Pitchfork Economics
Pitchfork Economics

How Outsized Corporate Profits Raised Prices (with Lindsay Owens)

This week, Nick and Goldy are joined by Lindsay Owens, Executive Director of the Groundwork Collaborative, to discuss Groundwork’s recent reports on corporate profiteering and price gouging during and after the pandemic. Owens attributes the record increases in corporate profits in the last few year

Featured Speakers

Civic Ventures HostLindsay Owens Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode argues that recent high prices are driven less by classic inflation than by corporate profiteering enabled by supply shocks, concentrated market power, and weak competition. Guest Lindsay Owens says firms used pandemic disruptions to raise and keep prices above costs, producing record profit margins. The discussion centers on antitrust enforcement, corporate taxes, anti-gouging rules, and fairer pricing practices.

Main Topics: Corporate profiteering versus inflation (Priority: 5/5): The hosts distinguish normal inflation from companies using the pandemic as cover to raise prices beyond cost increases, keeping margins elevated even after supply chains improved. Market concentration and pricing power (Priority: 5/5): Owens and Hanauer argue decades of mergers and weak antitrust enforcement created dominant firms with the power to set prices and limit competition across many sectors. Record profit margins and corporate behavior (Priority: 5/5): The conversation emphasizes that profits rose not just because firms sold more, but because they expanded profit margins to historic highs while costs were rising and later falling. Policy responses: antitrust, taxes, and buffer stocks (Priority: 4/5): Proposed solutions include stronger merger scrutiny, breaking up concentrated firms, restoring higher corporate taxes or windfall taxes, and building resilient supply chains with reserves of key goods. Price gouging and crisis exploitation (Priority: 4/5): The episode highlights legal and moral concerns about firms exploiting crises through excessive markups, especially during emergencies or periods of economic disruption. Deceptive and personalized pricing (Priority: 4/5): The discussion broadens to junk fees, shrinkflation, skimflation, surveillance pricing, and personalized pricing as practices that undermine fair, transparent pricing.

Key Arguments: High prices in the post-pandemic period were amplified by firms raising margins beyond what was needed to cover rising costs. Corporate concentration gave firms durable pricing power, making competitive discipline too weak to force prices back down. Companies used legitimate supply shocks as cover to test how much consumers would tolerate, then kept prices high after input costs fell. Profit margins, not just prices, matter because they show firms are extracting more value per unit sold. Stronger antitrust enforcement and blocking mergers are necessary to restore competition and lower prices over time. Higher corporate taxes can reduce the incentive to exploit crisis-driven pricing because firms keep less of the gains. Price-gouging rules should extend beyond disasters to economic crises and inflationary periods. Fair pricing requires action against junk fees, shrinkflation, skimflation, and personalized/surveillance pricing.

Data Points: Non-financial corporate profits: Highest ever recorded at the end of 2023 - Used to show the scale of record profit-taking during and after the inflationary period Corporate profit margins: 70-year record highs - Cited by Owens as evidence that firms expanded margins beyond normal levels Corporate profits as a share of GDP: About 5-6% in the 1960s-1980s; around 12% by 2013 - Presented to illustrate the long-term rise in profit share of the economy Corporate profits as a share of GDP: Rose from about 11% to 12% before/after the pandemic - Used to show a meaningful jump despite already-high profits Diaper market concentration: 70%-80% - P&G and Kimberly-Clark control most of the diaper market Corporate tax rate: Reduced from 34% to 21% - Mentioned as a reason overcharging became more lucrative State price-gouging laws: More than 30 states - Used to show that anti-gouging policy already exists in many jurisdictions Inflation target: 2% - Referenced as the Fed’s target level that would be closer if higher margins were excluded Junk fees: 5, 10, even up to 15 fees - Describes how many extra charges can appear at checkout before purchase completion

Pivotal Quotes: "It's time to build our economy from the bottom up and from the middle out, not the top down." — Intro/Nick Hanauer: Sets the episode’s political and economic framing "What we're seeing here is companies making record levels of profit per glass of lemonade." — Lindsay Owens: Explains that margin expansion, not just higher costs, is driving prices "The real key to understanding this problem is they finally got opportunity." — Lindsay Owens: Summarizes how pandemic supply shocks created the opening for price hikes

Implications: The episode argues consumers and policymakers should focus on market power, not just prices. If competition, tax, and anti-gouging reforms advance, inflationary profiteering should be harder to repeat and pricing may become fairer and more transparent.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Pitchfork Economics

We are living through a paradigm shift from trickle-down neoliberalism to middle-out economics — a new understanding of who gets what and why. Join zillionaire class-traitor Nick Hanauer and some of the world’s leading economic and political thinkers as they explore the latest thinking on how the economy actually works.

View all episodes from Pitchfork Economics