Macro Voices
Macro Voices

MacroVoices #505 Michael Every: Does Anyone Remember PMIs?

MacroVoices Erik Townsend & Patrick Ceresna welcome, Michael Every. They’ll discuss the geopolitical situation and talk about what it means for markets. https://bit.ly/49AFRuQ 🔻Download Big Picture Trading Chartbook 📈📉: https://bit.ly/4973pY2 ✅Sign up for a FREE 14-day trial at Big Picture Tradi

Featured Speakers

Hedge Fund Manager Erik Townsend ([email protected]) Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Macro Voices centers on Michael Every’s thesis that global markets are being reshaped by geopolitical and geoeconomic statecraft, not traditional macro data. He argues the U.S.-China rivalry is pushing the world toward bloc formation, capital controls, industrial policy, and financial tools like stablecoins. The post-game links this framework to positioning in equities, FX, commodities, uranium, and a relative-value short of Korean tech versus Nasdaq.

Main Topics: U.S.-China geoeconomic rivalry and bloc formation (Priority: 5/5): Every argues the world is moving toward a long-lasting contest between a U.S.-centric and China-centric system, with trade, industrial policy, and security increasingly intertwined. Economic statecraft replacing market-led globalization (Priority: 5/5): Tariffs, subsidies, export controls, FDI screening, capital controls, and currency tools are becoming standard instruments of policy on both sides. Stablecoins and the dollar’s strategic role (Priority: 4/5): Dollar stablecoins are framed as geopolitical infrastructure that could reinforce U.S. financial dominance and help reindustrialization efforts. Military and commodity chokepoints (Priority: 5/5): The discussion emphasizes rare earths, energy flows, shipping, chips, and industrial inputs as strategic leverage points in a de facto economic war. Market implications: AI, inflation, and sector rotation (Priority: 4/5): AI is portrayed as simultaneously inflationary and deflationary; markets may stay buoyant near term, but secular inflation and policy intervention could alter leadership. Trade of the week: short Korea vs long Nasdaq (Priority: 4/5): Patrick recommends a relative-value trade fading the narrow, AI-driven Korean tech rally versus more diversified U.S. tech exposure. Technical backdrop across major assets (Priority: 3/5): The post-game reviews SPX, DXY, oil, gold, uranium, and Treasuries with a cautious-to-bullish near-term bias in equities and a watchful stance on rates and commodities.

Key Arguments: The U.S. and China are in a strategic competition that is likely to persist for the rest of investors’ lives, not a temporary aberration. The current period is better described as a ceasefire to rearm than a genuine peace or durable G2 arrangement. Globalization has shifted from free-market efficiency toward state-directed security, resilience, and bloc alignment. The U.S. cannot simply “talk tough” without first rebuilding industrial and resource vulnerabilities; it is simultaneously trying to reshape allies, China, and its own economy. China’s leverage comes from rare earths, manufacturing depth, and export dependence; the U.S. leverage comes from financial dominance, high-end chips/software, and alliance structure. Capital controls are likely to expand, including controls over outward capital flows and directed foreign investment into the U.S. Dollar stablecoins may become a key geopolitical tool to reinforce the dollar system and channel capital into U.S.-aligned priorities. Markets will increasingly reflect policy goals rather than pure price discovery, creating a more segmented, ‘safari park’ environment. AI is both inflationary (power demand, capex, scarcity) and deflationary (labor displacement, potential concentration of profits, asset-price disruption). Korea’s tech rally is seen as too narrow and too dependent on memory chips and geopolitically exposed supply chains, making it vulnerable relative to Nasdaq.

Data Points: SP 500: 6796 - Down 136 bps week over week, consolidating off recent highs. U.S. Dollar Index (DXY): 99.92 - Up 80 bps and testing the 100 level. WTI crude (Dec): 59.60 - Down 146 bps; near the $60 area. RBOB gasoline (Dec): 194 - Up 265 bps week over week. Gold (Dec): 39.92 - Down 20 bps; noted as holding above its 50-day moving average. Copper (Dec): 498 - Down 532 bps. Uranium: 7875 - Down 296 bps. U.S. 10-year Treasury yield: 4.13% - Up 5 bps. EWY ETF performance since April lows: up more than 100% - Patrick cites the Korean equity rally from Liberation Day lows. Nasdaq 100 performance since April lows: roughly 50% - Used as the comparator in the long U.S. tech / short Korea trade. Korean implied volatility: 44% - Patrick says EWY implied vol has doubled over two months from 22%. Korean implied volatility prior level: 22% - Referenced as the earlier volatility level for EWY. QQQ implied volatility: around 20% - Used to contrast with the higher volatility in Korea. Gold prior move: $1,000 rise - Eric references the prior run from $3,400 to $4,400 after a similar technical setup. Gold prior range: $3,400 to $4,400 - Used to illustrate the previous measured move in the gold bull market. Breadth: about 40% of stocks above their 50-day moving average - Eric and Patrick highlight weak internal market participation. U.S. market concentration: Mag-7 dominance - Used to describe reliance on a few mega-cap tech names. AI and valuation comparison: NVIDIA market cap exceeds Germany GDP; Microsoft exceeds France GDP - Eric uses this to illustrate the scale of AI enthusiasm. Crude technical level: $62 - Patrick identifies this as a key upside breakout level for WTI. SPX downside trigger: below 6700 / below 6600 - Eric highlights these levels as key risk zones for systematic deleveraging.

Pivotal Quotes: "I think what we have here is a ceasefire to rearm, if you will, quite literally." — Michael Every: Describing the Trump-Xi outcome and broader U.S.-China strategic posture. "Markets will be moving from a world where they can do whatever they want... to a safari park." — Michael Every: Explaining his view that policy will increasingly corral capital and trade within designated lanes. "These dollar stablecoins are... entirely geopolitical." — Michael Every: Arguing stablecoins are infrastructure for a redesigned dollar-centered financial order.

Implications: Investors should expect more policy-driven markets, tighter capital flows, and greater bloc segmentation. Near term, AI and U.S. tech can still lead, but relative-value opportunities, commodity bifurcation, and geopolitical shocks may dominate returns.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Macro Voices

Weekly market commentary by Hedge Fund Manager Erik Townsend and interviews with the brightest minds in the world of finance and macroeconomics. Made possible by funding from Fourth Turning Capital Management, LLC

View all episodes from Macro Voices