Episode Summary
Executive Summary: Tobias Carlisle argues that U.S. equities are historically overvalued and that Netflix is an attractive short because its premium valuation depends on sustained high growth amid rising competition, content costs, and cash burn. He defends value investing using long-run data, critiques price-to-book and market-cap-weighted value ETFs, and explains why international value may offer better diversification and opportunity than U.S.-only exposure.
Main Topics: U.S. market overvaluation (Priority: 5/5): Carlisle says multiple valuation measures show the U.S. market is extremely expensive and likely to deliver weak long-term returns, though timing remains uncertain. Netflix short thesis (Priority: 5/5): He makes Netflix his top short idea, citing rich valuation, negative free cash flow, debt, increasing content costs, and intensifying competition from Disney and other platforms. Debate over Netflix valuation methods (Priority: 4/5): The hosts discuss bullish arguments that treat Netflix like cable or value subscribers by lifetime economics; Carlisle rejects cable analogies because streaming is easier to cancel and competition is far higher. Why value investing has lagged (Priority: 5/5): Carlisle argues value underperformance is largely explained by growth/tech outperformance, not the failure of value itself, and that the current stretch is historically unusual. Critique of price-to-book in value ETFs (Priority: 4/5): He explains that price-to-book is a weak screening metric today because buybacks and negative equity make book value misleading for many great businesses. International diversification and value investing (Priority: 4/5): The discussion turns to why non-U.S. value may be attractive, with Carlisle emphasizing home-country bias, lower valuations abroad, and the usefulness of global value exposure. Podcast/network announcements (Priority: 2/5): The episode closes with promotion of the Investors Podcast Network and the new Millennial Investing show hosted by Robert Leonard.
Key Arguments: The U.S. stock market is materially overvalued by several measures, including Tobin's Q, Shiller P/E, and market cap to GNP, implying weak expected long-run equity returns. Value investing has not stopped working; rather, growth/tech has outperformed so strongly that value looks weak by comparison, and the current underperformance stretch is historically rare. Netflix is expensive on nearly every multiple and depends on very high growth to justify its valuation, but that growth is likely to slow as competition rises. Netflix's business is more like a movie studio than cable because content creation is costly, hit-driven, and increasingly crowded by competitors with deep pockets. The cable-TV subscriber valuation analogy for Netflix is flawed because streaming has low switching costs and no local monopoly-like stickiness. Price-to-book is not a robust value metric in the modern economy because buybacks can drive equity to zero or negative, making book value misleading. Market-cap weighting tends to dilute value strategy returns because smaller companies are often more undervalued; equal weighting or smaller-cap tilts often work better. International value can be more attractive than U.S.-only value because many foreign markets are cheaper and provide diversification away from U.S. tech concentration.
Data Points: U.S. market overvaluation: ~80% overvalued - Carlisle cites Tobin's Q as indicating the U.S. market is about 80% above historical norms, second only to the dot-com bubble. Valuation horizon: 10-20 years - He says valuation is more useful for long-run expected returns than for short-term market timing. Netflix PE multiple: 100x+ - He describes Netflix as trading at more than 100 times earnings, making it extremely expensive. Netflix enterprise multiple: High 70s - He says Netflix trades at a very high enterprise multiple on his acquirers' measure. Netflix subscriber count: 140 million subscribers - Used in the cable-subscriber valuation analogy discussed by the hosts. Subscriber value analogy: $1,000 per recurring subscriber - Bill Nygren's bullish comparison used to justify Netflix's enterprise value. Netflix enterprise value: ~$140 billion - Derived in the discussion from 140 million subscribers at $1,000 each. Netflix penetration in U.S.: 64.5% - Hosts mention Netflix already has substantial U.S. penetration, limiting domestic growth. Netflix Japan penetration: 17% - Used as an example of remaining international growth potential. Netflix pricing: $9-$16/month - Subscription price range mentioned in the valuation discussion. ETF return since inception: 1% annualized - IVLU's performance since June 2015 was cited as evidence of weak recent value results. Value vs growth underperformance: 32% - The host cites Professor French data showing value underperformed growth by 32% over the past 10 years. Long-run value return: 18.8% per year - Carlisle references Fama-French data showing the cheap/value decile's long-run annual return. Long-run glamour/growth return: 9% per year - Carlisle compares this with the expensive/growth decile's long-run annual return. Value ETF expense ratio: 30 bps (0.3%) - Expense ratio for the iShares MSCI World Value Enhanced UCITS ETF discussed by the host. ETF holdings count: 334 stocks - The international value ETF's broad diversification was highlighted. Japan weight in ETF: 40% - Japan is the largest country allocation in the discussed international value ETF. UK weight in ETF: 15% - Second-largest country allocation in the ETF. Top 10 holdings concentration: 19% of assets - The top 10 holdings in the ETF account for 19% of fund assets. Negative equity example: Book value can fall to zero or below - Used to explain why buybacks make price-to-book misleading for companies like McDonald's.
Pivotal Quotes: "The market is very overvalued." — Tobias Carlisle: His opening assessment of current market conditions and expected long-run returns. "The only way for this to go is for the stock price to go down." — Tobias Carlisle: His conclusion on Netflix's long-term risk/reward given competition, content costs, and valuation. "Value has had multiple periods of underperformance, and this is what keeps the strategy evergreen because people lose faith in the strategy." — Tobias Carlisle: His explanation for why value investing cycles and eventually revives after long droughts.
Implications: Listeners should expect weaker long-run U.S. equity returns, be cautious with expensive growth stocks like Netflix, and consider global diversification. The episode reinforces that valuation discipline still matters, but metric choice and portfolio construction are critical.
About We Study Billionaires
We interview and study famous financial billionaires, including Warren Buffett, Ray Dalio, and Howard Marks, and teach you what we learn and how you can apply their investment strategies in the stock market. We Study Billionaires is the largest stock investing podcast show in the world with 180,000,000+ downloads and is hosted by Stig Brodersen, Preston Pysh, William Green, Clay Finck, and Kyle Grieve. This podcast also includes the Richer Wiser Happier series hosted by best-selling author Wi...