Animal Spirits Podcast
Animal Spirits Podcast

Why Andy Dufresne Would Make a Good Money Manager (EP.43)

On this week's show we're joined by Morgan Housel. We discuss Elon Musk's surprising announcement, the odds we give Tesla for going private, the bubble prospects in venture capital, the impressive rise of Tinder, Peloton & Slack, is loss aversion a fallacy, which fictional charact

Featured Speakers

The Compound Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode centers on Elon Musk’s “funding secured” Tesla tweet and its market/regulatory implications, then broadens into a nuanced debate about whether public markets are shrinking and losing the best growth companies to private capital. The hosts argue that while private markets are booming and some public-market opportunities are being bypassed, the story is more complicated than a simple “public bad, private good” narrative, with valuation, access, and profitability differences shaping outcomes.

Main Topics: Elon Musk’s Tesla tweet and SEC scrutiny (Priority: 5/5): The hosts react to Musk’s sudden Twitter announcement that he was considering taking Tesla private at $420 with “funding secured,” calling it shocking, potentially manipulative, and emblematic of Musk’s troll-like behavior and improvisational communication style. Public markets vs. private markets (Priority: 5/5): A major theme is whether the shrinking number of public companies means investors are missing out on growth. The discussion weighs structural changes, microcap attrition, and the growth of private capital against the idea that public investors still capture much of the value creation when companies eventually list. Venture capital bubble and fundraising excess (Priority: 4/5): The hosts explore whether the influx of capital into VC—especially via megafunds and new entrants—has pushed private valuations and fundraising sizes too high, potentially encouraging inefficient spending and inflated rounds. Private-company examples: Tinder and Peloton (Priority: 3/5): Tinder and Peloton are used as examples of private companies with real revenue and strong business models, showing that many modern startups are no longer pre-revenue hype cases like the late-1990s bubble era. Snap’s business challenges despite public status (Priority: 4/5): Snap is discussed as a case study in the gap between user-growth narratives and public-market profitability standards, highlighting that even large consumer platforms can struggle with monetization and cash flow. Books, psychology, and loss aversion (Priority: 3/5): The conversation shifts to books and behavioral finance, especially the idea of loss aversion. The hosts strongly endorse the concept in practice, despite a cited study questioning it, and connect it to personal, market, and writing experiences. Fictional portfolio managers (Priority: 2/5): A lighter segment asks which fictional character should manage a portfolio, with answers like Scrooge McDuck, Sherlock Holmes, and Andy Dufresne chosen for traits like resilience, intelligence, and forensic skill.

Key Arguments: Musk’s “funding secured” tweet looked like market manipulation because it bypassed normal disclosure channels and was broadcast in a highly informal, public-facing way. The tweet’s phrasing will likely become historically memorable regardless of the deal’s outcome because it was so unusual and consequential. The decline in public companies is real in headline terms, but much of the disappearance is due to microcaps and structural market changes like decimalization and lower analyst coverage. Private capital has expanded enormously, but not all private fundraising is directly cannibalizing public markets; some is simply substituting for public funding at earlier stages or in smaller companies. Public-market investors still capture a large share of dollar-value growth when companies go public at much higher valuations, even if VC investors capture outsized percentage gains. The rise of megafunds and late-stage private rounds can lead companies to raise more than they need, encouraging wasteful acquisitions and expansion ahead of demand. Private markets operate differently from public markets because long lockups and exclusive access mean bubbles can persist without the same “rush to the door” dynamic. Many modern private companies have significant revenue, but public-market scrutiny around cash flow and profitability still exposes weak business models quickly. Loss aversion feels intuitively real to the hosts; in practice, people react more strongly to losses than gains, and this shapes investing and writing behavior.

Data Points: Tesla offer price: $420/share - Elon Musk’s tweet said he was considering taking Tesla private at this price. Twitter phrase used: “funding secured” - The tweet’s wording became a central point of the discussion and SEC scrutiny. Private capital growth: $5 trillion - The hosts cited growth in private equity and venture/private capital since 2000. Time period for private capital growth: 18 years since 2000 - Used to frame the magnitude of capital migration into private markets. Over-the-counter pink sheet stocks: over 10,500 - Cited as evidence that many tiny public companies still exist outside major exchanges. Facebook value added to public markets: $400 billion - Used to argue public investors can still benefit heavily from big-company growth after IPO. Public company filing size example: $15 billion valuation - Used in discussion of Juul’s July fundraising round. Juul fundraising: $650 million - Example of a private company raising a very large round. Tinder revenue run rate: over $800 million in 2018 - Used as an example of a private company with meaningful monetization. Peloton annual revenue pace: more than $700 million - Used to illustrate that some private companies are already substantial businesses. Snap daily users: 188 million - Q2 2018 users after a 1.5% decline. Snap prior user count: 191 million - Referenced as the prior quarter comparison for user decline. Snap revenue: $262 million - Q2 2018 earnings beat expectations despite continuing losses. Snap net loss: $353 million - Described as a quarterly loss that was smaller than the prior quarter. Snap prior quarter net loss: $385 million - Used to note the company destroyed less cash than in the previous quarter. Prince Al-Walid Talal investment in Snap: $250 million for 2.3% stake - Mentioned as a major private-style backing for the company. Snap stock move: up 11% after hours, then down 7% next day - Showed volatile investor reaction to earnings.

Pivotal Quotes: "“I’m considering taking Tesla private at 420 funding secured”" — Elon Musk: The tweet that triggered the opening discussion and SEC-related concerns. "“The basic premise of US securities laws is that you can’t raise money broadly from public retail investors without giving them the disclosures required of public companies.”" — Matt Levine (quoted by hosts): Used to argue Musk’s tweet was an obvious workaround attempt that securities law should not permit. "“Losses twice as strong as they feel gains”" — Michael Batnick: Used in the behavioral finance discussion to summarize why loss aversion feels obviously true in real life.

Implications: Investors should expect more capital, bigger late-stage private rounds, and more tension between private valuation stories and public-market discipline. The episode suggests public markets still matter, but scrutiny, profitability, and disclosure remain decisive.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Animal Spirits Podcast

Animal Spirits is a show about markets, life, and investing. Join Michael Batnick and Ben Carlson as they talk about what they're reading, writing, listening to and watching. Look for new episodes every Wednesday morning. See our disclosures here - https://ritholtzwealth.com/podcast-youtube-disclosures/

View all episodes from Animal Spirits Podcast