This Week in Startups
This Week in Startups

What investors mean when they are "waiting for a lead" (VC Sunday School) + Seth Bannon of 50 Years | E1395

First up is a VC Sunday school where Jason discusses what investors mean when they say "we are interested in investing, but come back when you found a lead" (1:51). Then, we tease Molly's EV review of the Audi e-tron Sportback (20:42). To wrap, Molly does a This Week in Climate Startu

Featured Speakers

Jason Calacanis HostSeth Bannon Guest

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: This episode covers venture fund mechanics, especially what it means when investors say they need a lead, then shifts to Molly’s EV review of the Audi e-tron and a broader debate about EV adoption, fuel efficiency, and car design. The final segment features Seth Bannon of 50 Years, who argues climate investing must embrace deep tech, technical diligence, and bold bets across food, construction, and synthetic biology—not just software.

Main Topics: What it means to 'find a lead' in venture rounds (Priority: 5/5): Jason explains that a lead investor sets round terms, does major diligence and legal review, often joins the board, and usually contributes the majority of capital, while followers rely on that work. Investor signaling, optionality, and stage fit (Priority: 4/5): The discussion distinguishes between lack of conviction and simple check-size mismatch, and explains how firms preserve optionality by waiting for a lead or using scouts/seed groups. Molly’s Audi e-tron EV review and EV market gaps (Priority: 4/5): Molly reviews the Audi e-tron Quattro as a Tesla alternative, highlighting good car fundamentals but missing Tesla-like conveniences such as a buttonless start and better heads-up display. Fuel economy, affordability, and American car preferences (Priority: 4/5): The hosts argue that efficient hybrids and EVs already exist at accessible prices, but U.S. consumers and automakers still favor larger vehicles, slowing adoption of efficient cars. Climate investing beyond software (Priority: 5/5): Seth Bannon argues climate VC should target hard problems with large impact—food systems, construction, materials, health—not just SaaS dashboards or lightweight climate software. Synthetic biology as a climate and industrial platform (Priority: 5/5): Bannon frames synthetic biology as faster, cheaper, and more accessible due to advances in read/write/edit/design tools, enabling breakthroughs in meat, chemicals, and medicine. Building technical diligence capability in VC (Priority: 5/5): Bannon says many climate-focused VCs lack the expertise to assess deep tech and need networks of PhDs or programs like 50 Years' PhD-to-VC pipeline to evaluate technical risk.

Key Arguments: A lead investor is the party that originates the term sheet, sets valuation and round structure, does the heavy diligence, reviews legal docs, and often takes a board seat. Smaller investors can participate without leading because diligence costs would be disproportionate to their check size and time available. When a firm says 'we're waiting for a lead,' it may signal either limited check size, stage mismatch, or lack of conviction—not necessarily rejection. VC has become too short-term and speculative; the industry should return to backing hard, technically risky, long-duration problems. Climate investing should include food, construction, materials, and synthetic biology because these sectors have large decarbonization potential. Synthetic biology is becoming more investable because sequencing, DNA writing, genome editing, and computational design have all become dramatically cheaper and faster. VCs investing in deep tech need specialized technical diligence and external expert networks because one PhD cannot evaluate all scientific domains. Founders benefit from investors who can offer multiple paths to yes, such as accelerator programs, small exploratory checks, and follow-on capital. Adoption of efficient cars and climate tech can lower prices over time, so early purchases help create the market that broader consumers later access. Large societal problems create the strongest venture opportunities because successful companies can generate both financial return and real-world impact.

Data Points: Typical seed fund check size: $50,000 to $250,000 - Jason describes common seed-fund investment sizes for first-time funds. Syndicate member check size: $5,000 to $50,000 - Used to contrast non-lead capital with lead-sized commitments. Angel check size range: $25,000 to $250,000 - Jason gives a broad range for angel investments. Example lead round: $2 million at a $10 million post-money valuation - Illustrative example of a lead setting round terms. Lead’s target commitment: $1.4 million of the $2 million round - Shows how a lead often provides the majority of capital. Diligence/legal cost example: $1,000 to $3,000 - Estimated review costs a lead may spend on diligence and documents. Hours of diligence: 10 to 30 hours - Jason describes typical lead-investor diligence effort. Largest round discussed for the firm: $6 million - Jason notes the firm’s historical upper bound for its own checks. Audi e-tron comparison: Similar to Model Y - Molly frames the Audi e-tron as a Tesla Model Y competitor. Average fuel economy in the EU: 40s mpg for fleets; 54 mpg for new cars - Used to contrast European and U.S. efficiency standards. Average fuel economy in the U.S.: 24 mpg, heading toward 26 mpg - Jason cites U.S. fleet and new-car efficiency. Honda Insight price and mileage: $25,000 and 55 mpg - Example of an affordable efficient five-seater. Hyundai Elantra HEV price and mileage: $23,000 and 53 mpg (56 highway) - Example used to argue efficient cars already exist at reasonable prices. Estimated annual fuel savings: About $1,000 per year - Jason estimates savings from more fuel-efficient vehicles. 30,000-dollar threshold: Under $30,000 - He proposes subsidy support only for lower-priced EVs/hybrids. 50 Years fund size: $90 million - Bannon describes the firm’s most recent fund. Portfolio size: 90+ teams - Bannon says the firm is supporting over 90 companies. First fund size: Under $5 million - Bannon recounts the firm’s initial fund size. Fund performance: Over 10x - Bannon says the first fund returned more than 10x. LP base: 44 founders of billion-dollar tech companies - Shows the firm’s founder-heavy investor base. Human genome sequencing cost: $3 billion initially; about $500 now - Used to show progress in synthetic biology. DNA writing cost reduction: From team-based lab work to code/order delivery - Describes how writing DNA has been abstracted by companies like Twist. Impact of Upside Foods: 99% less land use, 60% less energy, 98% less water - Bannon cites lifecycle analysis of cultivated meat. PhD-to-VC program length: 10 weeks - 50 Years trains PhDs to evaluate and work in venture. Technical diligence threshold: 15% chance or greater - Bannon’s rule of thumb for venture-grade technical risk.

Pivotal Quotes: "What do people mean when they keep saying, hey, we'll invest after you find a lead?" — Molly: The question that launched the VC Sunday School discussion about round mechanics. "A lead sets the terms for the round." — Jason: Jason’s concise definition of what a lead investor does in a financing. "We like to say our founders have made us look smart." — Seth Bannon: Bannon explains that 50 Years’ early climate and deep-tech thesis has been validated by returns.

Implications: Founders should understand investor roles and stage fit to avoid confusion, while climate startups should expect more technical scrutiny and a push toward hard-tech, high-impact solutions. The episode argues that bold, technically informed investing can unlock major returns and decarbonization.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About This Week in Startups

Jason Calacanis covers startups, tech, markets, media, and all the hottest topics in business and technology. He also interviews the world’s greatest founders, operators, investors, and innovators.

View all episodes from This Week in Startups