Intelligence Squared
Intelligence Squared

Words that Changed The World, with Jeremy Irons and Carey Mulligan

To celebrate some of the most influential and impactful speeches ever made, we invited Barack Obama’s director of speechwriting, Cody Keenan and Tony Blair’s former speechwriter, Philip Collins, to discuss the power of the spoken word. Our host was journalist and presenter Emily Maitlis, with actors

Featured Speakers

Abraham Lincoln GuestElie Wiesel Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: An Intelligence Squared anniversary event celebrated the spoken word through performances of landmark speeches and discussion by speechwriters Phil Collins and Cody Keenan. The conversation explored why great speeches matter, how they are crafted, how context determines their power, and why rhetoric can inspire, persuade, or mislead—illustrated through Lincoln, Obama, Churchill, Elizabeth I, Pankhurst, Shakespeare, Kennedy, King, and Wiesel.

Main Topics: The power and purpose of speeches (Priority: 5/5): The event framed speeches as tools that can persuade, inspire, shape public memory, and move audiences from passive listening to active debate. Speechwriting as craft and collaboration (Priority: 5/5): Phil Collins and Cody Keenan described speechwriting as a discipline shaped by rhythm, audience, performance, editing, and the speaker’s own voice rather than ghostwriting alone. Great speeches in historical context (Priority: 5/5): Each speech was analyzed as a product of its moment—Gettysburg, Selma, Churchill in wartime, Tilbury, St. Crispin’s Day, the moon speech, and Wiesel’s Holocaust reflections. Rhetoric, authenticity, and delivery (Priority: 4/5): The panel emphasized that belief, tone, body language, and delivery often matter as much as content, and that audiences quickly detect inauthenticity. Women, leadership, and rhetorical barriers (Priority: 4/5): Elizabeth I and Emmeline Pankhurst were used to show how women speakers used plain, rational language to challenge exclusion and claim authority. The dark side of rhetoric (Priority: 4/5): The discussion acknowledged that speeches can also inflame hatred, justify violence, and enable destructive politics when wielded by demagogues. Modern media and the changing life of speeches (Priority: 3/5): The speakers contrasted radio, television, and the internet/Twitter era, arguing that mass attention is more fragmented today while speeches still remain necessary.

Key Arguments: Great speeches speak to something larger than the immediate occasion and therefore become memorable beyond the event itself. Short speeches are harder to write than long ones because compression requires precision, cadence, and the removal of every unnecessary word. Speechwriting is collaborative: the writer supplies structure and language, but the leader’s edits, voice, and performance are decisive. Historic context determines whether a speech resonates; speeches made during war, civil rights struggle, or national crisis tend to endure more strongly. Audience trust depends on perceived authenticity; listeners can detect when a speaker does not believe what they are saying. Rhetoric can be both constructive and destructive: it can mobilize reform and national purpose, but it can also legitimize racism, war, and authoritarianism. Modern political rhetoric is often flatter and less quotational than older traditions because audiences are broader, media cycles are faster, and public attention is fragmented. Obama’s speeches were presented as exceptional because he paired presidential authority with careful rhetorical craftsmanship and strong self-editing. Women speakers such as Elizabeth I and Pankhurst often had to address gender prejudice directly and use rational, restrained language to assert legitimacy. Elie Wiesel’s speech showed that moral memory and naming victims are essential to resisting indifference and dehumanization.

Data Points: Intelligence Squared age: 15 years - The organization was celebrating its fifteenth birthday. Podcast downloads: almost 15 million - Mentioned in the opening remarks as a milestone for Intelligence Squared podcasts. Gettysburg Address length: 272 words - Described as the benchmark for brevity and compression in presidential speechmaking. Gettysburg Address syllable count: 204 of 272 words were single-syllable - Used to illustrate Lincoln’s plain style and precision. Battle of Britain speech timing: after the Battle of Britain - Context given for Churchill’s 'Their finest hour' speech. Gettysburg versions: 5 extant versions - Discussed to rebut the myth that Lincoln wrote it on the back of an envelope. Selma march date: March 7, 1965 - Referenced as the date of the original voting-rights march at Selma. Selma anniversary: 50th anniversary - Obama’s Selma speech was delivered on the anniversary of the march. Civil-rights time span: 241 years in - Used to frame the ongoing American debate over national identity and inclusion. Kerry Mulligan departure time: 7:20 - The host noted Mulligan had to leave for another engagement. Obama campaign year: 2007 - Cody Keenan said the Obama campaign approached him then. John Kennedy speech error example: 49 points - Phil Collins recounted a deputy prime minister who announced he had 49 points to make. Obama eulogy speech context: Charleston church shooting / Pinckney speech - Discussed when Obama considered singing 'Amazing Grace'. Millennium lecture year: 1999 - Elie Wiesel’s speech was introduced as part of the Clinton White House millennium lectures. Free-speech media shift: 280 characters - Referenced in discussion of Twitter and the diminishing centrality of long-form rhetoric.

Pivotal Quotes: "the world will little note nor long remember what we say here" — Abraham Lincoln: From the Gettysburg Address, highlighted as a model of humility and rhetorical paradox. "I have a dream today." — Martin Luther King Jr.: From the 'I Have a Dream' speech, the most famous passage discussed near the end. "Indifference is not a response. Indifference is not a beginning, it is an end." — Elie Wiesel: From 'The Perils of Indifference,' used to close the evening on moral responsibility.

Implications: The event argues that speeches still matter, but only when grounded in authenticity, context, and memorable craft. In a fragmented media era, leaders who can organize ideas clearly and speak credibly may still shape public life and moral imagination.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Intelligence Squared

View all episodes from Intelligence Squared