Speaking of Psychology
Speaking of Psychology

What Makes Things Funny? With Peter McGraw, PhD

What is it about puns that tickles our funny bone? Or dad jokes? How about a person slipping on a banana peel? What could possibly tie all these very different things together under the heading “humor”? Just in time for April Fool’s Day, we explore that question with Peter McGraw, PhD, a marketing a

Featured Speakers

Peter McGraw Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode explores why humans find things funny through Dr. Peter McGraw’s benign violation theory: humor emerges when something is simultaneously a violation and harmless. The conversation covers research methods, timing in tragedy, cultural and individual differences, humor in animals, workplace comedy, and how humor can be used ethically or offensively. McGraw argues that comedy is highly contextual and that “thinking funny” can improve creativity and innovation, even if everyone should not try to be funny at work.

Main Topics: Benign Violation Theory: McGraw explains his core framework: something is funny when it is both a violation and benign at the same time, resolving tension by signaling safety. How Humor Is Studied Experimentally: The discussion details lab methods used to test amusement, offense, boredom, laughter, and smiling, including contrived social interactions and joke judgments. Timing, Tragedy, and Context: The episode examines why some jokes about tragedies become funny over time and why humor depends on the right amount of distance rather than a fixed rule. Culture, Individual Differences, and Universality: McGraw emphasizes that humor is highly culture- and audience-dependent, though physical comedy and play-related laughter may be the most universal forms. Humor, Intelligence, and Gender: The conversation addresses whether smart people are funnier, whether people can be intelligent without humor, and why gender comparisons often oversimplify comedy research. Humor as a Social Tool: McGraw discusses humorous complaining, punching up versus punching down, and how jokes can build rapport, diffuse negativity, or reinforce prejudice. Comedy Lessons for Work and Creativity: The episode closes by arguing that not everyone should try to be funny at work, but everyone can benefit from thinking like comedians, especially using reversals to solve problems.

Key Arguments: Humor is best explained by a single parsimonious theory rather than separate theories for puns, pratfalls, and sarcasm; benign violation theory unifies them. A joke can fail in two distinct ways: it can be too benign and boring, or too much of a violation and offensive. Surprise is not necessary for humor; people can laugh at familiar jokes or events they already know. Time does not automatically make tragedy funny; what matters is the right amount of time and distance, after which jokes may become boring. Humor is deeply contextual: audience values, relationship to the subject, setting, alcohol, and culture all influence whether something is funny. Physical comedy is the closest thing to a universal humor form because it is rooted in play and appears in nonhuman primates and other mammals. Intelligence helps with producing humor because it supports creativity, knowledge, and quick simultaneous appraisal of wrongness and harmlessness. Humorous complaining can be effective for sharing or going viral, but it may reduce pressure for practical change. At work, people should think funny rather than try to be funny; bad humor can bore or offend and undermine inclusion. Good comedy often “punches up” at the powerful rather than punching down at marginalized groups.

Data Points: Research duration: More than a dozen years - McGraw has studied humor for over a dozen years. Peak timing after Hurricane Katrina parody: About 39 days - Humor about the Hurricane Katrina parody account peaked around 39 days after the disaster. Number of humor theory families: 3 - McGraw summarizes classic theories as superiority, relief/release, and incongruity. Dimensions measured in humor studies: 3 - Studies commonly assess amusement, offense, and boredom to capture both success and failure of jokes. Types of social distance discussed: 3 - Time, physical distance, and relational distance were all described as factors that can make violations feel benign. Ratio of judging response modes: 2 - McGraw distinguishes between producing laughter and responding to attempts at humor as separate sides of a sense of humor. Universality claim about physical comedy: Most universal form of comedy - Physical play, tickling, and pratfalls were described as the closest thing to universal humor.

Pivotal Quotes: "People laugh at, they're amused by, they judge something as funny if it is simultaneously wrong yet okay, threatening yet safe, doesn't make sense yet makes sense." — Peter McGraw: Core explanation of benign violation theory. "Comedy is tragedy plus the right amount of time." — Peter McGraw: Reframing the old saying about tragedy and humor. "I used to think we should, and now I think only some of us should." — Peter McGraw: His view on whether people should try to be funny at work.

Implications: Humor is not random; it is measurable, contextual, and ethically consequential. For listeners and workplaces, the lesson is to value timing, audience, and intent—and to use comedy as a tool for creativity, not just attention.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Speaking of Psychology

View all episodes from Speaking of Psychology