 - Toby estimates fair value above the trading price. H&R Block 5-year revenue growth: ~7.8% - Cited as better than GDP and consistent for a mature business. H&R Block 5-year EBITDA growth: ~7% - Supports the thesis that the business is still growing modestly. H&R Block share count reduction: ~400 million to a little over 200 million over 20 years - Stig praises consistent buybacks.

Pivotal Quotes: "Google represents optionality in the sense that there are self-driving cars, they have their Google platform, and then they have other initiatives that are going on." — Hari Ramachandra: Used to frame Google as more than an advertising company. "I think you got a winner when people hate your platform and then they go on your platform to talk about how much they hate your platform." — Preston/host: Commentary on Facebook’s entrenched user behavior despite backlash. "I just think that it's the ultimate time trap." — Preston/host: Expressing personal dislike for Facebook while acknowledging its business strength.

Implications: The episode reinforces that mega-cap tech can be both operationally excellent and valuation-sensitive, while overlooked cyclical or boring businesses may offer better risk-adjusted returns. It also highlights rising concern that privacy regulation could reshape digital advertising economics.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About We Study Billionaires

We interview and study famous financial billionaires, including Warren Buffett, Ray Dalio, and Howard Marks, and teach you what we learn and how you can apply their investment strategies in the stock market. We Study Billionaires is the largest stock investing podcast show in the world with 180,000,000+ downloads and is hosted by Stig Brodersen, Preston Pysh, William Green, Clay Finck, and Kyle Grieve. This podcast also includes the Richer Wiser Happier series hosted by best-selling author Wi...

View all episodes from We Study Billionaires