Science Vs
Science Vs

UFOs: Through the Wormhole Again

In 2017, a weird-looking space object called ʻOumuamua whipped past our sun. Now a Harvard scientist is suggesting it miiiight be an alien probe! So we’re revisiting this episode from a few years ago, where we ask: could aliens actually exist? Is there any chance they’ve visited Earth already? We ta

Featured Speakers

Spotify Studios Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode examines UFOs and alien life through a scientific lens, arguing that while alien intelligence elsewhere in the universe is plausible, there is no credible evidence that extraterrestrials have visited Earth. It uses SETI research, the Roswell case, and physics of space travel to show how ordinary explanations account for most UFO sightings.

Main Topics: Aliens may exist, but evidence is absent (Priority: 5/5): The hosts frame the central question: intelligent life elsewhere is scientifically plausible given the vast number of planets, but current evidence does not show aliens have visited Earth. SETI and the search for alien signals (Priority: 5/5): Jill Tarter and Seth Shostak explain how SETI searches for narrowband radio signals that would suggest artificial origin, and why radio remains a practical technology for interstellar communication. Mistaken UFO sightings and scientific skepticism (Priority: 4/5): Personal anecdotes and government examples show that apparent UFOs often turn out to be mundane objects or phenomena, reinforcing the need for careful investigation. Roswell and the Cold War balloon explanation (Priority: 5/5): The famous Roswell incident is presented as a government cover-up, but of secret balloon surveillance programs for detecting Soviet nuclear tests—not aliens. The scale and challenge of interstellar travel (Priority: 5/5): The episode emphasizes the enormous distances between potentially habitable planets and Earth, making travel with known technology effectively impossible on human timescales. Wormholes as speculative science (Priority: 3/5): A physics expert explains that wormholes are theoretically allowed by relativity, but remain unobserved and likely unstable; they are a science-fiction possibility rather than evidence of alien visits.

Key Arguments: The universe likely contains many planets in habitable zones, so alien life somewhere is plausible, but intelligence is a separate and harder question. SETI looks for narrowband radio signals because they are a likely technological signature and can travel at light speed. Most UFO reports have mundane explanations such as balloons, aircraft, birds, weather, Venus, hoaxes, or misidentification. The 1997 SETI 'alien signal' was eventually traced to the SOHO spacecraft, illustrating how even experts can be fooled before data are fully checked. Roswell was a classified balloon program tied to Cold War surveillance, not evidence of alien spacecraft. Using current rocket technology, even nearby potentially habitable worlds are so far away that travel would take tens of thousands to millions of years. Wormholes are mathematically plausible in relativity, but there is no evidence they exist or can be used for travel.

Data Points: Closest potentially habitable planet cited: Proxima b, 4.3 light years away - Used to illustrate how far even the nearest candidate alien world is from Earth. Travel time to Proxima b with current rocket fuel: More than 100,000 years - Estimated time for an alien craft using human-like propulsion to reach Earth from Proxima b. Estimated nearest other aliens: 500 to 1,000 light years away - Seth Shostak's estimate of where the closest intelligent aliens might be. Travel time from 500-1,000 light years away: Well over 10 million years - Shows the impracticality of interstellar travel using current technology. Galaxies visible: Two trillion - Used with planetary counts to underscore the vastness of the universe. Planets in the Milky Way: Roughly one trillion - Part of the argument that planets are abundant across the universe. SETI search coverage: About one eight-ounce glass of the ocean - Jill Tarter's analogy for how little of the cosmic 'ocean' humanity has searched. Unidentified fraction of UFO reports: About 10% - David Clark notes that most sightings are identified, but a minority remain unexplained. Identified UFO reports: About 90% - Most reported UFOs are eventually explained as ordinary or human-made phenomena. SETI data interpretation: 10-20% of static is cosmic radio emission - Explains the challenge of distinguishing artificial signals from background noise. Pages of UK UFO reports reviewed: 60,000 to 80,000 pages - David Clark's long-term research into government UFO files.

Pivotal Quotes: "How much have we searched in 50 years? And my calculation said, Well, it's about one eight-ounce glass of that ocean." — Jill Tarter: Explaining how small SETI's search is relative to the vastness of space. "But this showed that, well, actually, none of that happens. What actually happens is that you go upstairs and fall asleep on your desk." — Seth Shostak: Describing the anticlimax after a candidate alien signal turned out to be a spacecraft transmission. "I challenge anyone to sit down, do the same thing that I did, go through every single one of those pages, and come out at the end thinking, yes, we've been visited by aliens." — David Clark: Summarizing his conclusion after decades of reviewing UFO reports.

Implications: The episode encourages skepticism without dismissing the possibility of alien life. It suggests future discoveries are more likely to come from improved astronomy and signal searches than from UFO lore or conspiracy narratives.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Science Vs

There are a lot of fads, blogs and strong opinions, but then there’s SCIENCE. Science Vs is the show from Spotify Studios that finds out what’s fact, what’s not, and what’s somewhere in between. We do the hard work of sifting through all the science so you don't have to and cover everything from 5G and ADHD, to Fluoride and Fasting Diets.

View all episodes from Science Vs