This Week in Startups
This Week in Startups

E1039: Independent Journalist Vincent Woo reflects on his piece, “Lambda School’s Misleading Promises”, shares insights on what drew him to the story, where Lambda School went wrong, how they can be better & more

0:45 Jason intros Vincent Woo, who wrote "Lambda School's Misleading Promises" for New York Magazine 2:21 What drew Vincent to this story? What wrongdoings did he discover? 6:02 Vincent describes Lambda's ISAs and how they were sold 14:24 How Vincent approached Austen Allred as a

Featured Speakers

Jason Calacanis HostAustin Allred GuestVincent Wu Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: In this episode of This Week in Startups, host Jason Calacanis interviews investigative journalist Vincent Wu about his New York Magazine exposé on Lambda School. The discussion centers on allegations of fraud and misleading practices by Lambda School's CEO Austin Allred, including selling income-sharing agreements (ISAs) to hedge funds despite public claims to the contrary, inflated placement rates, and a disorganized curriculum. Wu argues that while the ISA model offers opportunities for underprivileged students, Lambda School's deceptive behavior undermines its mission. The conversation also explores the challenges of scaling remote education, the ethics of ISAs, and the broader implications for the coding bootcamp industry.

Main Topics: Allegations of Fraud and Misleading Practices (Priority: 5/5): Vincent Wu accuses Lambda School CEO Austin Allred of fraud, including lying about selling ISAs to hedge funds and misrepresenting placement rates. Wu presents evidence from internal documents and former employees. Income-Sharing Agreements (ISAs) and Their Implications (Priority: 4/5): The podcast examines the ISA model, where students pay a percentage of their salary after graduation. Wu and Calacanis debate the benefits and risks, including the potential for exploitation of vulnerable populations. Placement Rates and Educational Outcomes (Priority: 4/5): Discrepancies in Lambda School's reported placement rates (86% claimed vs. 50-60% from internal sources) are discussed, highlighting the lack of transparency and accountability. Remote vs. In-Person Education (Priority: 3/5): The effectiveness of Lambda School's fully remote model is questioned, with Wu arguing that in-person instruction provides better support and outcomes, though remote access expands reach. Founder Personality and Startup Culture (Priority: 3/5): Calacanis and Wu discuss how Austin Allred's narcissistic and contrarian traits may drive innovation but also lead to ethical blind spots, drawing parallels to other tech founders. Journalistic Integrity and Investigative Reporting (Priority: 2/5): Wu shares his process for the exposé, including sourcing, fact-checking, and legal review, emphasizing the importance of on-the-record sources and rigorous verification. Broader Issues in Education and White-Collar Crime (Priority: 2/5): The conversation touches on systemic problems in education, the difficulty of prosecuting white-collar crime, and the need for greater accountability in both sectors.

Key Arguments: Lambda School's CEO Austin Allred lied about selling ISAs to hedge funds, contradicting his public statements that the school never sold them. The school's placement rates are inflated; internal sources suggest rates around 50-60%, far below the publicly claimed 86%. The ISA model, while innovative, can exploit vulnerable students who forgo income and incur living costs, especially if the education is subpar. Remote education at scale lacks effective pedagogy, with students struggling to get one-on-one support, leading to poor outcomes. Founder narcissism and a 'mission-driven' mindset can justify unethical behavior, but such actions should not be excused even if the mission is noble. Investigative journalism serves as a crucial check on startup hype, forcing companies to clean up their practices.

Data Points: Lambda School tuition (ISA): $20,000 upfront or 15% of salary capped at $30,000 - Original cost structure for the nine-month program. Publicly claimed placement rate: 86% - Lambda School's reported placement rate before the exposé. Internal placement rate (former director): 50-60% - Sabrina, former director of student placement, estimated this for 71 students over six months. Student-to-teacher ratio: 40:1 - Approximate ratio at Lambda School, indicating limited individual attention. ISA sale price to hedge fund: $10,000 per student - Lambda School sold individual ISAs to a hedge fund for upfront cash. Program length: 9 months - Duration of Lambda School's full-time program.

Pivotal Quotes: "We have never ever sold ISAs... When we did sell ISAs, we would sell them either at the point where a student was hired or at graduation." — Austin Allred: Contradicting his earlier public statements during the interview with Vincent Wu. "I would say out of 71 students within the six months of them graduating, it was probably 50 to 60 percent placement rate." — Sabrina (former Lambda School director): On-the-record estimate of actual placement rates, far below Lambda's claims. "The nobility of your mission matters, but the nobility of your behavior arguably matters, at least to me, even more." — Vincent Wu: Emphasizing that ethical conduct is paramount, regardless of the mission's perceived goodness.

Implications: This exposé may lead to increased scrutiny of coding bootcamps and ISA models, potentially prompting regulatory changes. It highlights the need for transparency in placement rates and ethical conduct in edtech. For investors and students, it underscores the importance of due diligence and skepticism toward inflated claims.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About This Week in Startups

Jason Calacanis covers startups, tech, markets, media, and all the hottest topics in business and technology. He also interviews the world’s greatest founders, operators, investors, and innovators.

View all episodes from This Week in Startups