Macro Musings
Macro Musings

Tom Graff on the July FOMC Meeting and the Recession Debate

Tom Graff is the head of investments for Facet Wealth and has several decades leading fixed income departments. Tom joins David on Macro Musings to provide his thoughts on the recent FOMC meeting, the Q2 2022 GDP numbers and their implications for the economy, and the future path of Fed policy. Spec

Featured Speakers

David Beckworth HostTom Graff Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: David Beckworth and Tom Graff assess the July Fed meeting and weak Q2 GDP, arguing the economy is slowing but not yet in a clear recession. They stress that tightening is already hitting fixed investment and housing, while nominal demand remains strong. Graff says the Fed is still hawkish, but forward guidance is becoming more conditional as markets price a later slowdown and possible cuts.

Main Topics: GDP, recession debate, and the meaning of two negative quarters (Priority: 5/5): Graff argues that two negative GDP prints do not automatically mean recession because labor markets, consumer spending, and nominal demand remain strong. He notes Q1 was distorted by imports, while Q2 weakness was more concerning because fixed investment turned negative. Monetary tightening is already affecting investment and housing (Priority: 5/5): The second quarter GDP decline was driven largely by weaker fixed investment, which Graff sees as evidence that tighter financial conditions are working faster than expected. He points to housing and construction as early channels of Fed tightening. The July FOMC and the Fed's hawkish communication strategy (Priority: 5/5): Graff says Powell remained publicly hawkish to reinforce tightening financial conditions, but the Fed also appeared to withdraw firm forward guidance, suggesting less certainty about September and November decisions. Forward guidance as a policy tool and market discipline mechanism (Priority: 4/5): Graff defends forward guidance as powerful and often effective, even if sometimes criticized. He argues it helped shape outcomes after the GFC, during COVID, and in the current hiking cycle by moving markets ahead of actual policy changes. Market pricing for rates, inflation, and possible cuts (Priority: 4/5): Markets appear to expect rates near 3.5% and then cuts later, implying inflation will soften enough for the Fed to ease. Graff interprets this as a consensus view that inflation is fragile but that growth will weaken enough to force cuts. Interest rates, Treasuries, TIPS, and the dollar system (Priority: 4/5): Graff emphasizes that short rates are mostly driven by expectations of Fed policy, while long rates incorporate neutral rates, inflation, and term premium. He views TIPS breakevens as useful but noisy and believes the dollar system remains dominant globally, limiting concern about fiscal dominance or debt crises.

Key Arguments: A recession is not yet clearly underway because job growth and consumer spending remain strong, and first-quarter GDP was distorted by imports rather than true weakness. The second-quarter GDP report is more troubling because fixed investment turned negative, which likely reflects the Fed's tightening of financial conditions. Monetary policy can transmit quickly through financial conditions even if real activity lags; housing and construction are already responding. Powell’s hawkish rhetoric is partly strategic: the Fed wants markets to keep conditions tight rather than prematurely pricing cuts. Forward guidance is useful because markets often act in advance of Fed moves, amplifying policy without additional rate changes. The Fed’s recent communication suggests it is less committed to specific calendar-based guidance and more willing to stay data dependent. Market pricing for cuts reflects expectations that inflation will fall once policy moves modestly above neutral and demand cools. Treasury yields are best understood as a mix of expected Fed policy, inflation expectations, and term premium; the short end is most Fed-driven. TIPS breakevens should be treated as informative but not exact because liquidity conditions and oil-price swings can distort them. Large U.S. deficits and debt do not automatically translate into higher yields; demand for dollar assets and the centrality of the U.S. financial system remain strong.

Data Points: Q2 real GDP growth: Second consecutive negative quarter - Used in the recession debate and as a sign of slowing growth. Q1 real GDP growth: -1.6% - Beckworth notes it remained negative after revisions, though GDI was positive. Q1 real gross domestic income (GDI): +1.8% - Presented as evidence that first-quarter weakness may have been overstated. Q2 nominal GDP growth: +7.8% annual rate - Beckworth cites this as evidence that aggregate demand is still strong. Q2 nominal GDP increase: $465 billion - Used to show ongoing spending strength despite weak real GDP. Q2 nominal GDP level: $24.85 trillion - BEA figure cited in the discussion of aggregate demand. Q1 nominal GDP growth: +6.6% annual rate - Supports the argument that demand remained robust in early 2022. Fed funds target range after July meeting: 2.25% to 2.50% - The Fed’s policy range after the 75 bps hike. July FOMC hike: 75 basis points - Second consecutive large rate increase discussed as part of the tightening cycle. Market-implied peak rate: Around 3.5% - Graff says markets expect hikes to continue into year-end before cuts. Implied medium-term inflation expectation from TIPS: About 2.3% - Graff references forward TIPS pricing for 2024-2026 inflation. 2-year/3-year forward inflation horizon: 2024-2026 - The period used in discussing market-based inflation expectations. Historical comparison: 2019, 2015-2016, 1994, 2008, 2020 - Used to compare this cycle with prior Fed tightening/easing episodes.

Pivotal Quotes: "I think it's a little silly to say we're in a recession right now because, you know, by most measures, the economy is still extremely strong." — Tom Graff: On whether two negative GDP quarters should be read as an immediate recession signal. "I think the fact that Powell more or less withdrew forward guidance is a sign that he's less sure that having this kind of maximum hawkish position is going to continue to be either necessary or desired." — Tom Graff: On the Fed’s post-meeting communication and the possibility of a slower pace ahead. "You can take them seriously, but not literally." — Tom Graff: On interpreting TIPS breakevens as a market signal for inflation expectations.

Implications: Listeners should expect slower growth, continued Fed vigilance, and more data-dependent policy. Markets may keep pricing eventual cuts, but the Fed is still prioritizing inflation control. Short rates should remain highly sensitive to Fed signaling, while long-term yields reflect broader demand for dollar assets.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Macro Musings

Hosted by David Beckworth of the Mercatus Center, Macro Musings pulls back the curtain on the important macroeconomic issues of the past, present, and future.

View all episodes from Macro Musings