This Week in Startups
This Week in Startups

Negotiating a Term Sheet: Deal killers, what terms are worth fighting for & more with Becki DeGraw | Wilson Sonsini Startup Legal Basics

Check out Wilson Sonsini: https://wsgr.com FOLLOW Wilson Sonsini: https://twitter.com/wilsonsonsini FOLLOW Jason: https://linktr.ee/calacanis

Featured Speakers

Jason Calacanis HostJason Calacanis GuestBecky DeGras Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode explains how startup term sheets work, why they matter, and how founders should evaluate them before lawyers draft full financing documents. Jason Calacanis and Becky DeGras stress that term sheets are a serious commitment, diligence can uncover deal-breaking issues, and founders should focus on understanding economics, control terms, and board structure early to avoid costly mistakes later.

Main Topics: What a term sheet is (Priority: 5/5): A term sheet is the investor’s concise proposal of the main investment terms, including valuation, amount invested, rights requested, and governance items. It serves as the first real commitment point before legal drafting. Reputation and seriousness of signed term sheets (Priority: 5/5): Both speakers emphasize that once a term sheet is signed, backing out without a strong reason damages investor reputation and can hurt future access to deals because founders and investors talk. Business diligence vs. legal diligence (Priority: 5/5): Business diligence evaluates the product, market, customers, and traction; legal diligence follows and can expose IP, litigation, or other legal risks. Serious undisclosed issues may justify walking away. What founders should negotiate (Priority: 5/5): Founders should focus on understanding the true economics of valuation, option pool effects, SAFEs/notes, and whether terms are pre-money or post-money, rather than only chasing the highest headline valuation. Governance and board structure (Priority: 4/5): The discussion covers why boards and governance matter for corporate hygiene and avoiding future disputes, with a preference for simple, odd-numbered boards early on and independent directors later. Importance of legal help and cap table modeling (Priority: 4/5): Using lawyers early and building a pro forma cap table helps founders understand dilution and avoid expensive mistakes. Small legal spend now can prevent much larger losses later.

Key Arguments: A term sheet is where an investment becomes real; it should settle the core deal terms before full legal documents are prepared. Signed term sheets are treated as sacrosanct in venture; investors who routinely pull them back risk reputational damage. Most term sheet breakups happen only when diligence reveals major new information, such as a serious lawsuit or IP problem, not minor cleanup issues. Founders must compare term sheets on a true economic basis because option pools, SAFEs, and notes can materially change dilution and effective valuation. A pro forma cap table is essential for understanding ownership and dilution; intuition alone is not enough. Governance and boards are beneficial because they reduce future legal risk and establish corporate hygiene early. A simple early board structure is usually better than overengineering control provisions too soon, with independent directors more common later in the company lifecycle.

Data Points: Investor term sheet commitment level: 10 of 10 - Jason says originating a term sheet signals maximum intent to invest. Typical legal cost to originate a term sheet: hundreds to low thousands of dollars - Jason describes the investor-side cost of preparing a term sheet. Diligence cost per deal: $2,000 to $5,000 - Jason estimates his firm’s diligence spend per deal. Series A diligence cost: $10,000 to $20,000 - Becky says Series A diligence is often significantly more expensive than early-stage rounds. Deal-killer frequency at $1M-$3M term sheet range: about one every five years - Becky estimates true deal-breaking diligence issues are rare at this stage. Signed term sheets that fail to close: less than 1 in 100 - Jason estimates and Becky agrees that post-signature fallout is very uncommon. Ownership example: 70% to 40% to 35% - Jason uses this as an illustration of dilution founders may see after financing. Board size preference at early stage: 3-person board - Becky says early-stage companies usually work best with a small board. Typical board composition discussed: 2 common, 1 investor - Becky describes a common early-stage board structure. Independent director timing: between Series B and Series C - Becky says independents usually appear later than seed or Series A.

Pivotal Quotes: "When things get serious, a term sheet shows up." — Jason Calacanis: Explaining why the term sheet is the key commitment point in startup fundraising. "You really got to understand: is the investor asking for an option pool increase?" — Becky DeGras: Describing why headline valuation alone can be misleading. "If it looks like you're hiding it, people are going to think that you're a fraud." — Becky DeGras: Advising founders to disclose major lawsuits or other material issues early in diligence.

Implications: Founders should treat term sheets as serious commitments, model dilution carefully, disclose major risks early, and build simple governance structures from the start. Doing so reduces legal blowups and improves fundraising credibility.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About This Week in Startups

Jason Calacanis covers startups, tech, markets, media, and all the hottest topics in business and technology. He also interviews the world’s greatest founders, operators, investors, and innovators.

View all episodes from This Week in Startups