Monetary Matters
Monetary Matters

Is It Enough? Michael Howell on Money Market Turbulence, Standing Repo Facility, and Why Fed Balance Sheet Expansion Is Inevitable

Monetary Matters listeners can get 20% discounted access to an annual subscription of Michael Howell’s Capital Wars here: https://capitalwars.substack.com/MonetaryMatters With the Federal Reserve announcing the end of Quantitative Tightening (QT) on December 1st, Jack welcomes Michael Howell of GL I

Featured Speakers

Jack Farley HostMichael Howell Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Michael Howell argues the Fed’s end to QT and hints of Treasury bill purchases are a meaningful but insufficient response to deteriorating money-market liquidity. He sees repo stress, shrinking reserves, and rising debt-refinancing needs as signs of a late-cycle regime shift toward more monetization, some of it moving from Fed to Treasury channels, which may help the real economy more than risky assets.

Main Topics: Fed ends QT and hints at balance-sheet expansion (Priority: 5/5): Howell says the Fed’s December 1 stop to balance-sheet runoff is a major qualitative pivot, and that officials have signaled possible monthly Treasury purchases next year. Repo market strains and reserve shortages (Priority: 5/5): He links recent SOFR/Fed funds spikes to depleted reserves caused by a rebuilt Treasury General Account and weak system liquidity, arguing the Fed was forced to respond. Why this is 'not QE QE' (Priority: 4/5): The discussion debates whether buying Treasury bills counts as QE. Howell says it is liquidity creation and maturity transformation, even if the Fed avoids the label. Adequate reserves and why the Fed may still be too small (Priority: 5/5): Howell argues the Fed’s reserve target is too low versus market-based estimates, leaving repo stress unresolved even after modest QE-like purchases. Debt refinancing, monetization, and inflation risk (Priority: 5/5): He frames modern markets as debt-refinancing systems and warns that bill-heavy deficit financing plus bank purchases amounts to monetization that eventually lifts inflation. Global liquidity cycle is peaking in momentum, not necessarily level (Priority: 4/5): Howell distinguishes between liquidity levels and growth rates, saying liquidity is still rising but the rate of change is rolling over, which is what matters for assets. China and cross-border liquidity are also cooling (Priority: 3/5): He adds that China had been a major liquidity engine this year but recent PBOC injections appear to be slowing, which could reinforce a broader global liquidity inflection.

Key Arguments: The Fed’s QT halt was inevitable because repo market stress showed genuine liquidity shortages; the timing was sudden, but the direction was not surprising. Buying Treasury bills is effectively a form of QE by Howell’s definition because it increases reserves and adds liquidity, even if it is not credit QE like agency MBS or crisis-era asset purchases. A $20 billion/month Treasury-buying pace is meaningful but likely insufficient; Howell says markets may need roughly $400–500 billion of support next year, while the Fed appears to be offering about half that. Reserve adequacy should be judged against market stress, not just the Fed’s GDP-based framework; Howell’s market-based estimate is around $3.3 trillion, above the Fed’s roughly $2.7 trillion figure. The Treasury General Account rebuild to near $1 trillion has drained liquidity from markets and helped trigger repo spikes and collateral stress. Because financial markets are now driven more by debt refinancing than new capital formation, liquidity shortages quickly show up in repo and collateral markets. If bill issuance is funded increasingly by banks and the Fed, that is monetization of the deficit, which may accelerate broad money growth and eventually inflation. The shift from Fed QE to Treasury QE may support the real economy more than equity valuations, so stocks could become range-bound even if liquidity is being added. The global liquidity cycle is likely nearing a peak in momentum around late 2025/early 2026, so the Fed’s pivot may slow but not reverse a broader downcycle. China’s recent liquidity injections may be waning, removing another support for global liquidity and reinforcing caution on risk assets.

Data Points: QT end date: December 1 - Fed announced it will stop reducing its balance sheet starting December 1. Potential monthly Treasury purchases: About $20 billion per month - Howell says Fed officials hinted at buying Treasuries to add liquidity. Annualized balance-sheet expansion: About $250 billion per year - He frames $20 billion monthly as roughly a quarter-trillion annual pace. Treasury General Account: Testing $1 trillion - Howell says the rebuilt TGA has withdrawn liquidity from markets. Adequate reserve estimate: About $3.3 trillion - Howell’s market-based estimate for minimum reserves needed to avoid repo stress. Fed reserve estimate: About $2.7 trillion - Howell says the Fed’s own target is lower than his estimate. Projected reserve shortfall: Roughly $250 billion - Even after assumed TGA drawdown and Treasury bill purchases, Howell says reserves remain below adequate levels. Expected market liquidity need in 2026: $400–500 billion - Howell says markets may need this scale of support next year. Cash and circulation drain: $120–130 billion - He says stronger economic activity could pull this amount out of Fed liquidity. Broad money growth in US in 2026: Near 8% - Howell warns monetization could push money growth above a 2% inflation-consistent pace. Potential conventional monetary growth: Well in excess of 8%, maybe nearer 10% - He applies this to a $2 trillion deficit with heavy bill financing. Repo spread danger zone: About 10 basis points over normal - Howell identifies this as the threshold where repo stress becomes concerning. SOFR stress spike: 25–30 basis points above normal - He cites late October/early November repo dislocations. Standing Repo Facility usage: About $30 billion on October 31 - Howell notes month-end take-up as evidence of stress and seasonal pressure. Collateralized lending share: 77% - He cites a World Bank figure for the share of global lending backed by collateral. Average liquidity cycle length: About 65 months - He says the current global liquidity cycle is approaching its typical endpoint. Historical cycle range: 1970 to 2025 - Used for his average cycle-length comparison. Trade fails: About 200 billion weekly basis (in his framework) - He links reserve shortfall to rising trade fails among primary dealers. Global repo market growth: About $1 trillion a year - Howell says repo markets are now central to global financing. PBOC liquidity injections: Notable pickup through 2025, then drop over last four weeks - He says China had been a liquidity engine but may be cooling recently.

Pivotal Quotes: "QT is over." — Jay Powell (as cited by Michael Howell): Howell says Powell effectively signaled the end of QT before the FOMC announcement. "not QE QE" — Michael Howell: His shorthand for the Fed’s Treasury-bill purchases: liquidity injection without the traditional QE label. "modern financial systems are debt refinancing systems" — Michael Howell: He uses this to explain why liquidity shortages show up first in repo and collateral markets.

Implications: The Fed’s pivot may calm funding markets, but it likely won’t fully restore liquidity. Expect continued repo sensitivity, late-cycle volatility, and a stronger case for caution on equities while inflation and deficit monetization risks build.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Monetary Matters

Jack Farley interviews the very best financial minds about macro, markets, and monetary matters. Follow Jack on Twitter @JackFarley96.

View all episodes from Monetary Matters