10% Happier with Dan Harris
10% Happier with Dan Harris

The Evidence for Aliens, the Afterlife, Bigfoot, Sea Monsters, and More | Miguel Sancho

An investigative journalist on why reincarnation, ghosts, and unexplained phenomena deserve more scrutiny; plus, why our need to believe in something bigger isn't something to be embarrassed about. Miguel Sancho is an Emmy Award–winning television producer and author. He is a veteran of ABC New

Featured Speakers

Miguel Sancho Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: Dan Harris interviews journalist Miguel Sancho about his shift from hardened skeptic to more open-minded investigator of paranormal claims. Sancho argues for epistemic humility: many UFO/UAP, Bigfoot, afterlife, and ancient-archaeology claims are likely false, but some remain genuinely unexplained and deserve serious inquiry without credulity or scams.

Main Topics: Sancho’s shift from skeptic to open-minded investigator (Priority: 5/5): He explains that his work has not made him a believer in everything paranormal, but has pushed him toward greater humility and willingness to entertain anomalous claims without abandoning rigor. UFOs/UAP and government transparency (Priority: 5/5): Sancho reviews famous UFO cases, notes that most sightings are misidentifications or hoaxes, but says a small fraction remain unexplained and could involve foreign tech, disinformation, or possibly nonhuman craft. Bigfoot and cryptozoology (Priority: 4/5): He treats Bigfoot as unlikely but not impossible, pointing to relict species and the possibility that a hominid branch could have existed or still exist, while acknowledging the weakness of modern photographic evidence. Loch Ness, deep-sea monsters, and crypto-terrestrial speculation (Priority: 4/5): Sancho is more open to undiscovered large ocean life than to creatures like Nessie, and discusses the more speculative idea that some UAP might be transmedium or ocean-based entities. Afterlife, reincarnation, and psychics (Priority: 4/5): He distinguishes between fraudulent psychics exploiting grief and studies that suggest possible anomalous phenomena in children’s apparent conversations with the dead or memories of past lives. Ancient archaeology and humility before mystery (Priority: 3/5): He argues that some ancient structures remain unexplained and that attributing them to aliens can be both premature and racist; the real lesson is awe and respect for human ingenuity. Belief, religion, and civilization (Priority: 3/5): Sancho says humans have a real need for something bigger than themselves; religion can be harmful, but also socially useful as a moral counterweight and source of compassion, even if one doesn’t accept miracles literally.

Key Arguments: The show and book do not argue for blind belief; they apply journalistic and scientific standards to anomalous claims. Many UFO/UAP videos are explainable as hoaxes or misidentifications, but a meaningful minority remain unresolved even after rigorous scrutiny. Unexplained does not equal alien: possible explanations include rival military tech, disinformation, or unknown natural phenomena. Bigfoot is unlikely given the lack of modern evidence, but the existence of relict species means an unknown hominid is not logically impossible. Ocean depths remain underexplored, making large undiscovered sea creatures more plausible than many land-based cryptids. Claims of psychic communication and reincarnation are vulnerable to fraud, yet some child cases and research programs are intriguing enough to merit study. Ancient monumental structures may reflect impressive human capability rather than extraterrestrial intervention; jumping to alien explanations can carry racist assumptions. Humans benefit from epistemic humility: remain skeptical, but don’t dismiss ideas solely because they sound absurd today. Religious belief is not required for morality, but religious traditions may still have historically supported altruism, restraint, and social cohesion. Sancho’s broader thesis is that extraordinary claims should be investigated carefully because some “ridiculous” ideas have become accepted science.

Data Points: UFO/UAP case assessment: 70% to 80% dismissed - Sancho estimates most investigated aerial anomaly videos are misidentifications or hoaxes. Book publication: May of 2026 - He says Evidence of the Extraordinary was published by Simon & Schuster in May 2026. Show duration: 6 years - The Proof Is Out There has been running long enough for Sancho to describe his role as ongoing over six years. Podcast/newsletter promo: Weekly - Dan Harris mentions a free Monday newsletter and weekly or sometimes twice-weekly live streams in the app promo. OneSkin evidence base: 4 peer-reviewed clinical studies - A sponsor segment notes OneSkin’s results are backed by peer-reviewed studies. OneSkin review volume: over 10,000 five-star reviews - Sponsor copy cites customer reviews for OneSkin. Masterclass classes: more than 200 classes across 13 categories - Sponsor segment describing Masterclass’s catalog. Masterclass discount: at least 15% off annual membership - Offer mentioned for listeners at masterclass.com/happier. Children’s reincarnation research: hundreds of cases / about 1600 cases - Sancho references Ian Stevenson’s documentation of many child reincarnation cases, giving an approximate figure of 1,600. Human population comparison: 8 billion now vs 2 billion before - He uses the population increase to question how reincarnation would account for spirit/identity math. Scientific skepticism threshold: one or twice - He says credentialed experts have occasionally said they honestly do not know what a UAP is.

Pivotal Quotes: "we should be more hospitable to these things. We should not eliminate the possibility of something truly anomalous being the case just because of our own empirical prejudices." — Miguel Sancho: Summing up his case for open-minded skepticism and against reflexive dismissal. "Many things can be true." — Miguel Sancho: His central framing on UFOs/UAP: unexplained phenomena may have multiple possible causes, not just aliens. "the desire and the need, if you will, to believe in something bigger is not something that we should show. On or be embarrassed about or try to evolve beyond, but something that is in fact crucial to the process of evolution and progress itself." — Miguel Sancho: He argues that the human hunger for transcendence is adaptive and socially useful.

Implications: Listeners are encouraged to hold skepticism and wonder together: investigate extraordinary claims rigorously, avoid scams, and remain open to anomalies that could expand science, history, or consciousness.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About 10% Happier with Dan Harris

View all episodes from 10% Happier with Dan Harris