Volts
Volts

What? The sun isn't always shining?!

In this episode, Princeton professor and energy modeler Jesse Jenkins tackles the question of how we can build a decarbonized energy system that relies on inherently variable wind and solar power. (PDF transcript) (Active transcript) Text transcript: David Roberts If you’ve spent much time discussin

Featured Speakers

David Roberts GuestJesse Jenkins Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: David Roberts and Jesse Jenkins argue that wind and solar’s variability is a real engineering challenge, but not a showstopper. They walk through grid balancing needs from milliseconds to seasons, showing that batteries, demand flexibility, transmission, long-duration storage, and eventually clean firm power can cover each timescale. The key thesis: decarbonization is an innovation-and-deployment problem, not a fundamental impossibility.

Main Topics: Why wind and solar are worth the trouble (Priority: 5/5): Jenkins explains that wind and solar are now the cheapest sources of electricity in most places, and also provide energy security, air-pollution, and climate benefits. Variability is the main tradeoff, but cheap clean power makes solving it worthwhile. Grid variability across multiple time scales (Priority: 5/5): The discussion breaks intermittency into seconds, minutes-to-hours, hours-to-days, weeks, and seasons. Each creates a different operational problem, from frequency regulation to diurnal ramping to multi-week low-renewable events. Short-term balancing: inertia and frequency regulation (Priority: 4/5): For sub-second and second-scale disturbances, the grid relies on physical inertia, operating reserves, and increasingly batteries. Synthetic inertia and synchronized condensers are described as workable options if needed. Hourly and daily balancing with batteries and demand response (Priority: 5/5): Battery storage and flexible demand can handle the sunset ramp and daily load shifts, reducing reliance on gas peakers. Jenkins emphasizes that many loads—EV charging, water heating, industrial heat, data centers—can be made more flexible. Long-duration and seasonal firmness (Priority: 5/5): For weeks- and season-scale shortages, the conversation turns to clean firm generation (advanced nuclear, geothermal, gas with CCS, possibly hydrogen turbines) and very cheap long-duration storage such as iron-air batteries, compressed air, hydrogen, or synthetic fuels. Transmission as a variability smoother (Priority: 4/5): Bigger interconnections reduce variability by spreading weather-correlated supply and demand across larger geographies. Transmission is portrayed as a crucial complement at all timescales, especially daily and regional balancing. A roadmap for power-sector decarbonization (Priority: 5/5): Jenkins outlines a practical path: rapidly deploy wind, solar, batteries, demand flexibility, retire coal, retain existing gas and nuclear for firmness, and build transmission. This could cut emissions 80-90% in the next decade while new tools mature.

Key Arguments: Wind and solar are now the cheapest electricity in most of the world, so their variability must be managed because they are economically attractive, not just because of climate policy. The grid already balances supply and demand in real time; renewables add complexity, but the system is designed to manage variability and contingencies. You do not need 100% backup for variable renewables because geographic diversity, batteries, demand response, and existing firm resources reduce the need for one-for-one replacement. Second-to-second grid stability is largely a solved engineering problem through inertia, frequency regulation, and battery response; synthetic inertia remains promising but not essential today. Minutes-to-hours ramps are addressable with batteries, flexible demand, and, in the near term, some gas turbines or other fast-ramping firm capacity. Daily and diurnal balancing will increasingly be handled by batteries and flexible loads, though current economics still favor two- to six-hour lithium-ion systems. Weeks-to-seasonal balancing remains the hardest problem and likely requires a mix of long-duration storage, clean firm generation, and possibly limited fossil backup with carbon management. Transmission expansion is essential because larger balancing areas smooth weather-driven variability and reduce the need for local backup. Industrial heat, EV charging, and electrolysis could become major 'demand sinks' that absorb surplus renewable power without increasing firmness requirements much. The transition is feasible if society walks and chews gum: deploy existing solutions now while innovating toward longer-duration storage and clean firm options for the 2030s.

Data Points: Wind and solar cost trend: Cheapest electricity, period, in most of the world - Jenkins argues cost declines from experience curves and scale have made wind and solar the lowest-cost generation sources in many markets. Grid frequency: 60 hertz in the U.S. - Used to explain why supply and demand must be balanced continuously and why generators and motors are synchronized. Frequency deviation tolerance: About 1% deviation - A small frequency mismatch can trigger devices to disconnect and create cascading failures. Battery frequency-regulation duration: 15 to 30 minutes - Enough battery energy to provide second-to-minute grid frequency regulation because the service is near-neutral over time. National frequency-regulation need: A few thousand megawatts nationally - Jenkins notes the U.S. needs only a relatively small amount of capacity for frequency regulation, which batteries can cover. Battery ramping advantage: 100 MW battery can provide 200 MW of ramping - Because it can switch from 100 MW consumption to 100 MW production nearly instantly. Typical lithium-ion battery duration: 2 to 6 hours - Presented as the most economic range for current grid-scale lithium-ion batteries. Battery installed cost: $250 to $350 per kWh - Approximate current installed cost range for lithium-ion grid batteries. Pack cost target: About $100 per kWh total system cost - Referenced as a DOE-style stretch goal that would require lower pack costs and lower balance-of-system expenses. Existing demand reliability: 99.99% to 99.999% - Describes 'firm demand' that normally expects near-continuous service. Carbon reduction pathway: 80% to 90% reduction - Jenkins says the next decade can deliver this level of emissions reduction in the power sector with current deployment pathways. Coal retirement target: By 2030 - He says all U.S. coal plants are effectively offline in modeled net-zero pathways by 2030. Long-duration storage cost need: About two orders of magnitude cheaper than lithium-ion - For storage to cover multi-day to seasonal balancing, it must be vastly cheaper than current lithium-ion batteries. Low-cost long-duration storage range: $1 to $10 per kWh - Approximate target range mentioned for storage capacity cost to compete for firming roles.

Pivotal Quotes: "The sun, it seems, is not always shining. What's worse, the wind is not always blowing." — David Roberts: Opening framing of the episode’s central question about renewable variability. "You don't need 100% backup." — Jesse Jenkins: Core rebuttal to the idea that variable renewables require a full one-for-one fleet of dispatchable plants. "These are not barriers or impenetrable walls that we can't pass. These are challenges." — Jesse Jenkins: Summarizes the episode’s optimistic but pragmatic view of decarbonization.

Implications: Listeners should take variability seriously but not as a reason to abandon wind and solar. The likely future is a more flexible, digitally controlled grid with batteries, demand response, transmission, and new clean firm resources filling the hardest gaps.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Volts

View all episodes from Volts