Catalyst with Shayle Kann
Catalyst with Shayle Kann

Understanding the transmission bottleneck

Editor’s note: There’s momentum behind permitting reform in the U.S. Congress right now. It could mean unstopping a serious bottleneck in climate tech — transmission. So we’re revisiting an episode from last May with Grid Strategies’ Rob Gramlich to understand how we got here, the impacts on climate

Featured Speakers

Rob Gramlich Guest

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode argues that U.S. transmission is a core bottleneck for decarbonization, with congestion rising, interconnection queues worsening, and new buildout far below what electrification and clean energy growth require. Rob Gramlich explains how historical transmission growth stalled, why current interconnection rules are breaking down, and why proactive regional planning, permitting, and cost allocation are the practical path forward.

Main Topics: Historical transmission buildout and stagnation (Priority: 5/5): Gramlich traces U.S. transmission history: major buildout in the 1970s, a long lull through the 1980s-2000s, a wind-driven surge around 2008-2013, and a sharp slowdown over the last decade to near-trickle levels. Congestion on the existing grid (Priority: 5/5): The conversation explains how limited line capacity creates congestion costs, curtailment, and higher prices for customers, while reducing revenues for generators; these costs are rising as load and generation grow. Interconnection queue dysfunction (Priority: 5/5): New projects now face multi-year studies, repeated restudies, and escalating upgrade costs, because developers are charged for network upgrades that benefit many future projects, causing queue churn and delays. Solutions: planning, permitting, and paying (Priority: 5/5): Gramlich emphasizes proactive transmission planning, streamlined permitting, and broad cost allocation across beneficiaries as the model that enabled successful buildout in Texas and the Midwest. Grid-enhancing technologies and storage (Priority: 4/5): He notes alternatives like dynamic line ratings, topology optimization, power flow control, and storage-as-transmission can help relieve constraints quickly, but they cannot replace major new transmission buildout. Policy momentum and FERC reform (Priority: 4/5): The episode highlights emerging permitting reform and FERC rulemaking, but warns that recent policy actions have not yet solved the problem and that durable regional political support is still needed. Climate and electrification stakes (Priority: 5/5): Transmission is framed as an existential constraint for IRA-driven clean energy deployment, EVs, heat pumps, data centers, and other new loads, with modeling suggesting most climate benefits could be lost without grid expansion.

Key Arguments: Transmission buildout is not impossible; U.S. regions have done it before, proving the grid can be expanded when planning and financing align. Congestion is becoming more expensive because the grid is approaching physical limits; without new lines, prices and curtailment will worsen quickly. The current interconnection process is broken because it studies projects one by one instead of building the network first, leading to endless restudies and speculation. The best precedent is proactive regional transmission planning for known future generation and load, paired with broad cost allocation to beneficiaries. Permitting is difficult but manageable when projects are well planned and backed by regional institutions; most lines can be approved if the process is handled well. Grid-enhancing technologies and storage can help in the near term, but they are complements, not substitutes, for major transmission expansion. The clean-energy transition now depends on transmission capacity more than ever because the IRA is driving both more generation and more load growth.

Data Points: High-voltage transmission growth needed by 2050: triple - Princeton Net Zero America estimate cited for U.S. HVDC transmission expansion to support high electrification. High-voltage transmission growth needed by 2030: ~60% increase - Princeton Net Zero America estimate for near-term capacity expansion. Congestion costs change: doubled from 2020 to 2021 - Grid Strategies report referenced by Gramlich. Interconnection timeline: over 4 years on average - Average time for bulk power system interconnection today versus 1-2 years previously. Interconnection cost: $200-$300/kW, sometimes $800-$1,000/kW - Estimated current cost for project interconnection and network upgrades. Generation in interconnection queues: about 2 terawatts - Mostly wind, solar, and storage projects in the U.S. queue. Operating U.S. generating capacity: about 1.25 terawatts - Current total generating capacity on the grid, used for comparison to queue size. High-voltage transmission built in 2013: roughly 4,000 miles - Wind-driven buildout from MISO and ERCOT-era projects. Recent transmission buildout pace: couple hundred miles - Current annual high-capacity line additions, less than 10% of a decade ago. Community economic development funding in IRA: $760 million - Program mentioned as support for local hosting benefits around transmission. VPP capacity cited in sponsor copy: 3.4 gigawatts - EnergyHub virtual power plant capacity across 2.5 million customer devices. Devices aggregated in sponsor copy: 2.5 million - EnergyHub customer devices participating in VPPs. Potential climate benefit at risk: 80% - Jesse Jenkins/Repeat Project modeling referenced as grid-dependent IRA emissions reductions. Projected solar buildout referenced: over 100 GW per year - Expected U.S. solar build rates later in the decade in modeled scenarios.

Pivotal Quotes: "A lot of people's first thought about transmission is, oh yeah, that's pretty important too, but it's impossible, so why waste our time? And I strongly disagree with that because we did it and we know how to do it." — Rob Gramlich: On why transmission expansion is feasible and historically proven. "We got a lot of work to do." — Rob Gramlich: Summing up the scale of reform and buildout still required. "This is not rocket science. Damn it, we should do this now." — Rob Gramlich: His overall view that transmission problems are solvable with political and regulatory will.

Implications: Without faster planning, permitting, and cost-sharing for transmission, congestion, interconnection delays, and curtailment will constrain clean-energy deployment, raise prices, and undermine IRA-driven electrification. The grid is now the gating factor.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Catalyst with Shayle Kann

View all episodes from Catalyst with Shayle Kann