Pitchfork Economics
Pitchfork Economics

Health Care Part 1: Everyone does it better than us (with T. R. Reid)

When it comes to health care, every country in the world is running their own version of the same experiment—and the results vary widely in terms of cost and patient outcomes. In the first episode of a two-part exploration of health care, author T. R. Reid takes Nick and Stephanie on a tour of medic

Featured Speakers

Civic Ventures HostTR Reid Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode argues that U.S. health care is an economic and moral failure: it is far more expensive, more fragmented, and less effective than systems in other rich democracies. TR Reid explains four global models, why the U.S. mixes them inefficiently, and why expanding government-run coverage or Medicare-like options is the most plausible path to universal care. A personal London ER story underscores the simplicity and low friction of non-U.S. systems.

Main Topics: U.S. health care as an economic burden (Priority: 5/5): Health care is framed as one of the largest unavoidable costs for ordinary Americans, directly affecting wages, bankruptcy risk, and household stability. The hosts argue economics cannot be understood without health care reform. Four international health care models (Priority: 5/5): TR Reid outlines the main systems: British-style government-provided care, German-style private insurance with universal coverage, Canadian-style national health insurance, and the no-insurance model common in poor countries. Why the U.S. system costs more and performs worse (Priority: 5/5): The discussion emphasizes fragmentation, multiple payers, administrative overhead, narrow networks, and insurer incentives that raise costs while reducing access and quality. Insurance industry power and political influence (Priority: 4/5): The episode argues that insurers shape policy through lobbying, legislative influence, and legal provisions that protect administrative markups and deny claims, making reform difficult. Paths to reform: Medicare for all, public option, and state experiments (Priority: 4/5): Reid and the hosts discuss gradual expansion of Medicare, public buy-ins, and state-level experimentation as practical routes toward universal coverage in the U.S. Personal evidence from the UK health system (Priority: 4/5): Nick Hanauer recounts a family emergency in London that illustrated the efficiency of a system with minimal billing, paperwork, or front-end bureaucracy. Broader comparison with tax administration (Priority: 2/5): The conversation briefly shifts to Reid’s tax book to show that other countries also outperform the U.S. in simplicity and efficiency in taxation.

Key Arguments: The U.S. spends far more per person on health care than comparable countries while covering fewer people and achieving worse outcomes. Universal coverage is the central design principle behind better-performing health systems; countries that commit to covering everyone are more efficient and fairer. The British model works because government both provides and pays for care; the German model works because private insurers are tightly regulated and universal. The Canadian/Medicare model shows that government insurance can pay private providers efficiently, and this is already the model used by U.S. Medicare. American health care is artificially expensive because insurers add administrative costs, deny claims, and use narrow networks to control where patients can go. Private insurers have strong incentives to increase spending rather than reduce it, since their revenue often rises with higher bills. Medicare is popular because it is simpler and more trusted than private insurance, suggesting that broader public insurance could win public support. A universal government-backed system would likely reduce employer costs and could raise wages by shifting premium spending back into compensation. State-level public options or Medicare buy-ins may be politically easier than a single national leap and could demonstrate the benefits of reform. The U.S. already contains all four health care models domestically, which highlights how fragmented and incoherent the current system is.

Data Points: Americans dying from treatable diseases due to cost: About 22,000 per year - TR Reid cites the National Academy of Sciences to argue that lack of affordable care causes preventable deaths. Annual bankruptcy filings related to health care: About 700,000 annually - Used to show the financial damage of U.S. medical costs. Uninsured Americans: About 32 million - Current estimate cited in the conversation as worse than two years earlier. 2017 U.S. health spending per person: $10,200 per citizen - Compared with peer nations to show the system’s high cost. Comparable country average spending per person: $5,300 per citizen - Average for other rich countries discussed by Reid. Canada per-capita spending: About $4,800 per person - Given as an example of a lower-cost peer system. Britain per-capita spending relative to U.S.: About 44% as much per capita - Reid describes Britain as covering everyone at less than half the U.S. cost. Germany per-capita spending relative to U.S.: About 62% as much per capita - Used to illustrate efficiency in a private-insurance universal model. Obamacare coverage gains: About 20–21 million people gained coverage - The ACA expanded insurance, though gains have since eroded. U.S. private insurer administrative costs: 20% allowed to be added to doctor bills - Reid says the ACA codified this markup under insurer lobbying pressure. German private insurer administrative costs: 5.5% maximum - Presented as a much lower administrative overhead than in the U.S. Medicare administrative costs: 2.8% - Used as proof that public insurance can operate more efficiently. Denied medical claims in the U.S.: About 30% denied at least the first time - Contrasted with Germany’s requirement to pay approved claims promptly. Employer health premiums growth: About five times the rate of inflation - Describes the pressure on businesses over the prior six years. Potential wage increase if employers stopped paying premiums: 10% to 15% - Estimate offered to show how universal coverage could shift compensation into wages. Colorado ballot campaign funding against public plan: $8 million spent by insurance companies - Cited as a reason the state-run health plan failed. Tax-filing time in the U.S.: 18 to 20 hours - Reid compares U.S. tax complexity to foreign systems. Tax-filing cost in the U.S.: About $260 - Median-income family cost to have a return prepared. Tax-filing time in the Netherlands: 15 minutes and $0 - Example of simpler government-prepared returns. Tax-filing time in Britain and Japan: One minute - Reid says governments send pre-filled returns for approval.

Pivotal Quotes: "I have this radical notion that if one of my neighbors is sick or living in pain, we ought to provide them health care." — Nick Hanauer: Opening statement framing health care as a moral obligation in the richest country in the world. "The other countries all do better because they all agreed that everybody ought to be covered, and everybody ought to be covered in a single model." — TR Reid: Core thesis explaining why universal systems outperform the fragmented U.S. model. "What's un-American is to pay twice as much as France and get less." — TR Reid: Reid responds to claims that universal health care is un-American or socialist.

Implications: Listeners are left with a clear reform frame: universal coverage is not only morally preferable but cheaper and more efficient. The likely U.S. path is incremental expansion of public options/Medicare rather than reliance on private insurers.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Pitchfork Economics

We are living through a paradigm shift from trickle-down neoliberalism to middle-out economics — a new understanding of who gets what and why. Join zillionaire class-traitor Nick Hanauer and some of the world’s leading economic and political thinkers as they explore the latest thinking on how the economy actually works.

View all episodes from Pitchfork Economics