This Week in Startups
This Week in Startups

How to secure follow-on investment for your startup (FounderU) + Ask an Angel with Zach Coelius | E1264

Jason discusses how founders can secure follow on funding (1:57), then is joined by investor Zach Coelius to answer listener questions on technical co-founders (38:21), successful founder traits (40:41), founder red flags (46:07), why startups fail diligence (56:17) and more.

Featured Speakers

Jason Calacanis HostJason Calacanis Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Jason Calacanis explains how founders can secure follow-on capital and why investors weigh a bridge against other opportunities. He covers pro rata rights, bridges, extensions, preemptive rounds, milestone-based funding, and distressed recaps, then discusses founder execution, technical teams, investor diligence, and regulatory risks to crypto. The episode also introduces an expanded Founder University program.

Main Topics: Follow-on financing and investor incentives: The discussion distinguishes follow-on rounds, bridges, extensions, and preemptive inside rounds. Investors allocate limited capital among struggling companies, high performers, and new bets, so founders need to understand investor policies and present a credible case. Runway, pro rata, and bridge structures: Calacanis defines runway and pro rata, explains how investors maintain ownership in later rounds, and describes bridge terms, extensions, warrants, pay-to-play recaps, and milestone-based tranches. He recommends seeking a properly led Series A or B rather than relying on a weak-looking bridge. How founders can improve bridge prospects: Founders should provide regular, candid updates, explain missed targets and corrective plans, and make a specific, milestone-linked ask. They may distribute a small bridge across existing investors, cut costs or seek break-even, or offer warrants; a recap is a last resort that can damage investor relationships. Founder capabilities and operating discipline: The speakers stress building a strong product and team, delighting customers, recruiting effectively, and executing with urgency. They identify slow product velocity, neglecting customer acquisition, and focusing on governance before product-market fit as warning signs. Technical co-founders and startup diligence: Zach Coleus argues that technology should generally be built in-house early so teams retain knowledge and can iterate quickly, while no-code tools may help validate an MVP. Diligence red flags include inconsistent claims, poor accounting, unresolved legal issues, and problematic cap tables or IP and vesting arrangements. Crypto regulation and Founder University: Coleus offers a speculative warning that government-issued digital currencies and regulation could constrain decentralized crypto. Separately, Calacanis outlines plans for a longer Founder University course to help aspiring and underrepresented founders build an MVP and prepare for accelerators or angel funding.

Key Arguments: Investors seek a small number of exceptional, potentially 100x-plus outcomes, while founders need enough runway to reach product-market fit; every month of burn reduces the time available. A bridge is not automatically attractive: an investor must believe the added capital can produce a meaningful milestone and must compare that use against other portfolio companies or new investments. A priced follow-on round led by new investors is stronger evidence of progress than an insider bridge because new money sets a valuation after conducting diligence. Founders increase their chances of insider support through transparent monthly updates, a clear explanation of setbacks, a credible plan, and asks tied to measurable milestones; tranches can limit risk for both sides. Founders should not use a recap to shift ownership selfishly. A coercive pay-to-play or unfair insider transaction can destroy trust and may create legal exposure. Early companies need product and recruiting ability, customer delight, and fast execution. Founders who delay learning acquisition channels or obsess over premature governance issues may be unprepared for later growth. Investors should verify that company claims, revenue, accounts, legal documents, IP assignments, vesting, and the cap table are sound; inability to provide basic diligence materials is itself a warning.

Data Points: Potential investor return target: 100x, 200x, or 500x - Calacanis describes the outsized returns early-stage investors seek from a small portion of their portfolio. Illustrative company burn: 10 employees at about $8,000–$9,000 per month each; roughly $100,000 monthly or $1 million yearly - An example used to explain how payroll and operating costs consume runway. Pro rata example: A 1% investor contributes about $10,000 to a $1 million round to maintain 1% - Illustrates maintaining ownership when a company raises new capital. Bridge-to-Series-B revenue example: $1 million to $4 million annual revenue target; company has reached $2.5 million - Hypothetical example of asking current investors for a bridge before a Series B. Bridge participation threshold cited by Calacanis: Double-digit month-over-month growth for the prior six months - A condition his firm says it uses when considering bridges or extensions. Example of an inside preemptive round: 20% monthly growth for six months; revenue pace rising from $300,000 to $1.4 million - Illustrates when investors might proactively offer new capital to a fast-growing portfolio company. Example of a diversified seed portfolio: 20–50 companies; around $50,000 per investor in a $1 million seed round - Describes a party-style seed round and why investors often reserve capital for many bets. Example of bridge sweetener: Three warrants per share purchased, with a five-to-ten-year exercise window - An illustrative incentive for investors considering a bridge; the transcript also mentions other warrant ratios. Founder University course plan: 12–16 weeks; initially about 50 participants; potentially four or five cohorts per year - Proposed longer program aimed at preparing early founders for accelerators or angel funding. Crypto marketing statistic: Over 78% - An ad read claims this share of B2B marketers rate LinkedIn as the most effective social platform; it is promotional, not central to the discussion.

Pivotal Quotes: "Is this a bridge or a dock?" — Jason Calacanis: A shorthand for asking whether additional capital can genuinely get a company to its next milestone or merely prolong a failing business. "If you can't build a great product, well, back to that Baker analogy with the previous question, it's kind of like, Well, who are you?" — Jason Calacanis: In the discussion of founder qualities and outsourced development, he argues founders need a meaningful ability to create product and recruit a team. "Speed is success, and going slow equals death." — Jason Calacanis: His forceful summary of the urgency and execution discipline he believes startups require.

Implications: Founders should treat fundraising as a capital-allocation decision: preserve runway, communicate early, prove progress, and tie asks to milestones. Investors should enforce diligence and ownership discipline. Startup teams need product-building, recruiting, and acquisition skills early; crypto regulation remains uncertain and the episode's forecast is opinion.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About This Week in Startups

Jason Calacanis covers startups, tech, markets, media, and all the hottest topics in business and technology. He also interviews the world’s greatest founders, operators, investors, and innovators.

View all episodes from This Week in Startups