Tech Wont Save Us
Tech Wont Save Us

Will the Pope Be An Ally Against AI? w/ Paolo Benanti

Paris Marx is joined by Paolo Benanti to discuss what Pope Leo XIV’s statements on AI, the publications under Pope Francis, and the ethics of AI from a theological perspective.Paolo Benanti is an author, academic, and priest. He teaches at the Pontifical Gregorian University and was an advisor to Po

Featured Speakers

Paris Marx HostPaolo Benanti Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode examines how the Catholic Church, under Pope Francis and newly elected Pope Leo XIV, is developing a serious ethical framework for AI. Guest Paolo Benanti argues the Church is not anti-technology; it sees AI as a tool that can support human flourishing, but warns that its social effects—on work, dignity, journalism, democracy, and peace—depend on human use and governance.

Main Topics: The Vatican’s growing engagement with AI (Priority: 5/5): Paris Marks frames Pope Leo XIV’s early focus on AI as significant and ties it to a longer Vatican effort under Pope Francis to address the social impacts of technology. Paolo Benanti’s path from engineering to theology (Priority: 4/5): Benanti explains how his background in engineering, Franciscan life, philosophy, and ethics led him to study the human implications of digital technologies early, before AI became mainstream. AI as a general-purpose technology (Priority: 5/5): Benanti argues AI should be understood like electricity: a broad infrastructure that affects many sectors, not a narrow tool limited to one domain, requiring governance across society. Church teaching on technology and human flourishing (Priority: 5/5): The conversation emphasizes that the Church’s stance is positive toward technologies that help people flourish, while insisting the key question is how humans deploy them and whether they become tools or weapons. AI, democracy, journalism, and social justice (Priority: 4/5): Benanti describes his advisory work with the Italian government, especially on AI’s impact on journalism and public opinion, linking AI to democratic trust, inequality, and social stability. Multifaith and multistakeholder AI ethics initiatives (Priority: 4/5): The episode discusses the Rome call, Hiroshima declaration, and wider interreligious efforts to build consensus against weaponization and toward common-good uses of AI. Pope Leo XIV’s AI agenda and future role (Priority: 5/5): Benanti interprets Leo XIV’s early statements as signaling concern for human dignity, labor, and social justice, while urging patience as the pope develops a broader policy approach.

Key Arguments: The Church is not opposed to AI in principle; it supports technologies that serve human nature and enable flourishing. AI’s risks are primarily social and political, not metaphysical: the danger lies in how humans use it. AI should be treated as a general-purpose technology with wide effects, similar to electricity, requiring broad governance. The key ethical question is not whether AI exists, but what kind of order and power distribution it creates in society. AI can support science, but it can also intensify propaganda, manipulation, and misinformation through powerful storytelling. In journalism and democracy, AI may shape public opinion by filtering reality and making it harder for people to evaluate facts. Religious traditions are useful allies in AI ethics because they can convene diverse actors around the common good and human dignity. Pope Leo XIV’s comments suggest continuity with Pope Francis and a likely emphasis on labor, dignity, and justice. Calls for AI ethics should not be seen as a checklist for proving a product is ethical, but as a cultural push to keep ethical questions alive. Human beings should not understand AI as a competitor to humanity, but as a possible extender or enhancer of human capability.

Data Points: Birth year: 1973 - Benanti says he was born in 1973 and grew up alongside early personal computers. Dissertation year: 2008 - He says his PhD work on the intersection of technology and human beings took shape in 2008. Technology areas studied in dissertation: 3 - He focused on nanotechnology, brain implants, and AI. Church ethics initiative launch year: 2020 - He says the Rome Call for AI Ethics began in Rome in 2020. Number of Abrahamic religions signing together: 3 - He notes the first joint document on AI was signed by Christian, Muslim, and Jewish representatives. Religions at Hiroshima declaration: 21 - He says 21 different religions signed a later document in Hiroshima. World Day of Social Communications statement date: January 2024 - Paris references Pope Francis’s message warning about AI’s effects on digital communication. Pope Leo XIV election: May 2025 - The host notes Leo XIV was chosen in May and quickly began speaking about AI.

Pivotal Quotes: "Everything that is serving the human nature and the human beings, it's positive. Everything that is allowed people to flourish, it's really positive." — Paolo Benanti: Benanti summarizes the Church’s basic technology ethic early in the interview. "We don't have a problem with AI. We could have a problem with some ends of some human using the AI." — Paolo Benanti: He argues the moral issue lies in human use, not the technology itself. "If I understand AI as a competitor of the human beings, I'm in the wrong position." — Paolo Benanti: He cautions against framing AI as rival rather than instrument or enhancer.

Implications: The episode suggests religious institutions may become influential AI critics and partners in governance, especially on labor, dignity, and misinformation. For listeners, it reframes AI ethics as a broad social and moral project, not just a technical one.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Tech Wont Save Us

Silicon Valley wants to shape our future, but why should we let it? Every Thursday, Paris Marx is joined by a new guest to critically examine the tech industry, its big promises, and the people behind them. Tech Won’t Save Us challenges the notion that tech alone can drive our world forward by showing that separating tech from politics has consequences for us all, especially the most vulnerable. It’s not your usual tech podcast.

View all episodes from Tech Wont Save Us