Stuff You Missed in History Class
Stuff You Missed in History Class

To the Hon. Chester A. Arthur; Respectfully, Julia I. Sand

In 1882 and 1883, decades before women had the right to vote, Julia Sand wrote a series of letters to President Chester A. Arthur that may have influenced his presidency. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode traces Chester A. Arthur’s rise from machine politics and corruption to an unexpectedly reform-minded presidency, emphasizing how Julia Sand’s unsolicited letters challenged him to “reform” after Garfield’s assassination. It argues that Sand’s moral pressure, combined with public outrage over corruption, helped shape Arthur’s shift toward civil service reform and a less partisan presidency.

Main Topics: Chester A. Arthur’s pre-presidential career (Priority: 5/5): Arthur’s early legal work, militia service, and ascent through New York Republican machine politics established him as a beneficiary of patronage and corruption despite some principled legal cases. The spoils system and political machines (Priority: 5/5): The transcript explains how 19th-century political machines and the spoils system operated through patronage, bribery, intimidation, and loyalty networks, making corruption systemic rather than exceptional. Garfield’s assassination and Arthur’s unexpected presidency (Priority: 5/5): James Garfield’s shooting and death propelled Arthur into the presidency, creating suspicion because of Arthur’s ties to the spoils system and the assassin’s bizarre claims. Julia Sand’s letters as moral intervention (Priority: 5/5): Julia Sand, an educated but politically excluded woman, wrote direct and unusually candid letters urging Arthur to rise above his reputation and embrace reform, framing her as a truth-teller to power. Arthur’s pivot toward civil service reform (Priority: 4/5): Despite his background, Arthur eventually broke with stalwarts, vetoed and revised immigration legislation, and signed the Pendleton Civil Service Act, signaling a genuine though limited reform agenda. Historical memory and archival recovery (Priority: 3/5): The later fate of Arthur’s papers and Sand’s letters shows how easily women’s political influence can be obscured, and how archives can restore overlooked relationships and agency.

Key Arguments: Arthur’s career demonstrates how deeply embedded patronage and machine politics were in 19th-century governance. Garfield’s assassination made civil service reform politically unavoidable, even for a man who had benefited from the old system. Julia Sand’s letters likely mattered because they combined moral pressure, political insight, and personal accountability. Arthur’s presidency was not the expected continuation of corruption; he gradually moved toward reform in response to public scrutiny and perhaps Sand’s influence. Sand’s role illustrates how women, despite lacking the vote or formal office, could still participate in political discourse and influence leaders indirectly.

Data Points: Arthur’s birth date: October 5, 1829 - Birth date of Chester A. Arthur Customs collector salary: $80,000 a year - Arthur’s earnings as customs collector at the Port of New York Estimated modern equivalent: more than half a million dollars today - Approximate present-day value of Arthur’s customs collector income Phelps Dodge fine: more than $217,000 - Fraudulent fine that triggered scrutiny of Arthur and his allies Arthur’s share of Phelps Dodge fine: more than $21,000 - Amount Arthur received from the fraudulent fine Garfield was shot: July 2, 1881 - Assassination of President James Garfield Garfield survived after shooting: nearly 80 days - Time Garfield lived after being shot Arthur became president: September 20, 1881 - Date Arthur took the oath after Garfield’s death Julia Sand’s age in 1881: 31 - Sand’s age when she began writing to Arthur Pendleton Civil Service Act signed: January 16, 1883 - Nation’s first comprehensive civil service reform law Pendleton Act scope: about 10% of federal jobs - Coverage limited to certain Washington-based jobs and large customs houses/post offices Chinese Exclusion Act veto: April 4, 1882 - Arthur vetoed the first version of the bill Revised Chinese exclusion law signed: May 6, 1882 - Arthur signed the reduced-duration version into law Rivers and Harbors Act funding: $19 million - Money appropriated in the 1882 act Garfield nomination process: 36 rounds - Number of ballots it took for Garfield to win the Republican nomination Arthur’s last known letter from Sand: September 15, 1883 - Date of Sand’s final known letter to Arthur

Pivotal Quotes: "If there is a spark of true nobility in you, now is the occasion to let it shine." — Julia Sand: Sand urging Arthur to reform after Garfield’s assassination "Remember that you are President of the United States. Work only for the good of the country." — Julia Sand: Sand pushing Arthur to rise above factional politics "I am a poor little woman who has always been the youngest of her family ... who would have no comfort in life if she could not occasionally scold some very big man." — Julia Sand: Sand reflecting on her own role as a candid, truth-telling correspondent

Implications: The episode shows that informal influence can matter in politics: private moral persuasion, public pressure, and reform crises can redirect even compromised leaders. It also highlights how women shaped governance long before formal political rights.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Stuff You Missed in History Class

View all episodes from Stuff You Missed in History Class