Excess Returns
Excess Returns

The Dangers of Hindsight Bias

Whenever any of us analyze the decisions we make in investing, there is always a tendency to think that what we end up knowing in retrospect was obvious at the time. There is a tendency to believe that decisions that we could have made were easier than they actually were. But that’s just not the way

Featured Speakers

Excess Returns Host

Topics Discussed

Episode Summary

Executive Summary: The episode argues that investors routinely overestimate their foresight after the fact, especially during crises like COVID-19. Jack and Justin stress that the current environment is extraordinarily uncertain because it combines a medical shock, uncertain market valuations, and an unprecedented economic shutdown. The main takeaway: avoid hindsight bias, stay humble about what is knowable in real time, and stick to a disciplined long-term asset allocation rather than trying to outguess events.

Main Topics: Hindsight Bias in Investing (Priority: 5/5): The hosts explain how investors often rewrite history to believe they predicted major market events, even when the outcome was highly uncertain at the time. COVID-19 as an Unusually Uncertain Shock (Priority: 5/5): They discuss how the virus created a rare situation where market outcomes depend on an evolving medical issue outside most investors' expertise. Retrospective Narratives vs. Real-Time Reality (Priority: 4/5): The conversation emphasizes that once outcomes are known, it becomes easy to cherry-pick facts that make the result seem obvious. Valuations and Cross-Sectional Opportunities (Priority: 4/5): They note that some market segments look cheap while the overall market remains more expensive than in prior crisis bottoms, complicating comparisons to 2008-09. Economic Shutdown and Unprecedented Policy Environment (Priority: 5/5): The hosts highlight that a forced shutdown of the economy introduces uncertainty about duration, recovery, and second-order effects that markets must absorb. Practical Investor Behavior (Priority: 5/5): The episode closes with a call for discipline: maintain an appropriate asset allocation and avoid overconfidence-driven action in the next bear market.

Key Arguments: Investors often believe they 'saw it coming' only after the fact, because hindsight makes the sequence of events appear more obvious than it was in real time. COVID-19 is especially hard to price because it is fundamentally a medical problem, not just a financial one, and most investors are not medical experts. Even if some indicators suggest the virus may be slowing, the range of possible outcomes remains wide, so real-time certainty is low. Market performance after a crisis is hard to infer from current facts because psychology and policy responses can quickly change the trajectory. Valuations should be viewed carefully: some sectors may be cheap, but the market as a whole was not at the same extreme valuation level as the 2009 bottom. Trying to prove you 'knew' the last crisis can make you overconfident and more likely to make poor decisions in the next one. The best actionable response is to have a sensible asset allocation and stick with it through uncertainty rather than reacting to short-term narratives.

Data Points: Timeframe comparison: 2008-2009 - Referenced as the prior bear market bottom used for comparison with current market conditions and valuations. Market comparison period: End of 2015 - Mentioned as another example of a market decline where investors later claim they saw the move coming. Potential market horizon: A year from now - Used to describe the possibility that investors may later look back on the crisis and see strong stock gains or a bottom in retrospect. Potential reopening horizon: All summer - Mentioned as one possible scenario in which the economy could reopen and remain open before a possible fall resurgence. Potential resurgence period: In the fall - Used to describe a scenario where virus cases could rise again and force renewed shutdowns. Investment horizon: Five years - Referenced when joking about Jack re-listening to the podcast and rereading his article in the future.

Pivotal Quotes: "whatever happens, we'll look back and we'll say, I saw it coming." — Jack/Justin: Explaining the core hindsight-bias problem in markets and how outcomes shape retrospective certainty. "there's so much uncertainty around so many things right now that even if we look back and say, I should have known it, you really shouldn't have known it" — Jack: Summarizing why the COVID period is too uncertain for confident ex-post claims of foresight. "if there's any lesson of all this, it's to do nothing" — Jack: The actionable takeaway: avoid overreacting and stick to an appropriate long-term asset allocation.

Implications: Listeners should resist hindsight bias, accept that crisis conditions are often unknowable in real time, and avoid translating past confidence into future overconfidence. The practical lesson is patience, discipline, and adherence to a long-term allocation.

🔓 Sign Up for Unlimited Episode Search

About Excess Returns

Excess Returns is dedicated to making you a better long-term investor and making complex investing topics understandable. Join Jack Forehand, Justin Carbonneau and Matt Zeigler as they sit down with some of the most interesting names in finance to discuss topics like macroeconomics, value investing, factor investing, and more.

View all episodes from Excess Returns