Inside Economics
Inside Economics

Work and Work from Anywhere

Adam Ozimek Chief Economist at Upwork, joins Mark Zandi and the Moody's Analytics team to discuss the recent job numbers and productivity.

Featured Speakers

Moody's Analytics HostAdam Ozimek GuestRyan Sweet Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Inside Economics hosts Mark Zandi, Ryan Sweet, Chris Drees, and guest Adam Ozimek dissect an unexpectedly weak April jobs report, arguing it likely reflects temporary labor-supply constraints rather than collapsing demand. They then pivot to a deep discussion of work-from-anywhere: its rapid adoption, productivity benefits, effects on wages, housing, regional economics, entrepreneurship, and climate, concluding it may be a durable structural shift.

Main Topics: April Jobs Report Surprise (Priority: 5/5): The panel reacts to April’s far weaker-than-expected payroll gain and debates whether the miss reflects labor shortages, temporary distortions, or sector-specific noise. Labor Supply Constraints and Temporary Frictions (Priority: 5/5): Ryan and Adam argue that enhanced unemployment benefits, childcare constraints, and sectoral churn are constraining labor supply, but that the effect should fade as benefits expire and schools reopen. Work from Anywhere Adoption and Measurement (Priority: 5/5): Adam explains how remote work is measured, why pre-pandemic and pandemic-era shares are hard to compare, and how he expects a lasting remote/hybrid equilibrium. Productivity, Management, and Firm Adaptation (Priority: 4/5): The discussion centers on whether remote work hurts or helps productivity; the guests emphasize evidence of positive productivity effects and the need for firms to adapt management practices. Wages, Housing, and Regional Redistribution (Priority: 4/5): The group explores how remote work affects wage setting across locations, housing demand shifts from cities to suburbs/exurbs, and city-specific outcomes like Philadelphia’s wage tax issue. Entrepreneurship, Business Formation, and Climate (Priority: 3/5): Adam links remote work to higher business formation, more freelancing, and lower commuting-related environmental costs, suggesting broader structural benefits beyond labor-market flexibility.

Key Arguments: The April payroll number was a major downside surprise, with 267,000 jobs versus consensus expectations far higher, but monthly labor data are noisy and can be revised. Labor-supply constraints—especially unemployment benefits and childcare problems—are increasingly binding, but are likely temporary and should ease by late summer/fall. Sector details make the jobs miss look less like a uniform supply problem and more like a mix of sectoral weakness, revision risk, and possible seasonal distortions. Remote work is likely to settle into a long-run equilibrium of roughly one-third of workers doing some amount of remote work, with about 20% fully remote and the rest hybrid/part-time remote. Remote work can raise productivity because firms and workers learn new workflows, and remote-first companies are likely to be the most effective long term. The productivity evidence is more credible when measured through manager reports and occupation-specific outcomes such as call centers, patents, and travel agents. Remote work may be mildly disinflationary through housing, commuting, and labor-market channels by weakening superstar-city clustering and reducing transportation costs. Wages in remote arrangements will likely be set by a mix of high-cost and low-cost labor markets, with outcomes depending on bargaining power, occupation liquidity, and whether the outside option is local or remote. Remote work appears to be encouraging entrepreneurship and freelance contracting, as reflected in strong business formation and platform growth. The social benefits of less commuting, more flexibility, and better work-life balance may outweigh the downsides for many workers, though not for all occupations.

Data Points: April payroll gain: 267,000 jobs - Nonfarm payroll employment increase in April, far below expectations. Bloomberg consensus range: 700,000 to 2.1 million jobs - Market expectations before the jobs report. Ryan Sweet’s forecast: 900,000 jobs - Ryan expected much stronger payroll growth. Unemployment benefit replacement rate: About half of unemployed workers get paid more not to work - Adam’s argument about labor-supply disincentives. Leisure and hospitality hours worked: 26.7 hours - Average workweek cited as a record high for the sector. Leisure and hospitality wages: About 5% above pre-pandemic levels - Used to support the argument that labor is tight in that sector. Work remotely in April (BLS): 18.3% - Share of workforce working remotely in the BLS survey. Work remotely at pandemic peak: North of 30%; Adam estimated around 60% - Peak remote-work share during the pandemic, depending on definition. Pre-pandemic remote-work share: 5% to 9% - Adam’s estimate based on how work-from-home is defined. Current remote-work share estimate: 25% to 30% - Adam’s estimate of today’s remote-work level. Long-run remote-work share estimate: About one-third total; around 20% full-time remote - Adam’s forecast for the eventual steady state. Business formation identifiers (EINs): Still high / strong growth - Census business formation data cited as evidence of entrepreneurship rising. Commute savings: About $2,000 per year per person - Adam’s earlier estimate of private cost savings from working from home. Vehicle sales in April: 18.5 million annualized units - Cited as the biggest April sales month on record and evidence of a booming economy.

Pivotal Quotes: "I think that we're going to get it right back on track next month. You know, we're going to get some big numbers next month." — Adam Ozimek: Adam argues the weak April jobs report is a temporary miss rather than a new trend. "I think the really positive response immediately surprised me." — Adam Ozimek: He describes how quickly firms adapted to remote work and how upbeat the survey evidence was. "It’s just one big meeting." — Ryan Sweet: Ryan jokes about the perceived meeting-heavy nature of Zoom-based work.

Implications: The labor market may be softer in the near term, but the bigger story is a lasting shift toward hybrid/remote work that could reshape wages, office demand, city economies, entrepreneurship, and productivity.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Inside Economics

Join Chief Economist Mark Zandi, Marisa DiNatale and Cristian deRitis as they discuss key indicators and other aspects of the global economy. Contact us at [email protected]. Visit online at www.economy.com/economicview

View all episodes from Inside Economics