Science Vs
Science Vs

Election Special: Immigration

In the final installment of our election series, we tackle immigration: the #1 concern of Americans as they head to the polls. It's been a huge focus for President Trump... and people say immigrants are stealing jobs and driving up the crime rate. But what does the research say? There have been

Featured Speakers

Spotify Studios Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode examines immigration through economic and crime evidence, arguing that migrants generally strengthen the U.S. economy and do not raise crime rates overall. It highlights that immigrants often fill hard-to-staff jobs, can slightly lower wages for some low-skilled native-born workers, but typically create demand, jobs, tax revenue, and innovation, while research finds little to no crime increase and sometimes lower crime.

Main Topics: Immigration and the U.S. economy (Priority: 5/5): The episode weighs whether immigrants take jobs or instead fill labor shortages and stimulate economic activity through spending and entrepreneurship. Wage effects for native-born workers (Priority: 5/5): It explains that wage impacts are concentrated among low-skilled workers, especially high school dropouts, while the average effect on American wages is small. Labor shortages in agriculture (Priority: 4/5): Alabama and farm examples show immigrants often do physically demanding work that many Americans will not take, preventing crops from going unharvested. Taxes, public benefits, and long-term fiscal effects (Priority: 4/5): The episode contrasts short-term public costs with longer-term gains from immigrants and especially their American-born children. Immigration and crime (Priority: 5/5): It addresses the common belief that immigrants increase crime and summarizes evidence that most studies find no overall increase, and sometimes lower crime. Political rhetoric vs. evidence (Priority: 3/5): The episode compares anti-immigration political claims with scientific findings, showing a mismatch between public fear and research consensus.

Key Arguments: Immigrants do not generally take jobs from Americans; they often fill labor shortages in sectors like agriculture where native-born workers avoid the work. Some low-income native-born workers, especially those without a high school diploma, can experience modest wage competition from immigrants. The overall long-run effect of immigration on U.S. wages is very small, according to the National Academy of Sciences report. Immigrants create demand by spending money on goods and services, which generates additional jobs in local economies. Highly skilled immigrants disproportionately contribute to innovation and patents, boosting growth for everyone. Although immigrants can use public services in the short term, the American-born children of immigrants tend to earn more and pay more taxes over time. The best available research finds no meaningful overall increase in crime from immigration; in some cases crime falls slightly. Fear-driven anecdotes and political claims about immigrants often conflict with broader statistical evidence.

Data Points: Foreign-born share of U.S. population: More than 40 million people; over 1 in 8 Americans - Describes the scale of immigration in the U.S. Support for border wall extension: Around 35% of Americans - Pew survey finding referenced in the episode. Estimated immigrants leaving Alabama after law: Approximately 15,000 to more than 40,000 - Estimates of out-migration after Alabama's anti-immigration law. Farm workers in North Carolina study: 7 American workers out of more than 6,000 openings - Showed how few native-born workers took farm jobs. Farm labor gap in Georgia study: About 60% of needed workers filled - Survey after a similar immigration law affected labor supply. Immigrant share of men working on farms: 7.5% in 1990 to more than triple by 2012 - Shows rising reliance on immigrant labor in agriculture. Wage impact on low-income workers: Negative effect estimated from 9% to 0.7% - Range of study findings on low-skilled native-born wages. Overall long-run wage effect: Very small - National Academy of Sciences report conclusion. Crime effect in UK asylum-seeker case: 1.1% increase in property crime in a town of 10,000 with 100 asylum seekers - Small localized effect; not noticeable in practice. Immigrant group crime findings in recent studies: 5 out of 6 studies found no link to increased crime - Summary of newer research cited in the episode.

Pivotal Quotes: "Immigrants typically go for the jobs that we shun. So the only way you can have people fill those jobs is to bring them in." — Sam Addy: Explaining why immigrant labor is needed in agriculture. "In the US, there's really no evidence. Nobody thinks the employment rate is lowered by immigrants." — Jenny Hunt: Summarizing the consensus on immigration and employment. "Overall, the science tells us that immigrants make America more prosperous." — Wendy Zuckerman: Closing takeaway on the economic impact of immigration.

Implications: For listeners and policymakers, the evidence suggests immigration restrictions are unlikely to improve jobs or safety overall and may harm growth. Better policy would target specific labor-market frictions while recognizing immigrants' net economic contributions.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Science Vs

There are a lot of fads, blogs and strong opinions, but then there’s SCIENCE. Science Vs is the show from Spotify Studios that finds out what’s fact, what’s not, and what’s somewhere in between. We do the hard work of sifting through all the science so you don't have to and cover everything from 5G and ADHD, to Fluoride and Fasting Diets.

View all episodes from Science Vs