Unhedged
Unhedged

Will China back down?

The White House has announced dizzyingly high — and hard-to-follow — tariffs on goods from China. And Beijing has responded. But the real trade war may be between the US president and the American consumer. Today on the show, Katie Martin and Aiden Reiter dig into the tariffs battle and discuss Chin

Featured Speakers

FT Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode argues that Trump’s escalating tariffs on China are the central market story, but that China is not helpless: it can retaliate through currency policy, export restrictions, and reduced Treasury purchases. The hosts conclude that the US is more exposed than it admits because it relies on Chinese goods that are hard to replace quickly, while China can likely absorb more pain and has political tools to sustain a longer standoff.

Main Topics: Escalating US-China tariffs (Priority: 5/5): The hosts walk through the rapid ratcheting of Trump’s tariffs on Chinese imports and note that the administration’s posture implies China has little leverage, which they dispute. China’s leverage in trade and markets (Priority: 5/5): Discussion centers on China’s ability to retaliate through currency depreciation, export controls, and by withholding Treasury purchases, all of which could pressure the US. US dependence on Chinese goods (Priority: 5/5): The episode emphasizes that many imported items—from electronics to furniture to industrial inputs—are difficult to replace domestically and will affect consumers and businesses. Treasuries, dollars, and funding the US economy (Priority: 4/5): They explain how trade deficits recycle dollars into Treasury purchases, and why a decline in Chinese demand for Treasuries could raise US borrowing costs. Political asymmetry between China and the US (Priority: 4/5): China’s authoritarian system may better absorb economic pain and nationalist backlash, while US leaders face democratic pressure if tariffs raise prices or disrupt supply chains. Market reaction and exemptions (Priority: 4/5): The market’s relief rally after a tariff pause faded once participants realized the scale of US-China trade exposure; exemptions for smartphones and electronics showed the administration’s limits.

Key Arguments: Trump’s tariff strategy is highly focused on China and has escalated far beyond a symbolic negotiating tactic. China has meaningful leverage because it supplies hard-to-replace goods, controls its currency, and can reduce or stop buying US Treasuries. The US is more vulnerable than it appears because Chinese imports are embedded in consumer goods and industrial supply chains. Exempting smartphones and some electronics suggests the US administration is already backing off when confronted with the practical costs of its own policy. China can source many US exports elsewhere more easily than the US can replace Chinese imports, making the balance of pain unequal. A sustained decline in Chinese dollar accumulation could weaken global demand for dollars and increase US funding costs. China may not need to “blink” in the conventional sense because it can simply wait, retaliate selectively, and continue its industrial strategy.

Data Points: Tariff rate on US imports from China: 145% - Stated as the current level after repeated increases; the hosts note it has changed rapidly. Previous tariff rate on China: 125% - The hosts say this was the tariff rate the last time they recorded the podcast. Effective tariff rate after exemptions: around 120% - Estimated current effective rate after smartphones and electronics were exempted. Initial reciprocal tariff added to China: 34% - Trump’s April 2 “reciprocal” tariff announcement. Retaliatory tariff response by China: 34% then 50% - China matched Trump’s initial move, then escalated further after Trump raised tariffs again. Additional tariff Trump threatened on China: 50% - Trump’s next escalation after China retaliated. Tariffs on China after the pause on others: additional 125% - Trump paused tariffs on most countries but kept and raised China tariffs. Potential total tariff range on China: 160% to 170% - Hosts estimate total tariffs when combining various layers, including earlier and Venezuela-related measures. U.S. furniture imports from China: about 30% - Used to illustrate how deeply Chinese imports are embedded in everyday consumer goods. China’s share of global rare earths: about 90% - Mentioned to show China’s leverage over critical inputs for magnets, airplanes, and more. U.S. market reaction to tariff reprieve: 9% surge - The US market rose sharply after a 90-day tariff reprieve before falling back.

Pivotal Quotes: "There is still only one story that matters in markets, and it's Donald Trump's trade tariffs." — Katie Martin: Opening framing of the episode’s market focus. "China has a lot of like. If not more than the United States." — Aiden Reiter: Aiden argues that China is not leverage-free and may have the stronger hand. "It means some very expensive iPhones. So, effectively, the administration... realizes that we actually need this stuff and that we can't make it quickly at home." — Katie Martin: Discussion of smartphone and electronics exemptions exposing US supply-chain dependence.

Implications: The tariff fight is likely to keep pressuring markets, raising consumer prices, and exposing US supply-chain dependence. China can retaliate through currency and Treasury channels, so the standoff may persist without a clean win for either side.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Unhedged

Katie Martin, Robert Armstrong and other markets nerds at the Financial Times explain the big ideas behind what’s happening in finance right now. Every Tuesday and Thursday. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

View all episodes from Unhedged