Monetary Matters
Monetary Matters

Michael Howell: Markets On “Nervous Knife-Edge Equilibrium" As Global Liquidity Momentum Has Peaked

Learn more about the Fundrise Income Fund here: https://Fundrise.com/mm In this episode, Michael Howell of Capital Wars and Global Liquidity Indexes discusses why the global liquidity cycle has peaked and is beginning to slow down in early 2026. This shift suggests that investors should pivot toward

Featured Speakers

Jack Farley HostMichael Howell Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Michael Howell argues the global liquidity cycle has peaked and is now slowing, which should pressure risk assets and favor commodities, cash, and eventually government bonds. He says Fed liquidity is likely to flatline, balance-sheet shrinkage is unrealistic, and China—not a broad “debasement trade”—is the main driver of gold’s surge. He expects China to remain a relative bull market while U.S. equities and Bitcoin face headwinds.

Main Topics: Global liquidity cycle peaking (Priority: 5/5): Howell says the rate of change in global liquidity has turned down after a multi-year bull phase, creating a more defensive market backdrop and raising volatility risk for risk assets. Fed balance sheet, reserves, and repo fragility (Priority: 5/5): He argues that Fed balance-sheet shrinkage is constrained by banking-system reserve needs, repo-market stability, and the scale of Treasury-market intermediation. Asset-allocation rotation across cycle phases (Priority: 5/5): He maps liquidity phases to investment positioning: equities in rebound/calm, commodities near the peak, cash as liquidity turns down, and long-duration government bonds in turbulence. China as the key marginal driver of gold and commodities (Priority: 5/5): Howell rejects the broad ‘debasement trade’ narrative and says China’s liquidity expansion, capital controls, and gold accumulation are the main forces behind gold’s rise. Yield curve, term premium, and bond outlook (Priority: 4/5): He expects term premium to roll over and the yield curve to flatten, challenging consensus steepener trades and implying a more constructive view on duration later in the cycle. Bitcoin as a liquidity barometer (Priority: 4/5): Bitcoin is presented as the most liquidity-sensitive asset, with recent weakness interpreted as an early warning sign of broader financial-market stress. Treasury issuance, AI capex, and Main Street vs Wall Street (Priority: 4/5): He says shorter-duration Treasury issuance and heavy AI/capital spending shift liquidity from financial markets into the real economy, supporting growth but not necessarily equity multiples.

Key Arguments: Global liquidity is defined by momentum, not level; a slowdown in the rate of change is what matters for asset pricing. The Fed balance sheet headline is misleading; only liquidity-creating components matter, and those are likely to flatline rather than expand materially. Attempts to slash reserves would likely destabilize repo markets because post-GFC regulation made Fed reserves central to bank liquidity management. Gold’s rally is not mainly about broad currency debasement; it is largely driven by Chinese policy, capital controls, and gold demand. China is easing while the West is slowing, making China the most plausible ongoing bull market in geographic/sector terms. Cycle positioning matters more than valuation multiples: late-cycle leadership shifts toward commodities, energy, utilities, and staples, while tech loses leadership. A stronger real economy can be bearish for financial assets because it absorbs liquidity into working capital and capex rather than leaving it in markets. Bitcoin’s decline is consistent with tightening liquidity conditions and can be used as a leading indicator for broader risk appetite. The yield curve should flatten if liquidity rolls over, contradicting consensus expectations for persistent steepening. Treasury issuance at shorter maturities and private-sector borrowing for AI/data-center capex support Main Street but drain Wall Street liquidity.

Data Points: Global liquidity aggregate size: about $190 trillion - Howell described the scale of his global liquidity framework. Global liquidity cycle length: about 65 months - He said the liquidity cycle averages roughly five to six years. Fed reserve threshold: about $3 trillion - He estimated the minimum reserve level needed for banking-system stability. Fed reserve threshold in Q3: about $3.25 trillion - He said the floor was previously nearer this level before adjustments. Fed reserve management purchases: about $40 billion per month - He described recent Fed reserve liquidity support after repo stress. Primary dealer capacity since GFC: roughly halved - He said dealer balance-sheet capacity fell even as Treasury market size expanded sharply. Treasury market size growth since GFC: about five-fold - He used this to argue the Fed needs a larger footprint. Central banks easing: about 80% of central banks - He said roughly 80% of the ~100 central banks covered were easing. Current US and Europe risk-on split: 50/50 - He said markets were roughly evenly split between risk-on and risk-off states, with momentum rolling over. Chinese liquidity injections over 12 months: about $1.1–1.2 trillion - He cited PBOC liquidity support over the prior year. Expected additional Chinese stimulus: at least another $1 trillion equivalent - He projected more PBOC easing ahead. Shangai stock market performance: up 25–30% over 12 months - He cited this as evidence of China’s rebound phase. US real GDP growth: around 4.5% annualized through March quarter - He said the U.S. economy was growing strongly despite market caution. US liquidity lead time: about 9 months - He said liquidity typically leads asset and yield-curve effects by around nine months. Bitcoin liquidity sensitivity: about 40–45% of price variation - He said liquidity is the biggest systematic influence on Bitcoin. Bitcoin trend reference level: high $60,000s - He said Bitcoin was around one standard deviation below trend near that level. Gold price in yuan: over 30,000 yuan - He noted the yuan-denominated gold price had surged to this area. Gold price in dollars: over $5,000 - He referenced the dollar gold price rising sharply. China liquidity vs U.S. liquidity divergence: diverged notably after about 2012 - He said the two cycles tracked closely earlier, then decoupled. Japanese debt-liquidity ratio impact: fell materially under Abenomics - He used Japan as the precedent for China’s current policy path. Fed liquidity support under Treasury/Fed actions: roughly flatlining target - He said the best case is little net change in Fed liquidity this year. World debt refinancing need by 2030: $45 trillion - He cited the gross debt maturity wall needing refinancing.

Pivotal Quotes: "What we're seeing is a sort of a peak in the global liquidity cycle." — Michael Howell: He summarized the central market thesis at the start of the interview. "I just think that's wrong. Gold is being explained by a very specific factor, which is what the Chinese are doing." — Michael Howell: He rejected the broad debasement narrative as the explanation for gold’s surge. "Money that's anywhere must be somewhere." — Michael Howell: He used this phrase to explain why liquidity flowing into the real economy reduces market liquidity.

Implications: Listeners should expect a more defensive market regime: less upside for U.S. risk assets, stronger relative prospects for China and commodities, continued gold strength, and a likely rotation toward cash, staples, utilities, and duration. Liquidity—not headline rates—remains the key variable.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Monetary Matters

Jack Farley interviews the very best financial minds about macro, markets, and monetary matters. Follow Jack on Twitter @JackFarley96.

View all episodes from Monetary Matters